RVSGathering info in a game where we aren't sure we have an inspector or BG is gonna be interesting o.o
Vote UllarWarlord
Not much content here, an attempt to shift attention away from Obbmud. There were several reasons to lynch Obbmud, although they were all vague, so while this could be trying to save a scumbuddy it was probably an honest attempt to rediversify the discussion.I was typing a post as SS posted >:( I think honestly think we should switch our focus from Obbmud99 for the moment. With the info Cancerous posted, I don't know if his newbie facade is necessarily worthy of a scum hunt. He should be kept under watch, but imo we dont need 4 votes on him.
Celever you, along with More Cowbell, were one of the first to cast any sort of suspicion on Obbmud99, a suspicion which has really narrowed in focus untill Obbmud99 has become the biggest talk of conversation. While I won't make any accusations, the focus on Obbmud99 on rather vague reasons ("I heard he was good") is a little scummy. I won't make a vote yet, but I'll remove my random one on ullar for the moment.
unvote
This post is interesting. Most of the post is repeating other people's content. The vote on Memoric is probably simply caused by a lack of lurking, and therefore not noticing that Memoric was cleaned.I recognize the importance of the random vote phase for showing scum slips and gaining preliminary info, it can just seem a little forced and futile at points @.@ regardless, I'll try to do my part better to figure out who's what.
I don't like Felony's logic much either and after reading through the thread again I take back my vague allegations, Celever doesn't seem that scummy or quick to narrow in on another target. Sorry about that, LW said mistakes are okay though ^_^
I agree with LightWolf giving strong town vibes, but (not to get too WIFOM) LW is a strong enough player to put up a good facade. I think you could apply a similar description to yourself, Walrein.
I'd also like some more out of starwarsfan, as I haven't really been satisfied many of his posts and reasons. However, since Walrein already put some pressure there, I'd like to put pressure on fellow not-posting user Memoric
Vote Memoric
Please say something ^_^
Nothing much here.Whoops forget we figured that whole mayor thing out, 0-2 with legit posts so far @.@
Unvote
I'll wait to see swf's defense before I cast again ^_^
This post seems towny. He does a good job of responding to Felony, and then makes good accusations against Felony, some of them are repeating what others had said but not all.Because in the very post you quoted, Celever says we banded wagoned too quickly. I accused him of focusing on obbman as he first questioned his story, but missed the part where he criticized the focusing. I did read what you wrote, his post didn't seem defensive at all, it just seemed like he thought we made fast decisions. You seem more defensive than Celever tbh.
Honestly your behavior is pretty weird itt. I can't tell if you're just misguided town or if you're scum or what. You seem to think that anyone posting something similar to someone else is scummy, and while scumminess and merely bandwagoning sometimes go together, they don't have to. Just because someone is confirmed town doesn't mean we need to hang on their every word for scum tells, for all we know the cleaned villagers could be completely off. They might not even have opinions yet @.@ On the one hand your dedication makes me think town, but your pushiness and defensiveness are pretty clear.
Similar to his second post, trying to get us onto a better line of discussion while putting a pressure vote on someone who hasn't been very active and who made quite a few--innocent or otherwise--mistakes.I haven't seen Tesung or DLE post anything significant, while I can definitely sympathize with exam pain it'd be nice to see something out of that role. Neither has done anything super scummy, but the misunderstanding of the role of scum hunting doesn't sit super well with me. Wouldn't DLE know that scum hunting is necessary for the village when explaining NOC stuff? Vote Tesung
This whole "defensive/offensive" argument is largely subjective and easily misinterpreted. Even a careful examination of text can mean different things to different players, we largely fill in emotion in blank texts ourselves. While there are definite offensive/defensive rhetoric and we can use them to scum hunt, I think we might be over focusing on "omg that was so defensive." Taking a step back and evaluating the situation as a whole never hurts.
Nothing much here, just clarifying a misunderstanding.Walrein I clarified that I value defensiveness evaluation as a tool, but it seems to be 100% monopolizing the conversation. I don't know where you're pulling "stifling conversation" from, I just wanted to talk a little about logical inconsistencies because other people (like yourself) are covering most of the points for the defensiveness scum hunt. Just trying to help ^_^
He does a good job of arguing against Tesung, getting a town read from this post.To be fair Felony attacked Celever and idk if Celever lead the lynch against Felony at all. Walrein had a pretty detailed breakdown of the start of the argument, but I don't think he should be blamed for that it was just aggressive scumhunting.
I'm going to replace my vote on you Tesung because almost all your votes haven't sat well with me. I'm still confused as to why an experienced player like DLE would tell you scum hunting is bad, and your vote on celever isn't 100% justified imo. I know I haven't posted anything huge (a lot of it is exams, some of it is I'm not super adept at the huge analysis thing) but I think I've done a little positive contributing to discussion and I've really tried to bring original and insightful thoughts, where as neither you nor DLE has posted more than a few sentences. My vote is going to stay on you for now.
Looking back over Felony's posts with the perspective of cleanness isn't doing too much for me personally, he really came off as misguided town to me. If someone can glean more from that please post it but he just seems like a town who was really aggressive and who's logic wasn't always 100%.
Nothing much here TBH.I still might be in favor of a Tesung lynch because he's not really doing to much as a villager and seems scummy, but to be fair he did state this to begin with (I misstated this once or twice myself, sorry).
The first part is interesting. He's gone a long way from accusing Celever to being the most player who defends him the most. Just something to note, otherwise this post seems towny to meOkay so it'd be nice to hear everyone's thoughts on lynching Tesung vs Celever as they're the only ones talked about. In regards to Tesung's explanation post, it seems somewhat believable to me, but he just really hasn't done anything worth anything for the town. Lightwolf is currently hounding (heh) Celever with some interesting results. Celever's whole "you jumped on that lynch and it made a difference" was completely unfounded in my opinion, but I'll be lenient with fact checking cause I've fucked up some facts too @.@ LW has accused Celever of overreacting a few times, but personally I don't see it. His answers are pretty comprehensive and long, but they don't strike me as over emotional or worried, just detailed. There are some inconsistencies, but nothing overly scummy in nature. Also when it comes down to it, Celever has actually posted content that allows us to pick it apart for scum tells, which has lead us on several productive discussions, including this one now. Tesung hasn't really prompted anything except "what?" and "wow that's scummy" and hasn't contributed to discussion.
I typed the above paragraph and then Walrein posted so I'll respond. I feel like in a lot of ways, Tesung and Ullar are similar. Both have contributed very little to discussion, both have said some weird things, both hide behind excuses like "I'm lazy" and "I'm bad." I think they're very similar suspects for today's lynch, and because Tesung actually posted something and it's somewhat believable, I'm willing to change my vote to vote Ullar unless he posts something decent as well. Thanks for bringing that back to light walrein, I'd forgotten about our self depreciating suspect.
Responds in the way any sensible person, village or mafia, would to my random accusation. Nothing much to see here.Sorry forgot! unvote vote ullarwarlord
This post seems good. Not really much to say here, he just made a few reads that make a lot of sense to me.To be fair starwarsfan the reason 3 people ganged up on you seems to me the same reason that Felony was lynched yesterday. A few random, slightly baseless accusations thrown around riled players up. However, I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, as we can tell a lot from the way players respond when they feel threatened or accused.
I honestly think obbmud99 handled this response to a random accusation pretty well. While the reverse accusation was a little unfounded, it seems to be based on confusion in swf's wording. Otherwise, doesn't seem to defensive or anything.
It's annoying that PokeguyNXB posted some lol-lines and left, but he said he was unable to post significantly right now so I'll give him a break until tomorrow. But after that, the watchful town eye should be focused on Pokeguy because we've heard nothing from his role.
It's nice that we've got some more active townies atm, thought lots of new players and yeah spiresquire I've played like only a few NOCs so I'm not the most experienced or anything.
I think I edited the old post correctly, this might or might not be accurate. Spire didn't bold his vote so not sure the votes on swf.
ninja'd but on previous pages memoric/your vote was 2, so that'd be 3 on swf
No content here.Nevermind I'm a dumb and messed up votes
Oh, and Ace. If you wouldn't mind posting a few links of games you've been in, I'd greatly appreciate it. I hope it isn't too bothersome for you to remember. Unless you're scared that I'll analyze you. :)
This is essentially a beginner game now. DLL, Empoof and Paperblade were all experienced but they all subbed out, and B_T unfortunately died, leaving us with two experienced players and everyone else is ranging from brand new (the bulk of the game) to fairly experienced, but less than 3 games.
Wow, pressure. Since I finally have access to an actual computer, I'll post. TBH, I've only been posting at all so I'm not accused of being inactive. And I also don't want to be accused of bandwagoning or just repeating what others have said, and all there is to be said about most accused scum here has already been said. Well... I guess I have no choice but to bandwagon since I'm kind of lost here, even after reading through the whole game multiple times. But then again, maybe not. I think I'll just go and vote No Lynch because I'm honestly lost.
Okay first I will reply to Celever then post whatever comment I have on the last few pages.
First because it seems I have to say my last few points again:
A. The "Felony bandwagon was overfocused so smaller things were overlooked" line of thought was not a point against you but an opening statement
B. I feel you overreacted when I asked questions about your vote of DLE. You spent a decent sized paragraph to explain why it was not suspicious when all I expected to hear was "I might as well prod someone inactive while coming up with a suspect". If you yourself thought it was a reasonable curse of action, why would you give it so much thought that you felt you needed to express in your defense? That's my point about that case
C. In your reply for my first accusation targeting you, you replied with saying I was also one of the first to vote Felony as well, which heavily sounded like you are trying to discredit me, especially since your argument was over exaggerating what actually happened (I was the 4th of the 5 actual votes on Felony, sure technically one of the first, but being on of the first of the the first of 5 might as well mean everyone), naturally this could be just a case of misremembering or just a turn of whatever, but the whole argument boiled down to ", but you X Y Z"
As for your newest don't trust LW post. Yeah I made that point pretty early Day 1 when people started the whole I sound town thing, I made it pretty clear I play both sides the same(One game I got my partner aska lynched out of the blue when I found his behavior suspicious in one of my tl;dr posts, fun times). Alas I still have a problem with your post, namely you are targeting me specifically, yeah tons of people say they think I'm town, and I 100% approve of doubting everyone(paranoia is kinda my thing) but just as many have suggested Walrein as likely clean or cleanest, yet you just focus on me who has been trying to build a case on you. You could be warning people against MC and Walrein, I think we can agree on that no one should be trusted that easily from the underlined group (I'd put Ullar as an italic though, no offense Ullar, don't kill me in WotR).
And since Celever has replied since I started writing this up:
I believe you misunderstood me, I'm not saying your post oozed from emotion, I merely felt like it was the kind of post I'd see someone being under pressure would make, as in only someone who thinks they did something wrong needs to make excuses kind of thing. And I don't really remember TP that was ages ago, I think, can't remember, and I don't really care since anything pointing at previous games is a WIFOM on the long run, I like to look at games isolated. As for the More Cowbelle thing, for one you had him underlined and on the other hand I didn't want to seem like I'm picking on Walrein only rather than making a point in favour of crippling paranoia.