NOC Fallout New Vegas NOC [GAME OVER - Wastelanders Win]

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is something with you that is not right. Your actions and reasoning speak more to self preservation than they do about advancing the village.
That's the whole point of everything here. Once you wake up and see half the town is lynching you, even after you bring decent reasoning for defense that convinces some of the more experienced players (like Jalmont, fate), you start to get paranoid. Spiffy can confirm this for you, evident in his obvious paranoia when people started to jump on him from page 18 to 20.
I will address the more important part of your text in my next post,

edit: "Hi everybody! I'm the village announcer! While I'm sad to see the Safeguard go, judging by how the day went, it could so easily have been me instead, so here's hoping we don't repeat the same mistakes tomorrow!"
 
Last edited:
THE VILLAGE DIDN'T LYNCH HIM EVEN THOUGH HE WAS THE BEST CANDIDATE BASED ON THE SOLE REASON THAT HE JUST SAID HE WAS IMPORTANT AND GAVE AN ARBITRARY DEADLINE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT COULDN'T BE MET WITH REASONABLE DISCUSSION.
Best candidate?! You must have ignored the part where Spiffy confesses he was misunderstanding the whole situation? refer to post 459 please. There wasn't much reason to lynch me anymore after the advocator of it, Spiffy, confessed he was mistaken about it. I admit, I was still paranoid because people like sunny, pokeguyNXB and even Celever could just have jumped on my band wagon.

About the whole claim situation, I'm still not convinced how it would help the town in any form. I've defended myself and managed to ward off people like Celever and even Spiffy when they thought they'd find something scummy in my behaviour. I'm not asking for any kind of impunity with regards to my possible power role. What I want is for people to start to actually scumhunt based on previous day, and their results from last night. If you all give up the "let's lynch haunted because why not" (see how mafia benefits from my presence?) attitude and start to scumhunt for real, this village will actually have a chance to find some clues as to who is really scum. I will also start to share my ideas then because right now, I'm puzzled with the contradictive behaviour of people like Spiffy.

"Hi everybody! I'm the village announcer! While I'm sad to see the Safeguard go, judging by how the day went, it could so easily have been me instead, so here's hoping we don't repeat the same mistakes tomorrow!"
 
ButteredToast You still fail to bring a good reason why I sound even a bit scummy to you, because everything about paranoia and self preservation that you find in me, you can also find in Spiffy when he was attacked in page 18-20.

Also, don't panick about "if haunted managed to get the heat off himself with a claim, then everyone can do that!" I could pull it off just because:
a) I knew how shallow and uncertain Spiffy's reasonings to lynch me were (evident in page 17, in just 4 minutes from my post he quickly changes his vote, while if he had a good reason to lynch me he would have insisted on it a little more)
b) None of the people who were bandwagoning on me had actually asked me any questions or put any pressure on me! Only you said a few things in your list but even you were like: "i suspect jalmont and lw more but idk let's lynch haunted why not"
Spiffy had an army of bandwagoners behind him on lynching me, and all I did was a counter attack to push them towards himself.

edit: "Hi everybody! I'm the village announcer! While I'm sad to see the Safeguard go, judging by how the day went, it could so easily have been me instead, so here's hoping we don't repeat the same mistakes tomorrow!"
 
Also, now that I have time I will soon update with my own list of scumreads. But now I'm waiting for more posts from people like sunny004 , PokeguyNXB and a sub for Ullar
But this is my top 3 suspects for now: Pokeguynxb, Spiffy (i'm still puzzled about him), celever

edit (sry more cowbell): "Hi everybody! I'm the village announcer! While I'm sad to see the Safeguard go, judging by how the day went, it could so easily have been me instead, so here's hoping we don't repeat the same mistakes tomorrow!"
 
Another question. Goody. First of all, three full pages happened when I was asleep. So I might as well Unvote (also Celever has made a good point about why we shouldn't lynch HD)

Celever Jalmont vonFiedler PokeguyNXB sunny004 Fatecrashers Amianki Serious Bananas rssp1
Should Haunted Diamond claim his role? Not allowing this to not be addressed.
I did believe this, but once again, Celever explains why this was bad

ButteredToast sunny004 I highly recommend this lynch be abandoned. The reasoning is just too weak. Who knows? Maybe he is scum. but this lynch isn't strong enough atm.

Also, now that I have time I will soon update with my own list of scumreads. But now I'm waiting for more posts from people like sunny004 , PokeguyNXB and a sub for Ullar
But this is my top 3 suspects for now: Pokeguynxb, Spiffy (i'm still puzzled about him), celever
Ah, you find me scummy due to not contributing, following others repeatedly, and *ahem* "staying under the radar", correct? *sigh*... why must people force me to do nothing by making all the good points first... and then calling me out for doing nothing but following...
 
Haunted Diamond said:
He even said something like "it doesn't matter if you are town or not, we're gonna lynch you." (i can find the quote if you want)
LOL yes please find the quote for this one I'd love to see it.

Haunted Diamond said:
You must have ignored the part where Spiffy confesses he was misunderstanding the whole situation? refer to post 459 please. There wasn't much reason to lynch me anymore after the advocator of it, Spiffy, confessed he was mistaken about it. I admit, I was still paranoid because people like sunny, pokeguyNXB and even Celever could just have jumped on my band wagon.
Just because you make an IRL excuse that I deem to be a valid possibility at the time DOESN'T mean you are completely absolved of the scummy way you behaved the whole day. I cooled down on you because your excuses seemed plausible, and I didn't think you were the best lynch at the time. You use this against me saying that I have no reason to think you're scummy just because I thought your story might be true. How DARE I even CONSIDER you as a possibility after I have retracted my vote against you!

Go look back to every NOC on this forum: anyone that softclaimed power role was always forced to claim their role. Don't turn it back on me by claiming I'm scummy for trying to make you follow through with something you clearly were willing to do when your neck is on the line.

You've still given no excuse for the really devious way you used your claim ("hey guys I'm a power role don't lynch me and I won't be on til after deadline so I am going to contribute nothing more to the discussion even though we're really down to the wire here kthxbye").

Haunted Diamond said:
Spiffy had an army of bandwagoners behind him on lynching me, and all I did was a counter attack to push them towards himself.
Lol stop giving yourself so much credit you never even cast a vote against me on Day 1 you silly goose.

Honestly I'm pretty disappointed we didn't lynch PokeguyNXB Day 1 because he's probably going to be lynched eventually and it would have been better to get it out of the way earlier on instead of at LYLO or something because he just refuses to take stances on anyone. Oh well hindsight is 20/20.

PokeguyNXB please explain why you only vote for the most popular lynch at the time and offer nothing of substance to the discussion yourself.

I want to hear more from Fatecrashers rssp1 Amianki Serious Bananas and they can start with whether they think Haunted Diamond should claim.
 
LOL yes please find the quote for this one I'd love to see it.
Yeah Haunted Diamond I gave my reasons. Just because you explain them away now doesn't mean your slate is clean.
And after that you went on about how I'm the best lynch for that day.

Just because you make an IRL excuse that I deem to be a valid possibility at the time DOESN'T mean you are completely absolved of the scummy way you behaved the whole day. I cooled down on you because your excuses seemed plausible, and I didn't think you were the best lynch at the time. You use this against me saying that I have no reason to think you're scummy just because I thought your story might be true. How DARE I even CONSIDER you as a possibility after I have retracted my vote against you![/USER] and they can start with whether they think Haunted Diamond should claim.

"Hi everybody! I'm the village announcer! While I'm sad to see the Safeguard go, judging by how the day went, it could so easily have been me instead, so here's hoping we don't repeat the same mistakes tomorrow!"
 
Ok that quoting got messed up. It should have looked like this:
Just because you make an IRL excuse that I deem to be a valid possibility at the time DOESN'T mean you are completely absolved of the scummy way you behaved the whole day. I cooled down on you because your excuses seemed plausible, and I didn't think you were the best lynch at the time. You use this against me saying that I have no reason to think you're scummy just because I thought your story might be true. How DARE I even CONSIDER you as a possibility after I have retracted my vote against you!
if you guys doubt my timezone, or me being busy during the weekdays just check my profile and the vms.
Did you ever bother to do this?? Almost on every tournament scheduling I've mentioned my timezone and proposed weekends as my available days. Honestly I don't know why you need me to prove this to you.

"Hi everybody! I'm the village announcer! While I'm sad to see the Safeguard go, judging by how the day went, it could so easily have been me instead, so here's hoping we don't repeat the same mistakes tomorrow!"
 
Can you explain how claiming would help me in any way? a) You have nothing to prove that my behavior is scummy,
b)If that claim was supposed to provide me any "impunity", I wouldn't have had 4 lynches on me yesterday!
The only thing the claiming does right now is to clear the vagueness surrounding the power roles and would make choosing a target easier for mafia. Please Spiffy, show me where I'm wrong.

"Hi everybody! I'm the village announcer! While I'm sad to see the Safeguard go, judging by how the day went, it could so easily have been me instead, so here's hoping we don't repeat the same mistakes tomorrow!"
 
PokeguyNXB please explain why you only vote for the most popular lynch at the time and offer nothing of substance to the discussion yourself.
I simply agreed with the reasoning point for point (except the so called scumslip Celever harped on earlier, that's somewhat questionable), and I didn't add anything because I believed there was no more to be said. What, are you expecting me to do, make up a fake reasoning so it LOOKS like I have something to say? Yeah no, that's even scummier than saying nothing at all.
 

Pretty much sums up how I feel right now with the argument I am trying to make. But I will try this again and a few more times if I have to.

About the whole claim situation, I'm still not convinced how it would help the town in any form. I've defended myself and managed to ward off people like Celever and even Spiffy when they thought they'd find something scummy in my behaviour. I'm not asking for any kind of impunity with regards to my possible power role. What I want is for people to start to actually scumhunt based on previous day, and their results from last night.

This is a paradox. You want us to scum hunt based on the results from last night and this is what we're doing. The announcer states he was almost lynched. Someone used an action that linked you to the announcer as well. This isn't just about your actions at the end of day one. It is also about going with the only source of information that has been made public to the group. That is the announcers clues and you being tagged to the announcer. This is why I said at the very least, you need to tell us if you are or are not the announcer. It would help narrow down the targets of possible people who they could be and allow us to focus elsewhere.

That make sense? I have a list of people who the announcer could be. And depending on if or if you are not the announcer, it helps us to look at other people and better avoid a miss lynch on day two. You need to let me and the group know if you're him or not. This will both go a ways to lessen suspicion from you and focus on other people who were almost lynched last day as being somewhat "safer." And there are additional reasons I want a yes or no answer because I have follow ups on both sides. And no, I'm not telling you these because this isn't a Goosebumps pick your path book. If you answer honestly, you'll be okay and everything should make sense. And I will tell you all of what you need to know about why I'm doing what I'm doing. I just cant now.

Anyways the bolded quote is a paradox. You were a suspect the previous day (debate this all you want but you were by many people for good reasons) and you are tied to two pieces of information from the night. You say that you don't want impunity, but yet you set yourself up as an exception to the goal you just wanted? All because you think you have answered everything by claiming a power role and want to move on. But, and insert sarcasm here, you don't want an exception. I swear to god man, you are literally being Patrick.

That's the whole point of everything here. Once you wake up and see half the town is lynching you, even after you bring decent reasoning for defense that convinces some of the more experienced players (like Jalmont, fate), you start to get paranoid. Spiffy can confirm this

Pretty much what I am getting from this wording and based on your actions in being reluctant to claim is that you lied about being a power role to save your own ass? In this game, some villagers are going to have to die to protect others. And some are going to have to die to give the rest valuable information. You got paranoid, claimed a power roll to save yourself, and are now trying to cover that up with these self righteous acts. You didn't care about the mafia having information on who was a power role when you made the claim. So you saying you care now doesn't hold ANY water in your sinking boat. Only reason you are saying that is because 1) you are a villager and you lied about a power role so you could keep playing, and dont want to get caught in the lie because it will mean another miss lynch or 2) you are mafia and lied because that's literally what you want to do, and dont want to get subjected to the villages criticisms for your Jalmost-esque weirdness.

Also, Spiffy might have been paranoid but he though rationally and convinced us not to vote for him based on his play and his reasoning. He didn't resort to claiming he was a power role, but then had to go be somewhere else in 10 minutes, assuring he wouldn't have to claim and making a plausible enough explanation to avoid suspicion.

Finally, and this is a big point:

Did you ever bother to do this?? Almost on every tournament scheduling I've mentioned my timezone and proposed weekends as my available days. Honestly I don't know why you need me to prove this to you.

You were never under fire for telling a lie about your time zone. It helps to explain why you werent posting and gives you a very legitimate reason to possibly skate by. However let me point this out right now. None of us has changed our schedules, yet you have been one of the most vocal and talkative of the group. Where was this day 1? Where was this passion and self motivation to question people and give your opinions?

You seem to be using your time zone as a shield. It's a legitimate excuse that you can use to make us seem that how you play is based on a natural reason, when in fact you are purposely not contributing because you figured out you have a natural defense should you be called out. The whole thing about "where was this passion and this level of movtiation" supports this. So does how you weasel your way out of the lynch by going "oh yeah I know it's moments before the deadline but guys I'm a power role but I dont want to tell you my role. And wow, look at that time difference I got to go to bed good luck. *fake snore* "

I am letting you know this now. You using your time zone as an excuse is not a valid strategy/defense in the future to me. If we get to another god damned deadline and you pull this nonsense again I will do everything in my power to get you targeted. You need to learn how to play and contribute DESPITE your limitations instead of making excuses and doing chickenshit actions BECAUSE of your limitations and knowing you can get away with it.

Spiffy Fatecrashers vonFiedler Amianki rssp1 for comments on all of this. Other people can comment too, but these are the players who have been the most involved and logical. And whose thoughts/strategies I value the most.
 
Like I said before, I agree 100%. However, clearly everyone else doesn't recognize how horrific it is that HD can hide behind this claim but if this fairly pointless argument persists we kind of lose sight of what we should be doing, which is talking about things OTHER than this too.

Anyway, I've been trying to piece together scum teams in my head and Serious Bananas can fit in a lot of them because he has done no accusing of his own for the most part. He comes into this day really only theorizing about why LightWolf died, and if anything is posting to seem contributional, it's that.

Unvote PokeguyNXB (who still should be pressured more in my opinion)
Vote Serious Bananas

Yeah, not the greatest argument against him, but I don't want him to slip through the cracks as he seems to be doing the bare minimum and getting by on it. I want to hear opinions on him from vonFiedler Celever rssp1 Haunted Diamond ButteredToast Fatecrashers basically everybody actually.

And just fucking look into him, don't say some BS like "omg Spiffy is asking people questions to seem contributional" because that gets us no where.
 
I said my piece on "hiding behind a claim" on the last page Spiffy ButteredToast

It needn't necessarily be addressed, but don't ignore the fact that I've said something on the matter. Other than that, I would not be against an HD lynch. Tbh, I have a sneaking suspicion that HD is mafia and that Spiffy is Courier (I have no idea if we're supposed to lynch the Courier or not, mind you).

I am interested in Serious Bananas and PokeguyNXB for the same reasons other are, but as I said before, "slipping by without contribution" is only really something we can go after with safety by Day 3. That's how I feel anyway. It's a terribly cliche lynch excuse, and such targets rarely defend themselves. We already fucked this up once with Cancerous.
 
5:16 (my time)
I make a post that is still arguing for a Spiffy lynch. At this point it seems unlikely, but I still do it. Meanwhile, my vote is on Haunted Diamond, as it seems that lynch might actually work at that point. At the time, only three votes are on Cancerous.

Between 5:54 and about 8:14, a slim two hours, four votes pile onto Cancerous, hammering it. Unless you think I'm literally glued to my computer chair, this doesn't seem like an unreasonable span of time to be doing anything else.

When I get on, skim posts, it is not looking good for Cancerous. So I make a post again condemning Spiffy (suggesting a better lynch) while talking about how weak a lynch against Cancerous is. At seven votes, clearly weak means weak as in reasons to lynch him, not odds of succeeding.

So yes, as a matter of fact, as soon as was possible, I addressed the lynch. I doubt it is to your standards, but if it was, I doubt people would have been more inclined to listen.

wait dude i thought everything i was saying had been a lie 8)

not really, you didn't take a definitive stand against the lynch, you just said it was "really weak." i don't know what that means. a lynch can be "weak" but still acceptable. i think that a villager in your position who thought that cancerous lynch was "really weak" would've had directly addressed the fact that in two hours four lynch votes were piled onto Cancerous instead of just mentioning it in passing in a conversation that wasn't especially relevant to what was happening regarding the lynch votes at the time.

Hmm, more incorrect things. My thesaurus doesn't have those listed as synonyms for glib and sarcastic.

Your propensity to call everything I say "incorrect" is an example of an emotional reaction because your logic on calling me "incorrect" is based on your emotions and not actually any rational evidence. Being excessively sarcastic when there is no need to/your other posts aren't similarly sarcastic is being emotional.

What is your point? I didn't realize that I was the only clean townsfolk and that I had that much power and responsibility. Dodging responsibility for lynching him is one thing, trying to imply that it is my fault?

Moving towards extremes is another example of being excessively emotional because only with an overly emotional reaction would anyone ever conclude that "[you were] the only clean townsfolk and that [you] had that much power and responsibility". I didn't imply anything about his "lynch" being your fault. As I've said, I think it's strange that you did not seem that interested in moving away from a Cancerous lynch considering that you explicitly made it a point today to say that you were strongly against the lynch and that you demanded everyone to explain why they voted Cancerous.

Your irrational and emotional reaction to a post that wasn't even meant to explicitly call you out as mafia is striking to me.
 
vonFiedler Why is it safe on Day 3 as opposed to this day?

If we don't pressure them now we won't have anything to go off of on Day 3, which increases the possibility of a mislynch at that time.

Seriously probably less than one third of the game is actually doing anything proactive at all. Everyone else is really just content with laying back and seeing what happens. People keep saying that Day 1 is something we need to use to scumhunt further but no evidence has been presented from Day 1 to make a compelling case against anyone.

I'm not just going to be content with two thirds of the game not participating until Day 3.

Also More Cowbell we should really get a sub in for Ullar. We can't just have an inactive slot for 2 days of a 15 player NOC game.
 
Ullar will most likely be replaced by UncleSam; he can't be as active as most of you either, but it's better than Ullar's activitu right now. Once I have definitive confirmation I will sub US in.
 
i was under the assumption that the courier was the wolf for this game? i'd assume the courier and the mafia have alternate night kills or something

anyways i do think that confusion about roles does harm the mafia more than the village, but then again haunted already claimed that he's a power role so can he really use 'i'm trying to confuse the mafia' as a valid defense, there's a lot of questions that come to my mind regarding what would happen if haunted did claim, like would we believe him, how would he prove it, but at this point it's just me overthinking stuff and vonfiedler would describe it as WIFOMy

all serious bananas has really done so far is ask why we think lightwolf was killed, which to me seemed like an attempt to get discussion that was a dead end, it sort of reminds me of how cancerous wanted amianki's opinion on moi which was another dead end question, i know some of us, including myself, based our lynch around this sort of attempt to contribute and we all know how that turned out

pokeguynxb is a frustrating case cos he's got the convenient excuse of 'everything i want to say has been said so far, and if i make a big post i'll look scummy'. i don't buy this argument, because even if you express previously covered points in your words at least you're showing you're thinking critically about them, rather than just sitting back with no pressure whatsoever, i hate how much i sound like a teacher lecturing a lazy student but there you go
 
I will fully admit to having been lazy today and don't really want to read in depth right now. I'll do it in the morning. I did briefly reskim the earlier pages of Day 1 to see where the Cancerous pressure came from but it all came from people who I think are at least fairly townie? Mafia is hard.

Wrt HD claiming or not, I'm changing my mind on it because I think the fact that HD succeeded despite claiming that he had a role that mafia just left him alone with a dead Safeguard? Even if they didn't want to kill him, hooking him should be a pretty obvious choice. He also looks like he's playing super defensively on the last page just at a skim. It also feels like he's kind of holding the game hostage by waiting on it now because we probably won't be able to make a decision today without hearing his claim anyway, so it's probably best to just get it out of the way at this point.
 
UncleSam is unable to sub in right now, and so are Acklow and Walrein. That means we are without subs, so I can't sub out Ullar right now. If any of you know of any (potential) subs, please let me know.
 
Alright i'm really sorry but it's a massive pain in the ass to move stuff from one page to another (for some reason the draft doesn't save over >_>) so i'm just going to be posting my stuff one page at a time. (as in, responding to a page in its own post)

Just going to say in advance that most of my knowledge in this post is based on what i've read (everything before the post I quote; i've been skimming so I understand the general topic, but i've been saving reading the posts in depth till now) so i'm apologizing in advance if I repeat stuff.

"Hi everybody! I'm the village announcer! While I'm sad to see the Safeguard go, judging by how the day went, it could so easily have been me instead, so here's hoping we don't repeat the same mistakes tomorrow!"

I'm apparently "post restricted", plus this all looks like a set up.
I'm confused, Haunted has been posting quite a lot, so did he lie here or misinterpret what was told to him?

Anyway the first order of business should be obvious.

Cancerous was a bad lynch. He was always a bad lynch. The notion that he was "helping but not really" on day 1, when at least one player was literally inactive enough to be subbed out, was beyond forced. Especially when we should have been lynching Haunted Diamond.

Although I'm sure the question on everyone's mind is:
Who is the announcer? HD said that he'd show off his role, and the announcement talked about getting almost lynched, so he could be clean right now.
iirc the reasoning was that he came out of nowhere to provide something that was helpful to the sub but nobody else, and that that's a scummy thing to do. Essentially, he had contributed nothing until the summary and the way I saw it (and i'm assuming most others) was that he was trying to appear helpful while not actually being helpful.
Also, I remember someone getting pressured by others for role fishing, and if it was von, whoops, but isn't the latter part of this also role fishing?
 
Moving towards extremes is another example of being excessively emotional because only with an overly emotional reaction would anyone ever conclude that "[you were] the only clean townsfolk and that [you] had that much power and responsibility". I didn't imply anything about his "lynch" being your fault. As I've said, I think it's strange that you did not seem that interested in moving away from a Cancerous lynch considering that you explicitly made it a point today to say that you were strongly against the lynch and that you demanded everyone to explain why they voted Cancerous.

Jalmont, you have absolutely zero capacity to recognize humor over the internet. I realize it's a common problem, but you are the worst. Everytime I crack a joke at your expense, or say something that goes over your head, your reaction is "don't hit me daddy" (that is also a joke).

My posts anger you because they call you out. Since you are angry, you project those feelings onto me. It is beyond stale at this point.

Spiffy said:
vonFiedler Why is it safe on Day 3 as opposed to this day?

If we don't pressure them now we won't have anything to go off of on Day 3, which increases the possibility of a mislynch at that time.

Seriously probably less than one third of the game is actually doing anything proactive at all. Everyone else is really just content with laying back and seeing what happens. People keep saying that Day 1 is something we need to use to scumhunt further but no evidence has been presented from Day 1 to make a compelling case against anyone.

I'm not just going to be content with two thirds of the game not participating until Day 3.

Day 3 is maybe a bit arbitrary, but in my experience it feels right. It's easy to go day 1 or even day 2 and feel like you have nothing worth contributing. By day 3 the player base has thinned and more things have happened, so everyone has to be able to contribute.

I'm not saying I don't have a problem with their behavior or that they shouldn't be pressured, but it's an easy lynch against players inexperienced enough to defend themselves. Get on them for it today, encourage them to contribute, but lynch people for something more substantial if possible is all I ask.

rssp1 said:
Also, I remember someone getting pressured by others for role fishing, and if it was von, whoops, but isn't the latter part of this also role fishing?

Spiffy was the one who got pressured a lot. Many folks did so, including me. I do not believe that confirming who is announcer is role fishing, as announcer is a very weak role. Conversely, I've said my piece on how if he is another role we have no reason to be asking what it is. I realize there are different schools of thought on whether the announcer should declare themselves or not, I buy some of the reasoning, but I'm still not sure. The announcer has yet to reveal themselves at any rate, and that's really their business at this point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top