i think both of you are in that group for your read proximity to other members of that group not necessarily p2pI’ve had no shared views with HyHy tho iirc
i think both of you are in that group for your read proximity to other members of that group not necessarily p2pI’ve had no shared views with HyHy tho iirc
Even if you disagree with the grouping the auto-distancing from the group could well be notable in its own right. Confirmation I was accidentally correct or whatever
Ok that makesTBF you were the most tenuous grouping IMO and I genuinely moved you between neutral and top group before settling on the chaos option
I remember feeling you shared reads with realiti, and Hydro has def shared reads with realiti, so triangulation and all
#646
I don’t understand since no one will explain itcan you elaborate a bit on why you dont think rostam's a good vote
do you not buy the jalmont breadcrumb thing
psyY'all who do I shoot with my very real not faked role
Limited access, will try to be online before dl.
Thinking we're missing something in the p46 votecount angleshooting wise
TBF I do feel Sam’s group came from his specific POV which I would tend to agree with, those are his strong townreads and he even admitted to sheeping realiti on the Hydro read. As noted later the groups have interplay between the members and none are exact 1-to-1s though; Sam and Zippy have little relation to one another but are one link in the chain apart.exceptions only prove the rule when it's the exception :P you now have 2 people in that group going "heck's this group, this group's rubbish"
tbf i posted that before i saw skip say fair enoughTBF I do feel Sam’s group came from his specific POV which I would tend to agree with, those are his strong townreads and he even admitted to sheeping realiti on the Hydro read. As noted later the groups have interplay between the members and none are exact 1-to-1s though; Sam and Zippy have little relation to one another but are one link in the chain apart.
And skipper said fair enough so W? Maybe?
I see your point though lol
Okay, unvote, vote Rostamjalmont's role is "i target you and what you were planning to do at night is done to me"
jalmont dies
we find a post by jalmont that's basically like "yall rostam is suspicious, ill look into it tomorrow"
people theorize that rostam, a low key solvey new player, would be a good pick by a scum team to give the night kill
people theorize that jalmont targeted rostam to see what would happen if anything
Okay, unvote, vote Rostam
And d1 at least two scum were on the wagons, probably 3 or all 4. Thinking we should look into buddying vs votes there.
It’s a good theory I don’t buy it rnjalmont's role is "i target you and what you were planning to do at night is done to me"
jalmont dies
we find a post by jalmont that's basically like "yall rostam is suspicious, ill look into it tomorrow"
people theorize that rostam, a low key solvey new player, would be a good pick by a scum team to give the night kill
people theorize that jalmont targeted rostam to see what would happen if anything
On the real if your claim is true and has some kind of mechanic of needing a town dead to proc then I am genuinely concerned that AG is an indie with a stockpiling extra vote weight mechanic based on x thing happening and so I still think he’s a good shot lol
It’s a good theory I don’t buy it rn