I think Knights' content can be summed up by "beating around the brush", the only thing that caught my attention is his case against Shubaka which was interesting, rest feels like going circles and giving townreads. Doesn't look like anyone agrees with me about the Knights lynch, even Texas who had been suspecting him d1 iirc and didnt want to lynch King back then which I'd like him to explain.
King doesn't look like as bad a lynch as Haruno was since it will give some info but I still feel like it's not as informative as Knights/Ullar, will settle for it if it comes down to it but I won't lynch Leet/shubaka/FH unless someone explains how it would bring as much info on Ullar/King.
King doesn't look like as bad a lynch as Haruno was since it will give some info but I still feel like it's not as informative as Knights/Ullar, will settle for it if it comes down to it but I won't lynch Leet/shubaka/FH unless someone explains how it would bring as much info on Ullar/King.