Metagame SV OU Metagame Discussion v2 [Update on Post #5186]

Status
Not open for further replies.
CTC cited Valiant, enamorus, and gholdengo as mons that Volcarona checked. So... you saying you think these guys are broken?

If Volcarona was the only thing stopping these Pokemon from being impossible to deal with, then yes, these Pokemon are obviously banworthy regardless of whether Volcarona is in the tier or not. If a single Pokemon is all that is keeping a threat in check, then that threat is broken. Being forced to use a specific Pokemon to deal with something is clearly unhealthy for the tier

I have never seen anyone argue that Volcarona is good for the tier before today, so why are people arguing this now, all of a sudden?
 
CTC cited Valiant, enamorus, and gholdengo as mons that Volcarona checked. So... you saying you think these guys are broken?


View attachment 525294
This is not new.
i don’t think you quite understand what “broken checking broken” means, so i will explain.

it is an invalid line of argument to suggest (as ctc & vertex do) that volcarona must stay in the metagame as a matter of necessity to hold back otherwise would-be problematic pokemon. this is because, if we assume, purely for the sake of argument that volcarona is broken & also that valiant may be broken were it not for volcarona’s presence, the correct tiering approach is to ban volcarona, and then ban valiant, should it turn out valiant was broken without volcarona around.

this is balancing/tiering 101 people, and it is a serious shame that the community at large, & prominent members either do not understand, or have forgotten.
 
So uhhhh, what beats Booster Val now?

Volc was one of the only things that could consistently come in on special Valiant sets over the course of the game, and it's really the only one that generates offensive momentum from doing so, rather than just being big and fat and sitting on it. Besides, Clod, Pex and Amoonguss hate Psyshock, Corv and Pex hate Tbolt, Dirge and Ghold hate Shadow Ball. Heatran is like the only new switch-in the tier has now, and remember that this thing can also destroy it with Fighting STAB. I also kinda think it needs CM much less now, since it doesn't really need it for any of its common checks besides Volc. It outspeeds everything, 4-attack sets basically just choose between hitting Corv or hitting Tran while outspeeding entire offensive teams, and Taunt sets or physical sets are dangerous a mix-up as ever. I'm trying to replace Volc in my builder and like, anything I pick to replace it as the Volc check gets beat by a coverage move even without Tera. I guess I'm never taking BandNite off my teams now because how else am I going to pressure this thing?
Iron Valiant needs Calm Mind in order to threaten Gholdengo with Shadow Ball; Mixed/Specially Defensive Gholdengo is massively underrated IMO - it deals with Enamorus better without sacrificing too much against Sneasler and ID-BPress Zamazenta-H:

252 SpA Iron Valiant Shadow Ball vs. 252 HP / 128+ SpD Gholdengo: 142-168 (37.5 - 44.4%) -- guaranteed 3HKO
252 Atk Sneasler Fire Punch vs. 252 HP / 96 Def Gholdengo: 156-184 (41.2 - 48.6%) -- guaranteed 3HKO
+2 252 Atk Tera Flying Sneasler Acrobatics (110 BP) vs. 252 HP / 96 Def Gholdengo: 169-200 (44.7 - 52.9%) -- 27.3% chance to 2HKO
0 Atk Zamazenta Crunch vs. 252 HP / 96 Def Gholdengo: 128-152 (33.8 - 40.2%) -- guaranteed 3HKO
252 SpA Enamorus Earth Power vs. 252 HP / 128+ SpD Gholdengo: 174-206 (46 - 54.4%) -- 53.1% chance to 2HKO
252 SpA Choice Specs Enamorus Earth Power vs. 252 HP / 128+ SpD Gholdengo: 260-308 (68.7 - 81.4%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Stealth Rock

Iron Valiant can't even profitably use Shadow Ball or Calm Mind against Skeledirge:

252 SpA Iron Valiant Shadow Ball vs. 248 HP / 252+ SpD Skeledirge: 144-170 (35 - 41.3%) -- guaranteed 3HKO

Hot dang, I keep figuring that Steel/Ghost and Fire/Ghost are great defensive types for role players in the current meta.

Now truck physical attacker Iron Valiant into both of these Ghosts and they will know fear. I once had to Tera my mixed defensive Gholdengo to beat a Booster Energy Iron Valiant who Swords Danced on the switch.
 
If Volcarona was the only thing stopping these Pokemon from being impossible to deal with, then yes, these Pokemon are obviously banworthy regardless of whether Volcarona is in the tier or not. If a single Pokemon is all that is keeping a threat in check, then that threat is broken.

I have never seen anyone argue that Volcarona is good for the tier before today, so why are people arguing this now, all of a sudden?
People feel blindsided that another quickban vote dropped less than a week after the last one with zero warning or foreshadowing or any discussion of what was going on. Even if Volcarona would get banned in an actual suspect, sideswiping everyone like this was quite literally the worst way to go about doing this. This wasn't Magearna or Eleki or bundle where it was so far above the rest of the power level. Volc existed in the tier since its inception so randomly QBing it halfway through the generation with zero warning feels odd. That's mostly it.
 
I thought the council was of the people, for the people? Do I need to drop the 'so fuck democracy' copypasta?

Volc was a high written in response to the last survey and a month ago people demanding he get tested and nothing has changed in regards to his game. We have this Meta for 3 months do we really want to waste a month of it testing volc.

Like I get it, this is new precedence and goes against what would of been the norm in the past, but this generation had been nothing but unprecedented. I would rather blitz through the unstable period get the Meta stable enough to test Tera and reintroduce stuff from there.
 
CTC cited Valiant, enamorus, and gholdengo as mons that Volcarona checked. So... you saying you think these guys are broken?

You gotta remember that those mons can be checked by other things ever with tera taken into account
Volcarona is HO's only tool against them, but most other playstyles tend to have far more ways to beat them instead of "throw a resist and QD on their switch, pray they don't have a way of dealing with a +1 rona"
 
Aside from how comically supervillain esque this and a certain other player's post is, I find it funny you can accuse people of a lack of metagame knowledge and then claim Volc's best days are behind it... When that couldn't be further from the truth? Many of its former best checks are harder to fit, and realistically still lost to a set it had. Heatran ceases being a check when tera exists and tera water Volc trolls rain teams.

Also you guys need to stop bitching about SS. It wasn't for everyone. But it wasn't at all a bad tier. And blaming council for shit like Espathra or the shed tail meta is absolutely goofy when that was a shitty situation no one liked. Lastly



Acting like a five year old instead of making a reasoned response does nothing for your argument. You're a great player, but don't act toxic just because you think you're right.

These are opinions i have formed over months of dominating the sv tour circuit. My teams have been involved in spl playoff games, ost top 8, stour playoffs, and currently have 3-4 sitting comfortably in top 20. If you want to call my opinion unsubstantiated when I literally said in my post I interviewed other top 20 players, I just have one thing to say:
Ill give u 50 bucks if you provide proof of top 100 ladder rank right now
 
People feel blindsided that another quickban vote dropped less than a week after the last one with zero warning or foreshadowing or any discussion of what was going on.
Again, I don’t like the precedent set by the Volcarona QB, but this is blatantly not true. Finch and the OU council have been actively posting about Volcarona in this thread multiple times over this past week saying they thought it was a problem and that they were going to vote on it, with Finch even outright stating he was gonna vote to ban it. It’s ok if people feel blindsided by the vote because not everyone keeps up with this thread or anything, but accusing the council of not communicating about it isn’t fair to them at all.
 
As I've mentioned in my previous post, I voted the way I did with the full intention to advocate for suspecting the targeted Pokemon in the future. I believe Volcarona deserves a suspect test, and I believe Urshifu-R deserves one too; however I personally recognize that, in spite of that, there are clear influences on both play and the building process that these Pokemon pose on the tier that I personally feel we would be better off avoiding during WCoP due to its high-level status and being a format entrenched in opportunity for players of different backgrounds to make their mark. I believe a stable metagame is important for that, and unfortunately there are just way too many problems with the tier to where I personally saw this approach as a necessary evil. Again, I will be advocating for suspect tests on these Pokemon to be freed at an opportune time.

You all have the right to express your frustrations and concerns regarding the recent decision, and we do not want to try and censor that by locking the thread like last time. However, blatant insults are not and never will be tolerated. Anybody who tries to belittle or attack others for their stance on the matter or demonstrating any kind of hostility toward others will be infracted going forward.

For a more constructive approach, I would implore you all to check out Finchinator's recent policy review post regarding tiering responses we have started to do going into this generation and how we can improve them, as we are human and are still learning how to adapt to Pokemon's new release frameworks. If you are upset about the current state of affairs, I implore that you read the thread and leave your thoughts there as it is the place to do so. Thanks!
 
These are opinions i have formed over months of dominating the sv tour circuit. My teams have been involved in spl playoff games, ost top 8, stour playoffs, and currently have 3-4 sitting comfortably in top 20. If you want to call my opinion unsubstantiated when I literally said in my post I interviewed other top 20 players, I just have one thing to say:
Ill give u 50 bucks if you provide proof of top 100 ladder rank right now
Just by curiosity why you aren't in the council?

Also having such great team doesn't give you a reason to be a a***hole
 
Oof man, still not there yet, though rn is the highest I've ever been on the ladder lol
NGL, I am only here because I stole some OP hazard stack team & will likely drop from top 500 the next time I start laddering.
see I like the transparency, and thats a decent enough spot to know the gist of the metagame. Now if youll post replays of unwinnable games or games in which volc is clearly an uncircumventable threat that undermines competitiveness, we can have a conversation. Im here to help, let me know when youre ready.
 
Volc was a high written in response to the last survey and a month ago people demanding he get tested and nothing has changed in regards to his game. We have this Meta for 3 months do we really want to waste a month of it testing volc.

We're going to waste a month testing zamazenta-H, likely before tera. :toast:

And yes, volc was 50 write-ins on the survey. Tera was 200. Which showed up on radar and got quickbanned? :pikuh:

There was clearly a correlation here, either they wanted volc or tera looked at (keyphrase: looked at, not banned) and the one that wasn't even super majority was what got voted and booted.

No one agrees with the council's priorities here, can we justify them and understand where they're coming from? Sure, but can we say it was the correct choice? That's what suspect test decide and this was one of those moments where it would've been significantly more important to hold off on a QB. You can't hold the community accountable cause the community had absolutely no say, you can only hold the few individuals accountable.
 
Last edited:
my take as an admittedly lower skill player (so dont take this as me implying its the One True Solution)

after wcop, tera suspect. while i'd normally be ok with waiting more, the current state of affairs is just gonna revolve around tera until the thing gets looked upon. I'd prefer immediately testing with team preview and voting to keep it or ban it, but thats just me not wanting to go through another 3 months of ppl arguing if thats enough or not, so maybe not the objectively good idea.

Regardless of tera suspect outcome, moth suspect test. Even if the results will obviously be 99% ban or whatever, the moth and community should get a say on it

Then suspect the dog or whatever. Or maybe dlc will be out by then and monkidori will break the tier. idk bro
 
Volc was a high written in response to the last survey and a month ago people demanding he get tested and nothing has changed in regards to his game. We have this Meta for 3 months do we really want to waste a month of it testing volc.

Like I get it, this is new precedence and goes against what would of been the norm in the past, but this generation had been nothing but unprecedented. I would rather blitz through the unstable period get the Meta stable enough to test Tera and reintroduce stuff from there.
My original post was in jest but now I do have something serious to say. Volc's definitely worthy of tiering attention but quickbanning it right now is a horrible idea. It's been an OU staple all generation (and for thirteen years prior, mind you). I won't claim that removing it will definitely make the tier worse but I think that it was a rash decision at the very least- for one, Iron Valiant just lost half of its best checks in the span of three days.
 
I think the best question to ask in response to this situation is how best do we balance the needs of tournament players with the needs of the rest of the OU playerbase? I’ll be honest, I have no clue what the right course of action in this case would be, but I don’t think that the Volcarona quickban was ideal.
 
I think the best question to ask in response to this situation is how best do we balance the needs of tournament players with the needs of the rest of the OU playerbase? I’ll be honest, I have no clue what the right course of action in this case would be, but I don’t think that the Volcarona quickban was ideal.

You don't, this is something every competitive game goes through; balance for low elo or balance for high elo.

The question is which one volcarona was targetted at cause a lot of high elo players don't agree with the ban, and the demand via the survey was mostly from low elo players to be looked at. The decision happened so suddenly cause of WCOP for sure, but I don't believe high elo was convinced volc was QB worthy at all, it just happened cause a specific cherry picked group deemed so, WCOP if anything in this only served to pressure the decision limiting their time frame to think it through. I have no doubt the council are good players, but personally biases get in the way of some things sometimes.
 
I think the best question to ask in response to this situation is how best do we balance the needs of tournament players with the needs of the rest of the OU playerbase? I’ll be honest, I have no clue what the right course of action in this case would be, but I don’t think that the Volcarona quickban was ideal.
Theyre players like us. They should receive the same support as any other player.

Given recent events, that support is none.
 
I strongly side with Vert and CTC ‘s stance on this whole situation and believe that there must be some administrative action in regards to this extremely sudden decision to quickban Volcarona DESPITE many consistently 1900-2000+ ladder players including myself voicing our disagreement in regards to the situation when the “volc quickbanned” was just a leak. I have concerns and question the future of the council if we are going around banning a ‘mon that wasn’t even on the radar a few days ago, and with Urshifu’s mediocre 3.0 rating in the recent tiering survey. I’ve explicitly stated in some of my other posts that I’ve found Volcarona to be manageable, however the prospect of it being able to break its normal counters like Heatran with tera blast ground/water is a very good feature for a Mon that is able to take over the game after only a quiver dance. There are very obvious counters to Volcarona, most notably priority moves (sucker punch, extreme speed, aqua jet etc) which are very reliable against Volcarona as a result of it having naturally very low bulk on the physical side. From experiences on all spectrums of the ladder (I am 2k on my climbing alt rn and 34-1 on another alt, making it to 1700 losing only ONCE), I can say that the most common Volcarona set in this Heatran/Tinglu fat-meta is a full offensive modest/timid Volcarona set with tera blast and no defense investment. There are some bulkier giga drain fiery dance sets however I find those to be very insignificant as they suck vs the many dragons and heatrans in the meta as of current. Volcarona is a very tempo reliant ‘Mon, to successfully set it up to be ready to sweep is easier said than done; +1 quiver rarely kills many mons and as the meta as of current is Spike Stacking fat teams with primary wall breaker of Dragapult/Urshifu, volc struggles to find an opportunity to set up since it will get revenged easily or whirlwinded as a last resort (+3 252 SpA Volcarona Bug Buzz vs. 252 HP / 252+ SpD Vessel of Ruin Ting-Lu: 470-554 (91.4 - 107.7%) -- 50% chance to OHKO). That’s a +3 offensive volc having a chance to not even OHKO a ting Lu… LOL

although I agree with volc being very oppressive in the current meta and being difficult to stop directly in its tracks due to tera blast, the move is so telegraphed by this point where if you send out heatran you should always scout for the tera blast with protect since it’s pretty obvious by this point. The prevalence of priority moves makes it not overwhelmingly difficult to revenge kill, and it is possibly to bait volc’s tera because it’s so obvious and this ends up as a disadvantage for the opponent. I understand both sides and while i do not think the Mon is personally banworthy, the fact that the council has jumped straight to the conclusion of a BAN is just utterly ridiculous; a suspect, which many players have voiced for, is not even being considered for; it seems like this council is just banning whatever the fuck they want without getting some opinions on high ladder players and people who understand the meta well, such as my friend Vertex or Storm Zone (which I would heavily advocate to be on the council, as they are in touch with the metagame and consistently high ladder players).

The same thing goes for Urshifu to be honest. The mon has a decent 322 max speed, which outspeeds most of the metagame however leaves it open to revenge kills easily and the Swords Dance set is very prone to momentum, which is VERY prevalent with the amount of volt-turns from zapdos and pivot moves in general. Garganacl, a Mon I STRONGLY believe needs a suspect is 100 times worse and it can turn into water and completely invalidate the physical mons of OU with its curse/ID BP set. Many mons are running tera water right now, and it’s not helping urshifu whatsoever. The best set imo is choice band urshifu water, since it gets very good straight up value with its very hard hitting band booster Surging Strikes, although it is now prone to flame body/static (which is much more op than dire “mid” claw - in which the council is still obsessing over despite the move being shit). Is Urshifu a good Mon? Absolutely. Its raw power debatably makes it a contender for a suspect test, but ABSOLUTELY not a straight up quick ban. We are devaluing the existence of quick bans, as CTC outlined; quick bans are for the absolutely undisputed overpowered ‘mons like Regieleki, Marshadow and Iron Bundle, NOT for 2 mons that the community is divided over.
most importantly, zamazenta-h is so much more oppressive than volc AND shifu in my opinion, as it’s high speed tier as well as it’s lefties sub set with ID let’s it even stall out variants of pex and clod, which is pretty absurd.

It’s time for a change. I do not wish to flame the council for their decisions, but the end line is that they are quickbanning mons that 90% of players would agree that a suspect is much more sensible. I believe strongly that a quickban is unreasonable UNLESS it is an absolutely broken Mon that is undisputedly broken by the high ladder players, and all other ELO ranges too.

I’ll say it again; I personally believe volc and shifu deserve suspects. My real question is why is zama-h not even banned yet even though people have expressed their disapproval of that Mon in OU from the beginning??
Action must be taken.

A88FCD3D-70B8-478A-9364-83C47671E4E6.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • B3119A28-E01C-4760-98EC-33B81E12BE8D.jpeg
    B3119A28-E01C-4760-98EC-33B81E12BE8D.jpeg
    81.6 KB · Views: 79
Last edited:
My original post was in jest but now I do have something serious to say. Volc's definitely worthy of tiering attention but quickbanning it right now is a horrible idea. It's been an OU staple all generation (and for thirteen years prior, mind you). I won't claim that removing it will definitely make the tier worse but I think that it was a rash decision at the very least- for one, Iron Valiant just lost half of its best checks in the span of three days.

Is it rash or is it decisive?

I wouldn’t call it a horrible idea, especially without knowing what the future holds for this meta, it’s a realistic scenario, where we don’t get to Tera test prior to dlc 1, even after banning volc.
 
As I've mentioned in my previous post, I voted the way I did with the full intention to advocate for suspecting the targeted Pokemon in the future. I believe Volcarona deserves a suspect test, and I believe Urshifu-R deserves one too; however I personally recognize that, in spite of that, there are clear influences on both play and the building process that these Pokemon pose on the tier that I personally feel we would be better off avoiding during WCoP due to its high-level status and being a format entrenched in opportunity for players of different backgrounds to make their mark. I believe a stable metagame is important for that, and unfortunately there are just way too many problems with the tier to where I personally saw this approach as a necessary evil. Again, I will be advocating for suspect tests on these Pokemon to be freed at an opportune time.

You all have the right to express your frustrations and concerns regarding the recent decision, and we do not want to try and censor that by locking the thread like last time. However, blatant insults are not and never will be tolerated. Anybody who tries to belittle or attack others for their stance on the matter or demonstrating any kind of hostility toward others will be infracted going forward.

For a more constructive approach, I would implore you all to check out Finchinator's recent policy review post regarding tiering responses we have started to do going into this generation and how we can improve them, as we are human and are still learning how to adapt to Pokemon's new release frameworks. If you are upset about the current state of affairs, I implore that you read the thread and leave your thoughts there as it is the place to do so. Thanks!
What are the odds of either of these two being suspected before zama-h? This seems more pressing.
 
Fairly new to the competitive scene for SV ((and these forums). Does anyone mind sharing what the current meta builds (EVs, moveset, etc.) are for the below mons? Struggling to find quick threads with this info.

1.) Iron Hands
2.) Heatran
3.) Iron Valiant
 
The question is which one volcarona was targetted at cause a lot of high elo players don't agree with the ban, and the demand via the survey was mostly from low elo players to be looked at.
Do you have a source for this? All Finch said was 50+ people wrote-in about Volcarona; I didn’t see any comments about elo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top