• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

NOC Rand+++ Mafia [GAME OVER | Zombies/Jester/Lyncher/Survivor Win]

Texas is wanting FILO when it was FIFO.
Under your current system if Dusk and I are opposing wagons and the votes go 1-0 Texas, 2-1 Dusk, 3-2 Texas, 4-3 Dusk, 4-4 tie than Texas is the Lynch despite Dusk being the most recent lynch leader

This is nonsensical and gives scum disproportionate power in controlling the vote via ties
 
Under your current system if Dusk and I are opposing wagons and the votes go 1-0, Texas 2-1, Dusk 3-2, 3-3 tie, than Texas is the Lynch despite Dusk being the most recent lynch leader

This is nonsensical and gives scum disproportionate power in controlling the vote via ties

It actually helps town because it gives scum incentive to park votes, and therefore be found out. Probably would've realised this if you were looking at it from a town perspective
 
It actually helps town because it gives scum incentive to park votes, and therefore be found out. Probably would've realised this if you were looking at it from a town perspective
I am looking at this from a town perspective, it's disadvantageous to town. Your conclusion is retarded to boot and I would find it interesting that your immediate rebuttal is a scum perspective were you not, you know, already outed as scum.
 
I am looking at this from a town perspective, it's disadvantageous to town. Your conclusion is retarded to boot and I would find it interesting that your immediate rebuttal is a scum perspective were you not, you know, already outed as scum.

Do you not think you have tunneled me too hard at this stage? Tbh I am kinda flattered you are willing to get lynched tomorrow in order to get me killed
 
Lol I think you're town and I really wish you weren't
At last ty
Perspective slip

Town dusk wouldn't feel relief if he thought I town read him he'd press and think I was backtracking
Dusk has been pushing this narrative he's created about a scum slip and has been hammering me relentlessly and trying to convince people I'm scum

Yet his first reaction when he thinks I town read him is "oh finally"?

Uh uh, that's a reaction when you think - or know - someone is town


Y'all have ignored everything else, this is so clear, so blatant, you have to acknowledge it

vote Duskfall

For the late comers

A hard scum slip, dusk can't defend himself and his reaction over the following two pages has been effectively to give up if you watch his tone because he knows he got caught

Clear, actionable information. Lynch Duskfall.
 
Hurry up and fucking die, this isn't a tunnel, I accurately scum read you and then caught you out in a scum slip. That's not a tunnel that's good town play. Hurry up and die.
 
For the late comers

A hard scum slip, dusk can't defend himself and his reaction over the following two pages has been effectively to give up if you watch his tone because he knows he got caught

Clear, actionable information. Lynch Duskfall.

Why do you think all the people who have played with me most aren't voting me though? :thinking:
 
Under your current system if Dusk and I are opposing wagons and the votes go 1-0 Texas, 2-1 Dusk, 3-2 Texas, 4-3 Dusk, 4-4 tie than Texas is the Lynch despite Dusk being the most recent lynch leader

This is nonsensical and gives scum disproportionate power in controlling the vote via ties

It's chronological.

Example:

X - 2 (A, B)
Y - 2 (C, D)
Z - 2 (E, F)

Tie is broken by which of A, C, and E voted soonest (as determined by postnumbers). Let's say in this case, A voted on post #63, C voted on Post #50, and E voted on post #82. This makes Y the wagon under lynch threat. If C unvotes or votes off the wagons, X becomes the new lynch threat wagon because A voted before E.
 
And yes, it's a system prone to derpswings. Playing with this system, I myself have lost track of chronology and shifted off a lynch threat wagon I was leading. But I find it easy to track wagon shifts with it since I can doublecheck lynch threat by comparing isos.
 
It's chronological.

Example:

X - 2 (A, B)
Y - 2 (C, D)
Z - 2 (E, F)

Tie is broken by which of A, C, and E voted soonest (as determined by postnumbers). Let's say in this case, A voted on post #63, C voted on Post #50, and E voted on post #82. This makes Y the wagon under lynch threat. If C unvotes or votes off the wagons, X becomes the new lynch threat wagon because A voted before E.
Yeah and that's foolish, it minimizes the effect of skillful play in coordinating competing wagons and incentivized vote parking with hamstrings one of towns only tools for scum hunting. It needs to be the chronology of B/D/F that determines the successful lynch

Town can't play the game if town can't vote freely.
 
I think asek is scum based on my meta read, one person voted with me, my other scum read jumps on the train. That's not a wagon built for success.


Duskfall is also scum and then explicitly scum slips. That's a wagon that will go through.
 
I think asek is scum based on my meta read, one person voted with me, my other scum read jumps on the train. That's not a wagon built for success.


Duskfall is also scum and then explicitly scum slips. That's a wagon that will go through.

Except you are the only one that thinks I scumslipped, seems like you are contradicting your whole reason on why my read on you was bad

Thanks for validating it though
 
Back
Top