Your argument is you jumped on the OM vote Just Because It Was There and then didn't leave the vote because you liked Schia's later-provided reasoning?yes and i explained this in the post youre quoting
your pitch is to literally disregard the entire game except for the last hour of d1?Just in terms of the wagonomics, voting Schia out instead of Psy, if we are basing the vote today primarily on yesterday's wagon, does not make sense from a game theory standpoint. That doesn't mean we can't do it, but we have to bring in other analysis that is not so much to do with the last hour of D1 for it to be a justifiable move.
yeahYour argument is you jumped on the OM vote Just Because It Was There and then didn't leave the vote because you liked Schia's later-provided reasoning?
No, as stated at the bottom of the page my preference is in fact for us not to do that. But the flash wagon on Schia means that other people are doing that so the post is still very relevant.your pitch is to literally disregard the entire game except for the last hour of d1?
I mean this still leaves you open to the obvious allegation that you were jumping on any wagon that wasn't Caff to see what would stick.yeah
well the thing is im townier than schia across all sections of the game so thats why theyre being voted over meNo, as stated at the bottom of the page my preference is in fact for us not to do that. But the flash wagon on Schia means that other people are doing that so the post is still very relevant.
It was anti-Caff wagon players and dynamics pro-OM wagon players and dynamics, not pro-OM case.ill concede on vizh pro caff but ls only votes om with an understanding of why hes being voted so its less mindless pro caff to me
i mean im open to it but that doesnt mean thats what happenedI mean this still leaves you open to the obvious allegation that you were jumping on any wagon that wasn't Caff to see what would stick.
no it was pro om caseIt was anti-Caff wagon players and dynamics pro-OM wagon players and dynamics, not pro-OM case.
Yeah the issue is this isn't the progression they have since yesterday, at least not all of them. Schia was basically universal townread yesterday, which can be cause for concern, but leapfrogging has definitely taken place.well the thing is im townier than schia across all sections of the game so thats why theyre being voted over me
Unvote
Vote OM
ty for schia/psy for providing the logic, gonna throw my lot in with that i think over the caff votes
It was to do with wagons (these are sequential posts)dont feel great that the caff wagon's structure (the tbz/realiti/m24 3) have mostly been in and out w.r.t. actually posting but that might just be me.
leapfrogging for good reason thoughYeah the issue is this isn't the progression they have since yesterday, at least not all of them. Schia was basically universal townread yesterday, which can be cause for concern, but leapfrogging has definitely taken place.
"ty for providing the logic" means it was related to the caseIt was to do with wagons (these are sequential posts)
And every other word in those two posts means it was related to the wagons. "ty for providing the logic" was politely thanking you for replying to their question."ty for providing the logic" means it was related to the case
This one? Yeah, I think it could easily have been theatre. It is uh, very difficult to prove or disprove theatre over text. I've had successful mafia theatre that is more elaborate than the exchanges between you and Caff in the past though.also this means celever thinks that interaction between me and caff was theater which is interesting because i dont think it reads that way
I advise against getting too involved in arguing with psy, it's bad for the blood pressure and just results in a dozen pages that don't get much done. Coutnerpoints to a few posts, sure. But a dozen pages of arguing doesn't do much, and as Psy pointed out (I agree here), it only benefits scum.Because it appeared and I anticipated you would try to make that (in my view misinterpret) the post in that way, my brain had the answer revved up and ready to go.
This one? Yeah, I think it could easily have been theatre. It is uh, very difficult to prove or disprove theatre over text. I've had successful mafia theatre that is more elaborate than the exchanges between you and Caff in the past though.
Of course I have to ask, how difficult do you think it would be for Psy to replicate his tone and style of weapons mafia as scum?So, looking at Vizh's posts... compared to my vote on CB, since I think that's the important one in this chronology...
I voted on page 30. Go back 2 pages for completeness. Slightly less than an hour backwards, just over an hour before deadline.
CB votes in self-preservation, then I join against CB.
Vizh is being active in this time. Many chances to vote and get OM in the lead, and this is after we learn first to reach the tie gets voted.
Instead, he waits a few minutes until after Celever joins the CB vote.
So, looking at it like that... I think the counterpoint about the chart is the only reason I may be able to support the CB + 1 other scum idea. Guess Schia's next on my list, because ... when I first planned this review, I expected to vote Vizh. When I saw some more replies, I changed to be more neutral.
Yet...
Now I town-lean Vizh. Psy seems like a repeat of weapons mafia (aggravating townie), LS owning her mistake made me re-think going after her...
Schiavetto why should we not vote you, who do you think the scum are, and all that stuff?