Haven't read everything but I've read most at this point.
Honestly the fireworks with laurel were pretty fun, and it was good to see some emotion introduced to the game.
Laurel and AJ both played very good games.
AJ
-Played the middle amazingly well
-Was the main source of information for a lot of people
-Only received two votes total
-Never got targeted despite being a favorite to win
-Always played safe, never went for a big play
-Deathly afraid of rocks the entire game
-Got Drookez to sheep him all game
Laurel
-Played one sided and dishonest
-Created a lot of enemies
-Made final 3 despite all of this with an impressive immunity run
Laurel played a very good game, and would be a "favorite" if the fans/favorites/fumblers theme is ever run again.
AJ's though... even without my friendship bias, was on another level.
2 votes.
All game.
He also was on the right side of nearly every vote.
He had the perfect social game.
However... Laurel was quietly an immunity challenge threat, and that counts for something...
I think it would have been better for Laurels game if they hadn't thrown challenges to NOT appear as a threat, because they needed a truly dominant challenge run, not just the small one at the end, to compete with AJ's social game.
Laurel also created some extremely loyal followers which is hard to do
I think everyone on the jury is really tired of hearing whydon list why laurel should win 999 times, and I've honestly been tempted to not ready anything and vote AJ due to whydon's incessant pestering.
That wouldn't be right though, so I've read most of the posts and all the statements.
I'm a bit torn, but I feel like I have to give into my bias a little, people with great social games that make it to the end usually win a lot because they made friends instead of enemies on the island.
You can do all the right things in survivor... and still lose... and laurel made a lot of mistakes... while AJs game was... perfect.
Look at the Brains/Beauty/Brawn season (the Kaoh Rong one).
Aubry was the best player in the final 3...
She played an amazing game...
When it came time to vote though... the jury chose Michelle because her social game was better.
However in this game in the AJ vs Laurel debate... AJ played a perfect game while Laurels had flaws... and unlike Michelle in KR Laurel does NOT have the better social game, in fact, Laurel did pretty badly with the social game. I don't mind the smack talk, I thought it was fun, but that alienates normal voters, and I'm pretty sure it alienated Cleo as well. You can't do that, and win. Especially not against someone who played a perfect game.
Change my mind. I'm open to discussion, but it's going to be difficult too. AJ played really well, and played all of us.