NOC Pokemon Mystery Dungeon Mafia - Explorers - Game Thread (Game Over!)

no, i mean, i get that, i just didn't get any idea that jalmont "latched onto" anything, his top two scumreads are people that have been far and away under the radar for the majority of the game and he has seemed unconcerned with galvanizing people this phase, whenever you type about him it makes me think i'm taking crazy pills or something
His top two scumreads are contrived LHF bait if you were here last game. He's preying on your lack of knowledge shane.
 
no, i mean, i get that, i just didn't get any idea that jalmont "latched onto" anything, his top two scumreads are people that have been far and away under the radar for the majority of the game and he has seemed unconcerned with galvanizing people this phase, whenever you type about him it makes me think i'm taking crazy pills or something
I did say that the top para of his wallpost (Alice/saber) was the best part of his burst posting and then it dropped off from there. On reflection I'm not sure how valuable that best part is because he didn't push them with much conviction, and also "throw out two less active LHFy players as top scumreads" is a pretty safe bet to drum up a bit of towncred for novel content anyway. They're unlikely to gain much traction on account of being LHFy and even if one is your partner you can just hitch your wagon to the one whose town if a LHF purge burgeons. (if they're both your partner you prob don't post it though!)

everything else is where the commandeering takes place. It is a little frustrating you counterpointed me with the only paragraph I said doesn't apply.
 
Also bluedoom you we’re voting me when I wasn’t pushing all the people you wanted me to push IIRC so idk why you’re saying “you’re only doing it now I’m voting you” but ok


My case is literally: I think you are spending posts discrediting people who talk because you don't want a town core forming; I think if you were town this is valid paranoia and you make cases on these people earlier instead of voting laurel who had no thread presence(and still doesn't tbh) at the time of the vote, instead of waiting for me to pressure vote you and then you talk. Whatever you're doing right now is reactionary and defensive.
 
I did say that the top para of his wallpost (Alice/saber) was the best part of his burst posting and then it dropped off from there. On reflection I'm not sure how valuable that best part is because he didn't push them with much conviction, and also "throw out two less active LHFy players as top scumreads" is a pretty safe bet to drum up a bit of towncred for novel content anyway. They're unlikely to gain much traction on account of being LHFy and even if one is your partner you can just hitch your wagon to the one whose town if a LHF purge burgeons. (if they're both your partner you prob don't post it though!)

everything else is where the commandeering takes place. It is a little frustrating you counterpointed me with the only paragraph I said doesn't apply.
so for commandeering, ur talking about him cementing clouds and bluedoom as townreads or what?
 
Like how tf did you go from "Mafia are scared of shane, he's town and mafia cased him to lower his social position" to "M2H is right Shane-laurel have scum-scum equity" and decide that the strongest vote for you was actually laurel???
 
My case is literally: I think you are spending posts discrediting people who talk because you don't want a town core forming;
Do you think you / Clouds / JALMONT are the top posters of the day? I don't think so. You've all been fairly active though, yeah. But it's far more targeted and specific than that you're active and townread each other.
bluedoom said:
I think if you were town this is valid paranoia and you make cases on these people earlier instead of voting laurel who had no thread presence(and still doesn't tbh) at the time of the vote,
That isn't the only way to play the game. Sorry if you disagree with me trying to unstagnate the thread. Still aligns with my action of limiting a bad "towncore" forming because it broadens the conversation occurring away from just whatever the towncore wants to talk about. You don't have to hold a knife to someone's neck in order to try and work around them forming a bad towncore.
bluedoom said:
instead of waiting for me to pressure vote you and then you talk. Whatever you're doing right now is reactionary and defensive.
your pressure vote means nothing lol. It's just later in D1 than it was when I voted for Laurel.
 
so for commandeering, ur talking about him cementing clouds and bluedoom as townreads or what?
that in addition to parroting a lot of their other views. he was also active in the beat down of pulsar right before that burstpost in a way that is pretty uncharacteristic for him considering his cerebrality. if anything he led the charge there.
 
Like how tf did you go from "Mafia are scared of shane, he's town and mafia cased him to lower his social position" to "M2H is right Shane-laurel have scum-scum equity" and decide that the strongest vote for you was actually laurel???
I was voting Laurel before the S/S eq thing there that's not why I voted Laurel
 
I voted Laurel because it was the most viable wagon to push to 2 votes hopefully in order to get people talking more broadly and maybe for people to say "oh no, I don't want Laurel to be the second leading wagon, I better vote for someone too!" etc. etc. etc..

Not every vote means "I want this person to die rfn", especially halfway through D1.
 
I don't know how to respond to what you're saying because despite laurel being voted he has gone utr and we're still wondering wtf he's doing. I'm having a real hard time buying the claim that voting laurel makes the thread more dynamic
 
##vote jalmont

let's sit here for now, though im confused as to why it went from nothing to me being like vote 3 on it just by me going "id like to vote jalmont here"
it is slightly wild but the wagon IMO seems quite pure

that's one of the unstagnation grenades I threw in the thread that did work lol
 
I voted Laurel because it was the most viable wagon to push to 2 votes hopefully in order to get people talking more broadly and maybe for people to say "oh no, I don't want Laurel to be the second leading wagon, I better vote for someone too!" etc. etc. etc..

Not every vote means "I want this person to die rfn", especially halfway through D1.
Don't speak for everyone. When I vote it means I'VE GOT A BONER FOR MURDER!!!

(if nobody gets this reference I hate all of you)
 
I don't know how to respond to what you're saying because despite laurel being voted he has gone utr and we're still wondering wtf he's doing. I'm having a real hard time buying the claim that voting laurel makes the thread more dynamic
votes also don't solely pressure people. I really think you're treating the Laurel vote with a really low level of strategy.
 
Back
Top