NOC eli loves matrices game thread [Game Over, Town Win!]

Lady Salamence said:
I don’t really have any suspicions on anyone right now. I’m glad Psy has been un-caps-locking more, they don’t strike me as someone I’m worried about being scum right now. Celever strikes me as less scumread and more ‘fucking with psy’, either genuinely or as a ‘bit’ (also now has me concerned for my d2 activity bc as I’m typing they’ve said I’ve promised greatness d2 on which I definitely don’t expect to live up to, nor do I think I promised). Don’t have much of a read on Caff other than thinking if he was scum surely he does something more than just side commentary. My interactions with Vizh have been pretty pedestrian in my eyes. I’m super confused where these group-wide realiti town reads are coming from because I’ve gotten zero leaning from them yet.
Click to expand...
As for the rest of the post, I would say that Caff pretty much always assumes the commentator role, though I actually don't recall if I have played a game where he was mafia.

Realiti is a player who tends to post little and high quality, and my vibe without backlogging is that that is applicable here, though it also kind of the optimal playstyle for a player to have should they roll mafia. I do think it's plausible realiti townread was bandwagoned on for towncred groupthink "look I'm one of you guys" reasons by at least one mafia, though that would be NAI for realiti themself.
 
Celever said:
As for the rest of the post, I would say that Caff pretty much always assumes the commentator role, though I actually don't recall if I have played a game where he was mafia.

Realiti is a player who tends to post little and high quality, and my vibe without backlogging is that that is applicable here, though it also kind of the optimal playstyle for a player to have should they roll mafia. I do think it's plausible realiti townread was bandwagoned on for towncred groupthink "look I'm one of you guys" reasons by at least one mafia, though that would be NAI for realiti themself.
Click to expand...

realiti itt being described as high quality is odd to me, I just read through their posts and that wouldn’t be what I used to describe them idk
 
I have limited time what do I put into my last post of the phase. oh yes let me note these two specific posts from one player and give no other reads. and this furthers discussion in no way because I wont be around to see it! like no that's not real
 
Psypsypsypsypsythe said:
and the thing is caffs post about my mad ramblings on vizh is genuinely very scummy because it sets out to undermine the post without actually pushing forth any discussion around it. it completely shuts down discussion and that's scum behavior but if I point that out its gonna be oh there goes silly psy saying weird stuff again! like does that not make sense????
Click to expand...
I'm not trying to undermine the points behind your posts. I actually think some of the stuff you've put in this thread makes sense. The issue is that you tend to post a lot of guesses and throw a lot of darts in the hope that one of them will hit.

I am a shitposter, I like to shitpost. I see you in the thread doing this and getting ALL CAPS MAD AT PEOPLE TALKING TO YOU ABOUT YOUR PLAYSTYLE AAAAAAAAAAAAAH and I think "that there's a gold mine"

Idk why you're SR'ing me this time around (though it's possible you SR'd me last time, it's difficult to remember exactly what your mindset was/is at any given time) when I've poked as much fun at your berserk posting sprees in the previous game. The only difference I can see is that this time I'm a wagon.
 
Lady Salamence said:
realiti itt being described as high quality is odd to me, I just read through their posts and that wouldn’t be what I used to describe them idk
Click to expand...
Interesting, I ISOed him myself to confirm my vibe and I do still think 285+ are of reasonably high quality. Thread progression before it was cool, large amounts of novel content. Like with the gamestate being as it was, he has provided content that forms the seeds of links with other players and given in-roads for insight (that were largely not taken up by the rest of us but hey).
 
CaffeineBoost said:
I'm not trying to undermine the points behind your posts. I actually think some of the stuff you've put in this thread makes sense. The issue is that you tend to post a lot of guesses and throw a lot of darts in the hope that one of them will hit.

I am a shitposter, I like to shitpost. I see you in the thread doing this and getting ALL CAPS MAD AT PEOPLE TALKING TO YOU ABOUT YOUR PLAYSTYLE AAAAAAAAAAAAAH and I think "that there's a gold mine"

Idk why you're SR'ing me this time around (though it's possible you SR'd me last time, it's difficult to remember exactly what your mindset was/is at any given time) when I've poked as much fun at your berserk posting sprees in the previous game. The only difference I can see is that this time I'm a wagon.
Click to expand...
no you're not going to backpedal and this isnt even addressing what I said
 
Schiavetto said:
Hi I'm at work and today has been a coverage nightmare so I don't have much time (I'll tell you all about it when I get home and blogpost about it though) but I just want to say that #426 and #429 from Psy looks like TMI, if anyone feels diffithey should speak up.
Caff is my most confident town atm.
Click to expand...
Can anyone tell me what TMI means (I don’t think it makes sense as too much info)?
 
the answer btw is that I'm led to believe theres a scum intent behind the poking fun to make the posts easy to dismiss and make everyone just thing oh there he goes being stupid but let's not forget that last game I was right on aura and I was right on hal and yes I was wrong on a lot of ideas but EVERYONE is always wrong on things so to discredit everything I say and joke about it without any other engagement just a foolish way to play or its s scummy way to play!
 
Celever said:
I said disregard activity tells because they're non-alignment indicative. I said the same to you earlier in the thread about iirc TBZ.
Click to expand...
I 100% disagree, as long as there's a good baseline. In this case, comparing people to their own past games would be fine with me. Thread's moving fast enough now that I can't tell if that's what you meant, though.

(and wow, +6 pages just when I'm playing 3 rounds of overwatch ...)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top