Resource RBY Simple Questions & Simple Answers Thread

The changes are recent and take time to update. If you're overtly going out of your way to complain, why don't you contribute to our development instead?
1. I know that. If I didn't, I would write this much earlier. But most of these revelations came months ago and important people already had opinions on them. The unbanning of the UUBL trio came months ago, so did the tier shifts of Victree and Slowbro. The Wrap one is excusable, but not the other ones.
2. I'm not a RBY conniseur, not even an OU one. I know these mistakes from browsing the dex when I'm bored. I barely have any opinions let alone analyses on these shifts. The responsibility is on you people, the moderators. I appreciate that you want people that like these tiers to possibly enlighten themselves on things they didn't know by writing analyses and possibly be future mods but for this tier, I'm not the person you guys want.
 
The UUBL Pokes still don't have a UU analysis
https://www.smogon.com/dex/rb/pokemon/articuno/
https://www.smogon.com/dex/rb/pokemon/hypno/
https://www.smogon.com/dex/rb/pokemon/lapras/

The UU page doesn't say that Wrap is banned, not even in the analysis of the pokes
https://www.smogon.com/dex/rb/formats/uu/
I'm in the UU council. The Slowbro and Victreebel drops into RBY happened exactly a month ago and not a single official tournament game has been played with either of them yet in this new version of the tier. Any new analyses about them would be mostly speculation. Regarding the UUBL drops , the other UU mons dont have updated analyses either, due to the frequency of tiering changes such as the recent Wrap ban, there would be no point in writing analyses and having them go through QC and GP only for them to be out of date a few months later. Preferably the tier should remain in a consistent state for longer than a few months before writing lenghty analyses.
 
I'm in the UU council. The Slowbro and Victreebel drops into RBY happened exactly a month ago and not a single official tournament game has been played with either of them yet in this new version of the tier. Any new analyses about them would be mostly speculation. Regarding the UUBL drops , the other UU mons dont have updated analyses either, due to the frequency of tiering changes such as the recent Wrap ban, there would be no point in writing analyses and having them go through QC and GP only for them to be out of date a few months later. Preferably the tier should remain in a consistent state for longer than a few months before writing lenghty analyses.
Thanks for clarifying that analyses about tiering changes like these take more than a month. I am aware that I might have overreacted and I understand the delay.
 
1753553480511.png
 
can we literally just reset uu ladder like the meta has changed like 7 times and the same few people at high elo achieved this in literally like 2021 or even earlier
its literally just not even the same tier so its not ridiculous to want this "special treatment" for this spotlight

You’re complaining to the wrong people, this is a PS thing that nobody can really make them change
 
I read a post saying that players with greater than 100 rating deviation are hidden from the ladder ranking, and if that's true then this is just a bug
 
Back
Top