jalmont is convincing
there actually is some urgency, because again, if the poisoner is mafia and kills someone the night after next, we won't be able to do anything about it because the game will be over. similar to dusk's role, if the dusk is mafia and swaps the mayor to himself, we can't do anything about it and lose the game.
Presumably people play mafia because they believe they can "read" people better than randomly guessing. I tend to disagree with that, even moreso on day 1. Given the setup is open, I think we put town in a better position by strategically voting one of the roles we all agree will hold us back. I'm not even saying rand it, I'm saying, let's "find a scum" from a group of about 5 people.
fwiw I have my "reads" too but I don't see any reason why I should put more faith into them than anyone else's "reads"
Considering Psy launched on Tommy because he bothered to read Tommy's role after Tommy said he would use it, this distinction is incredibly blurry lolI think the psy vs dusk argument is probably the most important world to understand rn. After that please read my post on roles. Everything else is skippable. Happy to summarize the game for you if necessary
I don't think dusk was joking and I think it's unfair to penalize psy for that when his concern is much more valid. but i would concede there's a world in which a town player would see things like that IF they thought dusk was joking and psy truly was approaching it for an actual "policy because role exists" and not "policy because dusk said he's swapping all the roles regardless"
im not sure why that invalidates anythingConsidering Psy launched on Tommy because he bothered to read Tommy's role after Tommy said he would use it, this distinction is incredibly blurry lol
LS' overarching point was that by signing up to the game you were signing a contract that you would play in a game with Tommy's role. The fact that you didn't read the contract makes Jalmont's interpretation, that it was Tommy's specific behaviour that caused the fight, more difficult to put stock into. All Tommy's behaviour did was make you read the contract.im not sure why that invalidates anything
The delay makes the poisoner pretty hard for town to effectively use. If it's used 6-3 and ML to 4-3, we lose even if we vote correctly if the poisoner is wrong. That's way too much risk for me to be comfortable with. And that's ignoring the fact that mafia poisoner can use the ability while lying about idling, unless we track..in the same vein that poisoner is neg util i also think smth poisoner can be a controllable action LMAO
i do agree night actions being controlled is good tho j havent thought who would go where yet
FTR I don't think you're a bad mafia player lol I got town vibes from you early last game, and was ready to lock that in before the uh, the redcheckskip - yeah that's fair. dont have much to say in response other than "i perform badly on d1 consistently"
jalmont (673 just saw you post again) - i def see your arguments. i like your perspective more than psy, you're actually convincing/presenting the argument in an understandable/reasonable manner. im not super convinced that "we need to vote out XYZ role otherwise we lose the game if mafia rolled perfect roles" but i can see the logic there. i think that duskfall is town as a vibe currently and therefore im not inclined to vote him unless that's where town as a whole goes and currently it's too early for me to throw in with that wagon. my current only other genuine suspicion is on skip but as he's growing more active i'm becoming more comfortable with him and his posting. also, town players read town me as scum as a pattern and as a bad mafia player i only have patterns of previous games to go off of.
i believe people are told/should be told if they are poisoned, so like it will be outed anywayThe delay makes the poisoner pretty hard for town to effectively use. If it's used 6-3 and ML to 4-3, we lose even if we vote correctly if the poisoner is wrong. That's way too much risk for me to be comfortable with. And that's ignoring the fact that mafia poisoner can use the ability while lying about idling, unless we track..
i believe people are told/should be told if they are poisoned, so like it will be outed anyway
Considering it's open role CaffeineBoost can also just tell us here.be real cool if realiti could check with caff to confirm this for us
I am fine with this.motivator: ABSORBER or TRACKER or JAILKEEPER
Wait, jailkeeper would block the other roles from getting absorbed rightI am fine with this.
That’s fair, too. And good to know. I’m keeping my vote the same for now, as I’m going to sleep soon. But I’m leaning towards a Hal/M24 atm until they wake upskip - yeah that's fair. dont have much to say in response other than "i perform badly on d1 consistently"
M24 is very interesting, can you explain that one?That’s fair, too. And good to know. I’m keeping my vote the same for now, as I’m going to sleep soon. But I’m leaning towards a Hal/M24 atm until they wake up
That’s fair, too. And good to know. I’m keeping my vote the same for now, as I’m going to sleep soon. But I’m leaning towards a Hal/M24 atm until they wake up
this is so lol. aura is within his scum metaEnd of page 23 now. Confirming, Vote Psypsypsypsypsypsythe Not dealing with this D2. Mafia, if this vote fails, could you spend your NK to save everyone's sanity?