Some see it as the definitive modern art form; others, nothing more than a visual plague on our cities that encourages other forms of vandalism and lawbreaking. What about you?
Personally, I can see the arguments from both sides. Not much is more satisfying to me than seeing people do something creative and productive, out of their own free will, without payment, that contributes to the community in such a way that graffiti does.
However, it does have its place. Broken Window Theory applies to graffiti especially in mid-way areas that maybe have a few windows broken or whatever.
One solution is designated graffiti areas, although to many this goes against the true meaning of graffiti, which is freedom of expression with no restrictions. One of my favourite artists, Banksy, exploited this concept to bring art to places that would not normally receive it, and has been praised for it:
I'd like to make a point that I am not fond of all graffiti. I hate things like this:
But then I'll see something like this and scold myself for ever doubting the creativity and talent of many graffiti artists:
Personally, I can see the arguments from both sides. Not much is more satisfying to me than seeing people do something creative and productive, out of their own free will, without payment, that contributes to the community in such a way that graffiti does.
However, it does have its place. Broken Window Theory applies to graffiti especially in mid-way areas that maybe have a few windows broken or whatever.
One solution is designated graffiti areas, although to many this goes against the true meaning of graffiti, which is freedom of expression with no restrictions. One of my favourite artists, Banksy, exploited this concept to bring art to places that would not normally receive it, and has been praised for it:

I'd like to make a point that I am not fond of all graffiti. I hate things like this:

But then I'll see something like this and scold myself for ever doubting the creativity and talent of many graffiti artists:
