if i was a sturm-liouville problem, i wouldnt need infinitely many fundamental solutions. just you is enough for me.
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
-
if i wrote the laws of analysis, my winding number around you would be infinite
and the limit inferior of ugliness
you are the limit superior of cuteness
f(x) walks into a bar. the barman says "sorry, we don't do functions"
No, not at all. Also, tab scares me.
kinneas
i'd prove the continuum hypothesis for you. in two different set theories.
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory may be the standard, but i'm willing to take you as my axioms instead
i'm a logical consequence of you
while i like being a free variable, i'm willing to become a bound variable for you
if you're a predicate, then i'm your variable
let's take our conjunction
i'll be any quantifier you want for you
with you, it's a two way implication
my love for you is a tautology
i'd love to take your lebesgue measure
and for you, i'd make the jump over to non-standard analysis
they say infinitesimals dont exist, but with my kinneas, anything is possible
if i was integrated for every time you've made me swoon, i'd have been integrated over an infinite dimensional space by now
with you, i've got no need to make a change of variable
i'd love to take your curl
if the seriousness of our relationship was an integral, we'd have to give the interval it's over, as it's definate
and i'm more than happy to be your tangent
you're integral to me -
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…