My warriors winning game 1 today
Im a Jazz fan, still to early to call it but chuck said “this is the first time since November cavs didn’t make 10 3s in a game”.All the lower seeds won lol, is this March madness or something
The Cavs have been the latest team who's soul has been claimed by Halibron James, I was rooting for them to, big sad
I can see this perspective, but here's the thing: Do the Lakers need to be serious ring contenders to rake in cash for themselves and the league by extension? All signs point to no. They're a legacy franchise with a bunch of super iconic branding in popular culture, and they're situated in one of the country's biggest media markets. There's a meme that Lakers fans are also Yankee and Cowboy fans, and that's because they're all the same kind of franchise. If Jerry Jones can make the Cowboys the most valuable sports franchise on the planet without making the NFCCG this century, and the Yankees can be top two in MLB's pecking order despite not winning a World Series in decades, then the Lakers can rake in cash despite not being serious contenders for a while outside of the MMBR (Mickey Mouse Bubble Ring). All you have to do is get star players and keep the team in the news, and the Luka trade does both. What's good for the Lakers is good for the entire league because every team feels the revenue increase when a legacy franchise is keeping people engaged and buying merch. Speaking of which...I'm instinctively a big sports conspiracy doubter, so I'm treating my opposing gut reaction as more of a "devil's advocate" position than a genuine fully formed belief that I'm committed to. Especially because how ridiculous this looks on paper. But here is my initial reaction anyway. I'm curious if anyone agrees or not, if nothing else.
The Lakers are a merely decent franchise right now. Besides the bubble* title* that people kinda don't care about, they have a total of two playoff series wins in the past 12 years. This isn't a track record that suggests substantial past rigging to me, especially the heavy handed kind, especially when their best performance was when the fewest people cared. For the present, I don't doubt the Lakers could pull some star in F.A. to replace Lebron and maintain this "decent" level of performance and relevance. Rigging Doncic out as a way to "preserve the franchise post-Lebron" feels unnecessary and convoluted.
I don't like it either, but what can you do? The players will never agree to a salary cap, and the owners will never agree to a salary floor. The small-market owners have no incentive to rock the boat because revenue sharing makes it all even out at the end of the day. Same with every other sports league where one team is allowed to piledrive everyone year after year.Also holy FUCK the Dodgers bribing their way to victory is SO boring. God. I understand why people who have particular attachments to them like them, and I wish them no ill spirit, but god.
I think is all true but it comes down to me like, what does the Luka trade accomplish here that the FA carousel and signing a star there doesn't? Why make this flashy zany move when there's a natural alternative that doesn't require interference?I can see this perspective, but here's the thing: Do the Lakers need to be serious ring contenders to rake in cash for themselves and the league by extension? All signs point to no. They're a legacy franchise with a bunch of super iconic branding in popular culture, and they're situated in one of the country's biggest media markets. There's a meme that Lakers fans are also Yankee and Cowboy fans, and that's because they're all the same kind of franchise. If Jerry Jones can make the Cowboys the most valuable sports franchise on the planet without making the NFCCG this century, and the Yankees can be top two in MLB's pecking order despite not winning a World Series in decades, then the Lakers can rake in cash despite not being serious contenders for a while outside of the MMBR (Mickey Mouse Bubble Ring). All you have to do is get star players and keep the team in the news, and the Luka trade does both. What's good for the Lakers is good for the entire league because every team feels the revenue increase when a legacy franchise is keeping people engaged and buying merch.
Well, being flashy and zany is the point. I'm not sure that it'll work how the NBA hopes it will, what with how many people have been disillusioned as a result of how suspect it all is, but the point is that we're still talking about the Lakers/Mavs and where this trade leaves them months after the fact.I think is all true but it comes down to me like, what does the Luka trade accomplish here that the FA carousel and signing a star there doesn't? Why make this flashy zany move when there's a natural alternative that doesn't require interference?
i'm in the same boat lmao i have zero faith in him no one sane trades a guy like luka he's wacky enough to screw this up tooI'm a mavs fan but that was rigged, I have a bad feeling nico won't draft flagg though..
Hello again, everyone. My apologies for the double post. I was honestly expecting someone to beat me to the punch on what I’m about to say, but I guess I get first dibs. That being said, you know who’s not getting first dibs to the Western Conference finals this year? The freaking Warriors.I’ll save the second thing I wanted to post for later
I listened to the Zach Lowe pod, and he said the only gm against flattening the lottery odds was Sam Presti. The reasoning for him was that high draft picks was the only way for small market teams to get superstars. I had never thought about it that way. It sucks that Utah went from 1 to 5. At least you guys still have Jordan Clarkson lol.As a Jazz fan I hate being a Jazz fan