• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

Unpopular opinions

My mainline game tier list categories would probably be like
  • Can always start up a new run and trust that I'll have a good time
  • Good enough that I regularly forget its flaws, but flawed enough that I'm always a little disappointed when I come back to it
  • Won't replay unless I have a very specific challenge run idea that seems fun enough to paper over (or make use of!) the game's shortcomings
  • Never again (unless......)
 
View attachment 564961
We need this death battle matchup, it would be sick, give me your thoughts on it, and who you think wins. I believe it would be Koraidon, ynow, the one who can split continental crust with a punch
Is it specifically Razewing Rathalos/Ratha from Monster Hunter Stories 2, or just any Rathalos, not like I expect Death Battle to do good research anyway.
 
Is it specifically Razewing Rathalos/Ratha from Monster Hunter Stories 2, or just any Rathalos, not like I expect Death Battle to do good research anyway.
Razewing, and from what I know, I think Koraidon wins.
He can jump 65 feet into the air, is immensly powerful for his size according to his Pokedex entries and the Pokemon SV website, is very durable, and has insane stamina
 
I think these things are silly, but I feel obligated to mention that an average Rathalos is about 55 feet in length from head to tail. Stories has a chibi art style, so this might be hard to grasp comparing directly with it, but a Rathalos is typically several times Koraidon's size. Eternatus (65 feet long) is the only Pokemon of comparable size.
Razewing Ratha has no canon statistics, with fanon esimates between 18-74 feet in length. But size isnt everything, as power also matters, as well as speed and mobility.
Exhibit A;
ScarletThis seems to be the Winged King mentioned in an old expedition journal. It was said to have split the land with its bare fists.
I know the Pokedex exagerates, but this is a legendary Pokemon, this is feasable
Interpreting this as crack the continental crust, a strike as powerful as the one that wiped out the dinosaurs, the KT meteor, wasnt strong enough, so Koraidon is fucking rediculous if that is canon
Basically
Koraidons full power punch is greater than 8000 Fat Man's (the bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima)
Basically, in pure destructive power, Koraidon is not being beat by Razewing Rathalos
 
Last edited:
"Splitting the land" is nowhere near the same as splitting continental crust. JP wording also uses 大地, which is basically solid ground/earth. I.E. Koraidon can fissure surface level terrain with its fists. The entry doesn't support the idea of Koraidon busting continents at all.
Ok, that is fair, it is not clearly worded, I shouldnt have assumed that. I changed the article
 
"Splitting the land" is nowhere near the same as splitting continental crust. JP wording also uses 大地, which is basically solid ground/earth. I.E. Koraidon can fissure surface level terrain with its fists. The entry doesn't support the idea of Koraidon busting continents at all.
I expect DEATH BATTLE! to not just take Pokédex entries at face value, but also scale Koraidon to Arceus the gosh-darn Demiurge because the sandwich-eating dinosaur bike OHKOes Normal-type Almighty Sinnoh with Low Kick, which isn't even the prehistoric chopper's strongest move.
 
I expect DEATH BATTLE! to not just take Pokédex entries at face value, but also scale Koraidon to Arceus the gosh-darn Demiurge because the sandwich-eating dinosaur bike OHKOes Normal-type Almighty Sinnoh with Low Kick, which isn't even the prehistoric chopper's strongest move.
Yeah, they might depending on their bias, as Monster Hunter hasn’t been showcased on their channel as far as I am aware, but they might be heavily biased in Rathalos’s favor. Imo, this is a even matchup, with it being able to go either way, but if they say either side had a massive advantage, I’m calling their BS.
This has changed since my first post
 
Last edited:
Reiterating that I find the whole premise dumb, but I really want to emphasize the size difference here. Realistically, creatures can't take on something several times their size. Sure, in fantasy settings, especially RPGs where size is pretty much irrelevant (as is the case in Pokemon), this doesn't matter. But how realistic do you think your odds would be against someone the size of an elephant? The size difference here is at least that much.

This is a huge fantasy vs. realism contention kind of thing. Monster Hunter monsters tank a good hundred or so blows from wickedly sharp blades, powerful bludgeons, and lethal bullets, the likes of which have no purpose or reason to exist in Pokemon, and this is justified in-universe by the sheer durability of their scales and the like. On the other hand, Pokemon are capable of fantastic feats that make no sense because of its high fantasy nature, so even the frailest of Pokemon faced with blows that rupture the very ground it stands on will merely faint, and this is justified in-universe by...uh, that's just what Pokemon do, I guess?

From a grounded perspective, it's no contest at all. From a fantasy perspective, it's almost always going to favor the more absurd and unrealistic setting, as fantasy works can just make up their own guidelines. Consequently, I'm really not a fan of the premise of these types of ideas, trying to compare two settings with completely different rules is kind of dumb. I favor adaptations / collaborations, but even then, these two settings make for a really poor fit.
 
Reiterating that I find the whole premise dumb, but I really want to emphasize the size difference here. Realistically, creatures can't take on something several times their size. Sure, in fantasy settings, especially RPGs where size is pretty much irrelevant (as is the case in Pokemon), this doesn't matter. But how realistic do you think your odds would be against someone the size of an elephant? The size difference here is at least that much.

This is a huge fantasy vs. realism contention kind of thing. Monster Hunter monsters tank a good hundred or so blows from wickedly sharp blades, powerful bludgeons, and lethal bullets, the likes of which have no purpose or reason to exist in Pokemon, and this is justified in-universe by the sheer durability of their scales and the like. On the other hand, Pokemon are capable of fantastic feats that make no sense because of its high fantasy nature, so even the frailest of Pokemon faced with blows that rupture the very ground it stands on will merely faint, and this is justified in-universe by...uh, that's just what Pokemon do, I guess?

From a grounded perspective, it's no contest at all. From a fantasy perspective, it's almost always going to favor the more absurd and unrealistic setting, as fantasy works can just make up their own guidelines. Consequently, I'm really not a fan of the premise of these types of ideas, trying to compare two settings with completely different rules is kind of dumb. I favor adaptations / collaborations, but even then, these two settings make for a really poor fit.
CrystalEven a missile can’t break the spikes it uses to stab opponents. They’re even harder than its shell.
FireRedIts shell is extremely hard. It cannot be shattered, even with a bomb. The shell opens only when it is attacking.
this one is also used by Y and Sun, but these weapons theoretically exist, just we just havent seen them. I am aware of how wack older Pokedex entries are, but yeah. As well as several stating a harder than diamond shell. I am aware these could be exaggerated, but this is an Japanese RPG, it might be that wacky.
 
I guess I should have specified moreso MH's specific kind of anti-monster weaponry wielded by human hands against said monsters, in a way that humans in the Pokémon world never do. Though I might say, missiles are actually more advanced technology than that of the MH setting. The MH movie suggests modern military weapons like bullets and missiles don't faze MH monsters whatsoever, but the movie is terrible, I won't acknowledge it.
 
CrystalEven a missile can’t break the spikes it uses to stab opponents. They’re even harder than its shell.
FireRedIts shell is extremely hard. It cannot be shattered, even with a bomb. The shell opens only when it is attacking.
this one is also used by Y and Sun, but these weapons theoretically exist, just we just havent seen them. I am aware of how wack older Pokedex entries are, but yeah. As well as several stating a harder than diamond shell. I am aware these could be exaggerated, but this is an Japanese RPG, it might be that wacky.

We see bombs all the time in the anime (or at least we did in the original anime, I'm less familiar with modern stuff)
 
We see bombs all the time in the anime (or at least we did in the original anime, I'm less familiar with modern stuff)
The modern anime just has brain-washing (no I’m not kidding)
I think swsh is the best pokemon game
I believe people were just salty about Dexit, its not prefect, heck, I don’t think its great, but its at least decent. I also have a lot of good memories with it, raising my Inteleon, James Pond, to her full potential. And also dunking on Raihan
 
The modern anime just has brain-washing (no I’m not kidding)

I believe people were just salty about Dexit, its not prefect, heck, I don’t think its great, but its at least decent. I also have a lot of good memories with it, raising my Inteleon, James Pond, to her full potential. And also dunking on Raihan
To be perfectly honest, if Dexit wasn't a thing I'm pretty sure most people would consider SwSh one of the best ones.
 
I like SwSh, but I doubt this. A lot of peoples’ major points of criticism toward SwSh don’t have anything to do with Dexit, like the story conclusion, route / town design, and the amount of post-game content.
Yeah I don't care about Dexit at all, but SwSh are still the games that I have the least desire to go back to. SwSh has plenty of memorable characters, but for me, the only memorable battles are against Raihan (because of his bad-but-fun gimmick) and Leon (because of the big level jump) and in both of my Shield playthroughs I consistently felt like I had to deliberately play suboptimally if I wanted to have any fun.

EDIT: there's still stuff that I like about SwSh though, at least in theory (character customisation, expansive options for monotype runs, most of the new mons, etc.)
 
Last edited:
I like SwSh, but I doubt this. A lot of peoples’ major points of criticism toward SwSh don’t have anything to do with Dexit, like the story conclusion, route / town design, and the amount of post-game content.
The entire story from what I've seen is just. Bad? Not just the ending. Like I know Pokémon has never been super strong or focused on narrative, but SWSH feels like it actively hides most of the plot from you until you're randomly thrust into action due to incredibly contrived reasons.

Also Team Yell sucks and there are some really bizarre presentation snafus. I don't mean the N64 tree, I'm talking stuff like Piers's silent singing.
 
The entire story from what I've seen is just. Bad? Not just the ending. Like I know Pokémon has never been super strong or focused on narrative, but SWSH feels like it actively hides most of the plot from you until you're randomly thrust into action due to incredibly contrived reasons.

Depends on who you ask, I guess. Like, personally I agree with the common critique that everything after the Semifinals up to the battle against Eternatus feels rushed and contrived, but I think the majority of the story is on-par for a main series Pokémon game, which is to say, it’s fine. I think there’s some neat thematic work going on, and I like the characters. It’s nothing exceptional, but it’s serviceable for what it is. I didn’t feel like it “hid the plot” in any way that stuck out to me as unusual.

But then, I’m the guy whose favorite villain team in the series is Team Flare, so I’m not exactly with the grain.
 
SwSh also has performance issues that makes the Wild Area annoyingly laggy, also the Y-Comm is agreed to be even worse than the Festival Plaza, itself an unpopular replacement for the PSS.
And I'm pretty sure the games also has at least one game-breaking bug that was never fixed.
---
Here's my unpopular opinion of the day: :berry-pots:the Berry Pots are a really awesome Key Item that should have appeared in more games and have zero business being only in HGSS, and the removal of the mechanic of growing Berries is one of GF's dumbest decisions ever.
Oh yeah, and the ugly Wild Area tree you see in memes? I thought SwSh's ugliest trees were the Berry trees that house Greedent and Cherubi.:trode:

#MakeBerryFarmingConvenientAgain
 
Oh yeah, and the ugly Wild Area tree you see in memes? I thought SwSh's ugliest trees were the Berry trees that house Greedent and Cherubi.:trode:

#MakeBerryFarmingConvenientAgain
Fitting because Greedent is one of the ugliest Pokemon designs I have ever looked at. Like there are Pokemon that are more aesthetically unappealing (whether by design or unintentional), but this thing fills me with the most annoyance/revulsion to look at of the entire National Dex somehow.
 
Fitting because Greedent is one of the ugliest Pokemon designs I have ever looked at. Like there are Pokemon that are more aesthetically unappealing (whether by design or unintentional), but this thing fills me with the most annoyance/revulsion to look at of the entire National Dex somehow.
Does this look like the face of mercy to you?
giga squirrel.png


(Yes that was so cursed I took a image of it ages ago and keep it as reminder of how cursed it was)
 
Back
Top