I’m just shocked apricity took five posts to get his point across
it's been a while since i've seen someone who uses their own quote in their signatureI’m just shocked apricity took five posts to get his point across
oh, I saw my role pm by my second message lol, I had posted about ityou know that's a good point, I was TR'ing you based on your general vibes and the role pm thing but none of that matters if you haven't seen your role pm lmao
explain literally all your soft town reads, it looks like you are just forcing reads here, your soft scumreads are literally people who didn't continue talking
haha! good one!it's been a while since i've seen someone who uses their own quote in their signature
This is incontrovertibleVote: UncleSam
Please see the following spreadsheet to understand why: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zEq7m8XTxvRaD-iehUyqwYlqOqXyywBefiwrYJRqVHo/edit?usp=sharing
You are already doing too much
Talk about it !
explain literally all your soft town reads, it looks like you are just forcing reads here, your soft scumreads are literally people who didn't continue talking
oc games are fakeI'll have you know I won an OC game as scum.
i legitimately dont even remember how to analyze if someone's scum or town anymore, let alone how in the world i ever generated reads early d1 and how to transition out of the meme phase
if the names arent alignment indicative it's probably not that important/productive to claim what username we are
also lets mafia start to think about what tommy might turn various users into power-role wise
whileI have an idea in my mind as to your sequence of posts here that I hope you'll help me figure out. Did you catch up on the thread and THEN write all three posts, or did you write each post WHILE catching up on the thread?
vote nuxl
meta readis this indicative of you town reading a high degree of those active in thread (or at least supposed 'power players') and hence voting someone not in thread yet, or is that just a completely random vote?
OK I might just be omgusing you to some degree here but I find it more valuable for me to maybe express a somewhat unfair interpretation of your posts due to my biased perspective than to just say nothing but when I try to imagine somebody making those sequence of posts while catching up on the thread they seem much more performative than I would expect. Taken on its own your first post was that I was already doing too much, which okay yeah maybe, but it also 1.) leaves open the possibility or even expectation that the trend of doing too much will continue. 2.) plays into the narrative your next two posts are building. You then make a few fair but kinda surface level criticisms of my posts that don't really require any work on your part and then leave.
Conveniently, you show back up mentioning other people in thread almost instantly (<5 minutes) after I mention your name after around two hours of your last post.
game
CaffeineBoost what are your thoughts on HydrogenHydreigon ?
with that being said
vote CaffeineBoost
hmm probably yeah I wanted to pressure him a bit more to see if he'd implode but if you're gonna tr him there's prob no point. unvote
What the fuck is this bullshit