In English, what if C always made a hard sound and K didn't exist?

1680569175125.jpeg
 
Liz: Jenna accused me of trying to destroy her because her lines didn't have any K sounds, which she thinks is the funniest sound

Pete: Oh my God. My cousin Karl crashed his car. And now he is in a coma at the Kendall Clinic.
 
C is now going to take revenge on all the letters that copied its sound (K, Q, X)
C is actually the copier of K in this case. In the Greek alphabet, the sound you describe as "hard C" was originally represented by Kappa (K), and C itself originates more closely to gamma (Γ) which you can see how it looks like half a C, which was originally used to represent the /g/ sound.

The next step forward would be into the Etruscan alphabet, where a more C-like symbol for gamma would be used for both the /k/ and /g/ sounds.
1680584427402.png

The Roman/Latin alphabet would be derived from the Etruscan alphabet and inherited this double meaning of C. It wasn't until Spurius Carvilius Ruga came along to invent the letter G by adding a tail onto the C to differentiate /g/ and /k/.

So to answer your thread's question, if K never existed and C always made the /k/ sound instead, then the letter G probably wouldn't look like a C with a tail because it wouldn't have been based on C, and there would probably just be another letter that would end up being used for the same purpose as the original Latin C was in the place of K and G to represent the /g/ sound, and alt-universe C (in the role of Kappa) and neo-G (in the role of gamma) might have been merged together in the Etruscan alphabet to become neo-C in the end anyway, so alt-C would be the equivalent to K and your name would be IhateletterC and you would be praising neo-C as superior to alt-C in this alternate reality. Truly, there is no end to this vicious cycle.

Sources: https://ultrasaurus.com/2003/08/the-history-of-the-letter-c/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C
 
Last edited:
C is actually the copier of K in this case. In the Greek alphabet, the sound you describe as "hard C" was originally represented by Kappa (K), and C itself originates more closely to gamma (Γ) which you can see how it looks like half a C, which was originally used to represent the /g/ sound.

The next step forward would be into the Etruscan alphabet, where a more C-like symbol for gamma would be used for both the /k/ and /g/ sounds.
View attachment 505041
The Roman/Latin alphabet would be derived from the Etruscan alphabet and inherited this double meaning of C. It wasn't until Spurius Carvilius Ruga came along to invent the letter G by adding a tail onto the C to differentiate /g/ and /k/.

So to answer your thread's question, if K never existed and C always made the /k/ sound instead, then the letter G probably wouldn't look like a C with a tail because it wouldn't have been based on C, and there would probably just be another letter that would end up being used for the same purpose as the original Latin C was in the place of K and G to represent the /g/ sound, and alt-universe C (in the role of Kappa) and neo-G (in the role of gamma) might have been merged together in the Etruscan alphabet to become neo-C in the end anyway, so alt-C would be the equivalent to K and your name would be IhateletterC and you would be praising neo-C as superior to alt-C in this alternate reality. Truly, there is no end to this vicious cycle.

Sources: https://ultrasaurus.com/2003/08/the-history-of-the-letter-c/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C
Take a look at this video
 
Last edited:
Take a look at this video
There is this video which explains that K actually copied C

1680586203108.png

This video fully supports my points.
Kappa was the original character to represent the /k/ or "hard C" sound.
Gamma was the original character to represent /g/.
1680586456396.png

C is the result of taking these original characters and splicing them together in a fusion that came afterwards in this unholy genealogy.
You can't say that K copied C's sound when this clearly shows that K came first and C is just a cheap copy.
 
And look at this other guy that understnads, K is the cheap copy?
View attachment 505044
I'm not sure what you're reading. The comment is saying they hated C for freeloading by taking up multiple sounds, and realized that they actually hate the "uncredited original K sounds", admitting that K is the original sound and that its credit is being taken away by people like you attributing /k/ to "hard C".

Just because this comment is being negative to the letter K doesn't mean it's agreeing that K is the copy, they just don't like its sound.
 
Back
Top