I see. However, I can see why he does some of these things. In theory, Evire and nape look great, while in practice they are ehh. I think that our pal has gotten into the theorymoning thinking. He looks mainly at the positive attributes of bad pokemon, and the negative aspects of some good pokemon. He also most likely uses the meh pokemon exceptionally well which is why he thinks they are great. He thought that kyurem-c sucked, but after a repla I showed him, he thought that kyurem-c was rather good. We basically need live evidence to prove bad pokemon are bad, and good pokemon are good.
Sorry for being a bit confusing.