NOC Pokemon Mystery Dungeon Mafia - Explorers - Game Thread (Game Over!)

you already asked me my thoughts on hydro, did you read?

I'd consider a fairy over genisu but honestly genisu has done little to try help town today, besides trying to claim town for having a role, I'd also consider Shane tbh
I did just read your thoughts on Hydro and they informed my reply.

You were actively kinda hesitant about genisu before in a “could well be town” way. I think that stacks up worse than your hesitancy around Hydro which is “if he’s town I’ll feel stupid” way.
 
because she is person playing a mafia game, as someone who is willing to vote her possibly, this is just natural thing everyone should do in the game

(even if mafia try hard it more oftentimes)

a fairy seems much more reticent to out that kind of stuff than I would tbf. But I am also an impulsive player as town most of the time.
 
I did just read your thoughts on Hydro and they informed my reply.

You were actively kinda hesitant about genisu before in a “could well be town” way. I think that stacks up worse than your hesitancy around Hydro which is “if he’s town I’ll feel stupid” way.

I have no one I'm confident on being mafia, most confident is laurel but he's been shielded by clouds

I think a lot of other people have been towny, but people who are nowt lackluster are genius/a fairy/Shane, just above that probably you and alice tbh, but I think vote will fall in first 3
 
a fairy seems much more reticent to out that kind of stuff than I would tbf. But I am also an impulsive player as town most of the time.

maybe true, you are right it's better to not out it, but much of the game has been and we are currently playing semi open claimed so idt it's damning
 
I have no one I'm confident on being mafia, most confident is laurel but he's been shielded by clouds

I think a lot of other people have been towny, but people who are nowt lackluster are genius/a fairy/Shane, just above that probably you and alice tbh, but I think vote will fall in first 3

im alright with a shane vote btw. I think he makes some degree of sense even in my tinfoil anthology. im good with any of those three really.
 
Your first scenario makes no sense if I am mafia then obviously I know what roles the mafia have - unless you just slipped and are confirming mafia have a teammate outside their chat. HMMMM

second scenario, instead of “could” please explain just 1 scenario where it would be an asset to claim second instead of first.

If you really believed I wasn’t a vigi then you would think I would outright claim I didn’t shoot and yet I haven’t and continue to not do that. Your argument boils down to “I think you are lying so you should be voted” which I don’t really think is a consistent position you have held which makes it disingenuous to me but feel free to disprove that I haven’t done the research. Again, you are so concerned about my supposed “lie” which is just a lie by omission at worst, when you are equally guilty because you haven’t claimed!!!!

See Joey’s post re: concluding thoughts. Again I have historically been one of the most anti-hero shooters on this site.
I don’t understand your first paragraph to the extent that I think the only explanation is you didn’t understand what I said

So that you’re not competing over the same potential vig target.

I actively don’t think you’re a vig, so I don’t think it’s just a lie by omission. Not claiming on D2 is so far from a lie that it isn’t even a lie by omission. Your attempt to make some kind of centre ground there is not effective.

I’m not really tryna get you killed for it though. This tone is a lot more defensive than it probably should be. I’m not townreading you but I’m also not exactly tunnelling you or even really tryna get you voted out today lol.

Shooting N1 is how you confirm your own placement in the town in this position. I still think you identify that and resultantly make that play, even if it goes against a principle or whatever
 
I don’t understand your first paragraph to the extent that I think the only explanation is you didn’t understand what I said

So that you’re not competing over the same potential vig target.

I actively don’t think you’re a vig, so I don’t think it’s just a lie by omission. Not claiming on D2 is so far from a lie that it isn’t even a lie by omission. Your attempt to make some kind of centre ground there is not effective.

I’m not really tryna get you killed for it though. This tone is a lot more defensive than it probably should be. I’m not townreading you but I’m also not exactly tunnelling you or even really tryna get you voted out today lol.

Shooting N1 is how you confirm your own placement in the town in this position. I still think you identify that and resultantly make that play, even if it goes against a principle or whatever

im inclined to sheep tommy on this one for now. he's by far the least likely tinfoil target in "debate club". jalmont's play is more annoying to me than particularly scummy. im also taking into consideration that I tend to be very free with information partly out of impulse but also out of wanting to have as much information to solve with. it does also seem to me that jalmont not claiming when he seems to also believe in massclaim and what not is strange. I previously pinned him as a potential parity cop and that explained his reticence to claim until d3, but with clouds claim i don't really have an explanation outside of him just trying to make a point out of spite. he definitely acts as if he has been treated unfairly d1, which maybe yeah after getting wagonned two d1's in a row yea, but also i think his playstyle baits that kind of reaction if im being honest.
 
Back
Top