NOC 16P Role Madness Mafia (CANCELLED)

genisu as you catch up... please i think i speak for most of us here: we would much rather you take your time at deadline making sure all the votes are correct, as opposed to trying to go quickly and relying on our unofficial votecounts. i'd much rather you go through all pages since your last vote count and take an additional hour or two to count the votes than move quickly to get results out and potentially make a mistake

my recommendation: use the AG method! have a list of players, and move backwards in the thread. whenever you see a vote, mark it down, then ignore that player for the rest of your search. because the first vote you'll see starting from the end will always be the latest vote, you never have to worry about any previous voting behavior. mark down if someone unvoted as their last vote too, since the act of unvoting is the final voting behavior and people can end off of a vote at the end of a day.

i know you've expressed uncertainty about going through every single page and post, and that's understandable, but i'd recommend it genuinly - it's the only way to gain hosting experience managing votecounts, and the last thing anyone in this game wants is someone cutting corners for convenience and the wrong person gets flipped.

thank you for hosting as always!!
 
pulsar512b said:
it would be funny

maybe works better for one where a bot runs the voting system or smth on like discord or something (or something like MU's deal)
Click to expand...
this reminds me i made a mafia bot for some random mafia server and i cant host it myself so somoone volunteered. he still hasnt done it its been months. annoyed. also was asked for like a million changes. i hate that i have to maintain it. smh smh
 
a fairy said:
genisu as you catch up... please i think i speak for most of us here: we would much rather you take your time at deadline making sure all the votes are correct, as opposed to trying to go quickly and relying on our unofficial votecounts. i'd much rather you go through all pages since your last vote count and take an additional hour or two to count the votes than move quickly to get results out and potentially make a mistake

my recommendation: use the AG method! have a list of players, and move backwards in the thread. whenever you see a vote, mark it down, then ignore that player for the rest of your search. because the first vote you'll see starting from the end will always be the latest vote, you never have to worry about any previous voting behavior. mark down if someone unvoted as their last vote too, since the act of unvoting is the final voting behavior and people can end off of a vote at the end of a day.

i know you've expressed uncertainty about going through every single page and post, and that's understandable, but i'd recommend it genuinly - it's the only way to gain hosting experience managing votecounts, and the last thing anyone in this game wants is someone cutting corners for convenience and the wrong person gets flipped.

thank you for hosting as always!!
Click to expand...
Wait I didn’t know the AG method going backwards. That’s very clever lmao
 
Celever said:
Basically what pulsar said but also part of his draw in his past game was he was willing to go against the grain and this game he’s just followed thread opinion at the time
Click to expand...

Assume joey flips s. Who do you think has partner equity? Does anybody specifically not seem like a partner?
 
ss is mostly woefully absent of drama other than change taking forever. but eh the other poster in the subforum got badged and hail won a game in spl so
 
Celever said:
RBTT’s happening which is usually relatively drama-free, but we’ve had a lot of content out of Michael this year so there’s a bit. Not really drama though, since everyone’s on the same side lol
Click to expand...
rbtt is a deeply unserious name for a tournament it sounds like a frog going ribbit
 
a fairy said:
yeah but i will keep my opinions on the foolishness of the host team's decision to myself
Click to expand...
I actually think that, though it was made hastily, it wasn’t a crazy foolish decision or anything. Just got rushed into a bit. They sought outside council the first time everyone got mad which backed them up too
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top