how dare you slight the masterful scum performance that was lovers mafia????
-
Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
2018 recap
- Thread starter jalmont
- Start date
can i like this post more than once
1. I can't really confirm that statement because again I didn't play but that seems hard to believe on the basis that only one mafia was lynched and the other two mafia weren't really ever in danger of being lynched (from my quick look through). I'm guessing my idea of a "game-changing" event is a little grander than yours (I don't consider "x going from thinking a to b" as something that is game-changing if that's your definition).
2. Empoof was not close to solving the game in any of his posts. Asek wasn't really close to solving the game either although he was closer.
3. Town definitely did not have a good game. Me and DLE had pretty legitimate criticisms of the town itt. Like I said before I would rather recap a game where people made mistakes and lost rather than people did nothing and lost. I can't say much for the "wacky" moments but from my glance it doesn't seem like anything occurred that was consequential enough to significantly affect the results of the game.
I think a lot of this honestly comes down to the fact that I remember one game because I played in it (and did well) and you remember the other because you played well in it (and did well). I am totally fine with including both. If you feel like it has its merits then I'm ok to do both. (or you can always write it XD)
2. Empoof was not close to solving the game in any of his posts. Asek wasn't really close to solving the game either although he was closer.
3. Town definitely did not have a good game. Me and DLE had pretty legitimate criticisms of the town itt. Like I said before I would rather recap a game where people made mistakes and lost rather than people did nothing and lost. I can't say much for the "wacky" moments but from my glance it doesn't seem like anything occurred that was consequential enough to significantly affect the results of the game.
I think a lot of this honestly comes down to the fact that I remember one game because I played in it (and did well) and you remember the other because you played well in it (and did well). I am totally fine with including both. If you feel like it has its merits then I'm ok to do both. (or you can always write it XD)
thank you
honestly that isn't the case for me. i won hope+1 and 2d3 as well but am not clamoring the inclusion of either. nuxl who wasn't even around in the forum at that time read through greek and thought very highly of the game so if you want an unbiased opinion use his?
I guess I didn't articulate my point well enough, but the idea is that you would prefer the game you did well in versus the game you didn't do well, not a preference between every game that you played in.
Anyways, like I said, I will just include both if that's how people feel. I am not convinced by what's been brought up that reinforcements was such an uninteresting game compared to greek. I have no problem recapping games that I don't feel strongly about. Thanks for the input.
Anyways, like I said, I will just include both if that's how people feel. I am not convinced by what's been brought up that reinforcements was such an uninteresting game compared to greek. I have no problem recapping games that I don't feel strongly about. Thanks for the input.
