Why lugia as being banned outright.
Seriously let me have my brick wall for a bit.
Seriously let me have my brick wall for a bit.
Finally, I am aware that some people may attempt to refute everything I have written in this post by pointing out that even in the event that a metagame could be balanced while still containing most of the cover legendary Pokémon, then that balance would merely be a result of "broken Pokémon checking broken Pokémon," something that is undesirable. But to such people, I must say that this argument is invalid. Why are all OU and BL Pokémon banned from UU? Is it not because we can sustain the UU metagame? Since that is the case, why not move all OU and BL Pokémon to Übers then, and make UU the new OU metagame, since the balance that is achieved in the OU metagame is also a result of "broken Pokémon checking broken" from the perspective of the UU metagame? And why are all UU Pokémon banned from even lower tiers? Isn't it because UU Pokémon would be broken in such tiers? Why not move all UU Pokémon to Übers as well, since the UU metagame's balance is achieved through "broken Pokémon checking broken Pokémon" from the perspective of the lowest tiers? Depending on where one draws the line between "broken" and "not broken," absolutely any and every metagame could be seen as one in which balance is achieved only because "broken Pokémon check broken Pokémon," so it is not an argument to refute the idea that there should not be an initial banlist.
It seems the community really wants a Forretress and Skarmory evolution...a few pages back a person suggested an Arbok evolution into a Poison/Dragon, I thought that was a very neat idea...although VERY unlikely.
Any other thoughts on evolutions? Or which evolution you all want to see?
A Sableye evolution. Maybe a couple new eeveelutions. I'd like to point out though, that not everything needs to evolve, sometimes not evolving helps keep things unique and different. I'd personally rather not see Skarm/Forre evolve, and tbh if they were going to evolve it would have happened a long time ago (like when Gligar got it's gliscor evolution). I'd also like to point out that it is probably more likely that newer pokemon have a greater chance of getting an evolution. Things like Cryogonal (ice/steel?), Durant (good lord, we really don't need another bug/steel, but hey it could get one), or Stunfisk could really end up shining with the proper upgrade.
I agree. I think one of the biggest issues with this generation was how so much was gradually released. If everything had been available from the start, I can almost guarantee you it would be significantly different right now.I think right now, all I'll ask of Gen VI is a clear way to distinguish itself from Gen V, IV, and all others before it. Hopefully in a less chaotic way than Gen V.
I would like to remind the people posting in this thread that the idea that I proposed was to start the Generation VI metagame with all Übers and cover legendary Pokémon unbanned, not just a select few of them, and ban any overcentralizing Pokémon in such a metagame only through suspect testing. Discussions about the advantages and disadvantages of the specific movement of Ho-Oh, Reshiram, Lugia, Giratina, or possibly other Übers by themselves into the current OU metagame are not relevant to the message I have posted.
If you move a single, or just a select few Übers into the current OU metagame, then OF COURSE they are going to be broken. What do you expect by tacking onto the OU metagame a bunch of Pokémon that are clearly better than the rest? What I wish to see, which everyone who has replied to my post appear to have missed, is the movement of all Übers into OU at the start of Generation VI, and achieve a balance in the new OU metagame specifically as a result of all of these former Übers simultaneously existing in the OU metagame, creating a situation such that none of those former Übers are particularly powerful compared to every other Pokémon in the metagame, and if any is found to be so (such as Arceus), then it should be suspect tested.
I really like this idea cause I find Ubers to be a much more diverse and balanced metagame than OU. You can honestly use just about any team type and strategie you could possibly want. From HO to Stall, with just about everything inbetween like Soft Stall and Screens Offense. Heck, even Baton Pass just gained Minimize Drifblim to make it more viable. Hail is the only team type I have yet to seen pulled off successfully (there is probably one somewhere). Yeah, Kyogre and Arceus are major threats and the former has been having the highest usage in the tier since its birth (there may some exceptions I'm missing) but they all have answers to them that are very viable themselves and easy to fit onto teams. They may be centralizing but they aren't causing such massive head-aches on team building that you wish they didn't exist. (think Scizor in OU) There may not be as large a diversity of Pokemon as there is in OU (I'm so sure about this though) but almost every Pokemon has 3-4 viable sets as well as some OO sets that just need the right team to work beautifully and show that they are more than just gimmicks (I got my butt kicked by a TWave Mewtwo once).What I wish to see, which everyone who has replied to my post appear to have missed, is the movement of all Übers into OU at the start of Generation VI, and achieve a balance in the new OU metagame specifically as a result of all of these former Übers simultaneously existing in the OU metagame, creating a situation such that none of those former Übers are particularly powerful compared to every other Pokémon in the metagame, and if any is found to be so (such as Arceus), then it should be suspect tested.
ATM I'm seeing talk of unbanning Ho-oh, Reshiram, Lugia, and Giratina-O...what??? They are completely & thoroughly broken as has been the case for a long time, I sincerely doubt that gen VI's changes will be so drastic that they'll make these mons look even somewhat manageable. I get the "unban ho-oh its 4x sr weak" argument which has been around forever, even though it's pretty dumb and anyone who thinks Ho-oh wouldn't be broken most likely needs their head examined. I also get the "free Lugia" argument even though I disagree with it. I can even understand wanting to unban Reshiram even though I think it's absolutely retarded. However, what on earth compels anyone to want an unbanning of Giratina-O, of all things? I'm not a mod in this forum so I can't exactly lay down any restrictions, but I think that if you want to propose unbanning a mon that the majority of users consider overpowered, you should have an argument for it other than "i want to abuse broken shit in OU (which usually, not in this case, has a hidden message at the end that goes "because i can't actually win the majority of my games without a massive advantage"), which Scarfwynaut pretty much said. Also lol at Rayquaza_ saying that he's "not going to take their current tier placement seriously"....who do you think you are?
I swear, some of you people are so anti-ban that you'd be ok with Mewtwo or Rayquaza in OU!
btw our goal is to make the most competitive metagame, obviously the less bans the better but not wanting a large banlist is not an excuse for not banning broken things, which I've seen more times than I can count over the course of this generation.
This being said, I hate BW(2) with a fiery passion (seriously it could potentially be a great metagame if we got out of this stupid "instead of banning a few things for a better metagame lets ban nothing & get a shitty metagame" mentality), so I'm very excited for the new gen.
I really like this idea cause I find Ubers to be a much more diverse and balanced metagame than OU. You can honestly use just about any team type and strategie you could possibly want. From HO to Stall, with just about everything inbetween like Soft Stall and Screens Offense. Heck, even Baton Pass just gained Minimize Drifblim to make it more viable. Hail is the only team type I have yet to seen pulled off successfully (there is probably one somewhere). Yeah, Kyogre and Arceus are major threats and the former has been having the highest usage in the tier since its birth (there may some exceptions I'm missing) but they all have answers to them that are very viable themselves and easy to fit onto teams. They may be centralizing but they aren't causing such massive head-aches on team building that you wish they didn't exist. (think Scizor in OU) There may not be as large a diversity of Pokemon as there is in OU (I'm so sure about this though) but almost every Pokemon has 3-4 viable sets as well as some OO sets that just need the right team to work beautifully and show that they are more than just gimmicks (I got my butt kicked by a TWave Mewtwo once).
And regarding intitial banlists, yeah of course we need one, but I'm hoping people have realised that after BW's initial suspect tests. Anyone that wants Arceus (lol), Kyogre, Groudon and Mewtwo running around in what's supposed to be a balanced and desirable metagame is kidding themselves.