i mean leet self-hammered and the l-1 vote was the jkwhich considering that would mean there were 5 town not voting should tell you how ridiculous an idea that is
what? literally everyone on that wagon except me is flipped how am i trying to give town cred to people lolstill, leet self-hammering means there are at minimum 5 villagers not voting him, possibly 6, and only one of those could have voted him to later hammer him
so 4+ town couldn't have
i do believe both other scum would sit on leet that day with the way josh was pushing for him to be lynched so hard
look at the towncred you're trying to give the people who WERE on the wagon lol
there was no counterwagon for them to be onthe point i'm making is that it takes some serious mental gymnastics to expect a 7 vote lynch to contain 3 scum when they're already down one on the d3 wagon
and why was there no counterwagon? why would the scum commit to staying on leet? why would both scum have begun targeting him on previous days? why did one of the scum not unvote and let a towny replace them?there was no counterwagon for them to be on
where do you think they will be?
josh said we were lynching leet that day and blah blah
ID was the only place one of them could be and ID himself sure af wasn't going to be there lol
scum with no counterwagon as the day's lynch is a good af place for the other two to be voting
lol why do you think i only had lightwolf in my lynchpool (and now knights)1. Hawkie
3. Blazade->Lightwolf
5. KnightsofCydonia
13. Texas Cloverleaf
14. Flyhn->Ullar->Yeti
15. Aubisio->Da Letter El->Fort Colorcastle
17. shubaka17->Empoof
i think we can mostly agree its not hawkie or fort and idk about the rest of yall but i would think its also not me judging from my id-leet interactions (i know it isnt but w/e)
that gives us a pool of knights/lw/texas
7 ppl left = 6 --> 5 --> 4 --> 3 and it's lylo
so fortunately we can PoE lynch all 3 of them i think?