So, did all the players in SPL released their viability rankings on Discord?Summary of this year's VR, short of making a long post due to time constraints on my end:
Thanks 16bit for gathering the data.
S1:
S2:
A1:
A2:
A3:
B1:
B2:
C1:
C2:
D:
E:
View attachment 742264
View attachment 742266
what's your logic behind rating magnezone 3 tiers higher than magneton? I know you are a very skilled player so I am curious on your reasoning, as to me the extra speed on magneton shouldn't be significantly worse than the higher BST magnezone has in other areas
My guess is the better stats in other categories make a differencewhat's your logic behind rating magnezone 3 tiers higher than magneton? I know you are a very skilled player so I am curious on your reasoning, as to me the extra speed on magneton shouldn't be significantly worse than the higher BST magnezone has in other areas
for me it really comes down to the power differential. i was never huge on magneton and i consider magnezone better than it most of the time, even though magneton boasts better speed w/ scarf. the first thing for me is that magnezone really never fails to kill skarm in 1 shot (unless you face sdef skarm which really isn't all that common atm, and if you're running non-scarf zone then modest tbolt is even better here) and can always prevent that second spike from going up. for some teams that choose to have zone alone as their "hazard control," this can be crucial. this extra power also enables it to catch heatran, scizor, lucario, gengar, jirachi, metagross, and others from slightly higher percentages. magnezone's decently higher bulk also enables it to more easily swap into a draco, or +2 espeed, or hp fire, or a scarf sciz superpower. sometimes that can make all the difference when magnezone already suffered a hit from coming in once prior, and it turns out you still need it for whatever reason. these are the stats differences which make it better than magneton for me.what's your logic behind rating magnezone 3 tiers higher than magneton? I know you are a very skilled player so I am curious on your reasoning, as to me the extra speed on magneton shouldn't be significantly worse than the higher BST magnezone has in other areas
On the Breloom take, the reason Breloom is ranked high in DPP is bc you need at least 2 Pokemon on your team that could reasonably take on the Loom. Breloom can easily halt momentum on offensive teams since Sleep is annoying. (On ladder, whenever I see a Loom is it SubPunch 80% of the time.)I’ve been lurking around this thread for a little while now and I have some questions about some of these rankings.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Breloom is a solid Pokémon, but Top 5? Really? Does Poison Heal and also Spore carry this thing that hard? I see the vision- it’s something with a good Clefable matchup, it’s a great sleep spreader, and it tends to hit pretty hard. But I don’t know, man, maybe it’s my inexperience with Gen 4 tiers specifically but I don’t think it plays like a Top 5 Pokémon in practice. Too often when I’ve tried to run it on my teams its average stats (save for that base 130 Attack) let me down. Breloom can synergize well with a lot of other top tier Pokémon in this format and subsequently wins a lot of key matchups, but I also find that, at least on ladder, it can be pretty easy to take advantage of and exploit. I’m not 100 percent sold on that typing yet defensively and overall imagine this might be one of those placements that’s justified because of Breloom’s ability to succeed in tournament play. Which, yeah, that’s fair, I suppose.
You’ve got to be kidding me. The Platinum GOAT himself is all the way down at 24th place like he’s stuck in a Mario Kart World lobby. This… hurts. Unfortunately for my soul, I do actually think this placement is justified. I just… Scizor’s reign of terror back in 2009 was quite some time before I joined the Pokémon fandom, but I remember playing with it for the first time when I did finally have access to Pokémon Showdown in this format and thinking this thing was genuinely unstoppable at times, warping the meta around itself and being one of the strongest reasons for Heatran’s rise in usage especially late into Gen 4’s heyday. Nowadays, though, one of my favorite Pokémon to use in this entire generation feels somewhat one-dimensional and not quite the easiest to fit on specific team structures. This generation having as many stacked Steel-Types as it does really doesn’t do Scizor any favors either in terms of competition. Oh, how the mighty have fallen. It’s okay, Scizor, I still love you.
Boy, was I wrong about this Pokémon. I was under the impression that Gyarados’s iconic Dragon Dance + Earthquake strategy was going to take a big hit relative to its Gen 3 OU iteration, seeing as physical Hidden Power Flying is gone and Stealth Rock is a thing here. That, and the offensive power creep of this generation was strong enough to where I didn’t think more specialized defensive Gyarados variants could work either. Physical Water STAB and the fact that… it’s Gyarados were always going to be enough to keep thing from falling to UU or anything like that, but Top 10? Gotta admit, I’m impressed, specifically by the more experienced playerbase that can make rankings like these happen. Again, Gen 4 is definitely not one of the ones I’m the most experienced with, but Gyarados’s combination of offensive threat and utility definitely caught me off guard even though I know me being this surprised over this placement probably looks extremely cringe to the people unfortunate enough to read my posts. (I am so sorry you have to deal with my crap.)
(Rotom-A, of course)
I’ve looked at three physical attackers, so why not end this off with a special attacker? You know what I find funny? If Gen 4 had Gen 6 paralysis mechanics where Electric-Types couldn’t be paralyzed (Rotom is immune to Body Slam at least so that’s something), that alone might raise this Pokémon up an entire sub-tier. I can’t decide if I think this placement is valid or if I think it’s actually a tad bit low. I’ve been of the belief for a few years now that Rotom-A is the best Electric-Type and the best Ghost-Type in this format, and while it definitely has some competition for the Electric-Type crown with stuff like Zapdos and… nope, I was right, it’s just Zapdos I think this competes with for that spot. I really like Rotom’s unique playstyle compared to something like Gengar too- its better defensive profile, while unfortunately lacking a reliable recovery move, is much better set up for Spinblocking and the occasional Explosion bait, and it can get a lot of use in specific team roles like a Speed Control or a status spreader. Losing out on a pivoting move (no Volt Switch here, but Zapdos still gets U-Turn) hurts it a lot here compared to later generations, as does the recovery issue, but I don’t know, I’ve used this thing a lot and it can still make decent enough progress. Question is, how much progress does this Pokémon across all the forms tend to make in bracket compared to on the ladder? Whether or not Rotom’s been doing good in tournaments lately is a mystery to me at this point in time, which kind of sucks because I’ve been trying to incorporate tournament results more into my opinions starting this ongoing year. For context, I used to judge Pokémon almost solely off of ladder stats and matchup spreads.
I usually find offensive Skarm better (The Spikes/SR/Taunt/Icy Wind) with Sash, defensive Skarm works better on stall.Just wanted to mention that Roserade tends to be underrated. I find it to be a better Spiker than Skarmory in many ways (more speed, not trappable, can threaten all the common spinners super-effectively). Also it can set up Spikes against completely different mons than Skarmory due to typing (such as waters and electrics).
People tend to rank it pretty low naturally, however I recommend using it.
Yes. Its good. Heals in sand. Unique typing. Priority move. Can be offensive or defensive. Spore can shutdown a counter like Skarm.Don’t get me wrong, I think Breloom is a solid Pokémon, but Top 5? Really?
Im not sure if it deserves to be so high. I run bulky offense teams mostly and Hippo/Clef stall is a stiff match for me. The clefs I remember facing recently I usually got the better of with Nasty Plot Togekiss. A +2 Air Slash flinch into Aura Sphere is GG for Clef. Also Rhyperior does pretty well with immunity to TWave, it comes in and can set up a sub or throw a Banded Quake/Edge edge. There are definitely good ways to punish Clefs passivity.Having a look at the VR for the first time, I'm curious why Clefable is A1 when although it's good, can struggle against a lot of the offensive physical mons in the tier and potentially loses the 1v1 against Taunt Gengar, etc.
I recall seeing a lot of Suicune structures in tours. I personally have soured on Suicune. I think it is almost obligated to run 3 attacks or it risks having a poor matchup. If you run Rest Talk / CM, i.e., you are going to lose to Breloom. And having 1 good set makes it predictable. I feel like Suicune barely beats my 172 HP / 252+ SpAtk / 84 SpDef Leftovers Empoleon set. It pretty much has to cast HP:Elec after one CM / Grass Knot turn. I think Suicune is ok on those Heatran / Metagross(?) structures but is too predictable to be much higher rated.I was also surprised with Suicune ranking so low, I feel it can fit on a lot of teams and once CM is set up can usually grab a few kills on different types of structures
Ya, I think Rotom deserves A1. Rotom/Clef tagteam stall is really good. I think this thing is more flexible than Gengar in every way.I would also potentially addslightly higher as it's a huge part of the metagame
Besides the immunity to sand, hazards, and being able to act as an incredible defensive sponge for either side, Clef w Knock Off + coverage(Twave/Encore) makes it incredibly difficult to switch in, easily compared to likes as trying to switch in Breloom, Jirachi, and Zapdos(kind of). Question yourself, besides Breloom and Clefable, who likes losing their item and then getting paralyzed? Clef will most likely retreat as most of her checks and counters tend to be properly responded from her partners. Her wincon is just too effective to the point that most offensive teams are built in a way to not let Clefable get an opportunity to get a turn if not using the clear counters or long-term checks. And those teams that neglect Clefable are unviable or fishy at best. And I haven't even gone to her other sets, such as CM, Cosmic, and Wish/Protect sets that are deadly wincon themself.
Having a look at the VR for the first time, I'm curious why Clefable is A1 when although it's good, can struggle against a lot of the offensive physical mons in the tier and potentially loses the 1v1 against Taunt Gengar, etc.
I would personally position this in the B1/B2 rank and happy to eloborate if needed.
Togekiss in A- is surprising, but yea the offensive sets are better since Normal/Flying is bad defensively. A Pokemon that works better on teams built on trading. (Similar to ADV Snorlax, flawed, but can trade hits & make some teams cry)My updated hot take tierlist as the resident enjoyer of alt-mons and s***-mons.
View attachment 766908
S tier: self explanatory.
A+ tier: I think this encapsulates the strong mons usually seen accompanying the big 3. Im a little skeptical of Heatran because I havent had much personal success using it. But I cant deny that it IS frustrating to play against especially when it explodes your Clefable.
A tier: I dont put Gyara higher mainly because of Rock weakness and honestly I wall it with Slowbro which is not a great look for Gyara. It answers things like Infernape, but Latias does it without weakness to rock. I probably rate Bronzong higher than most people, but I really love that Trick Room set. Trick Room -> Boom -> Band Rhyperior is my gimmick. I promise its good. Bronzong isnt only the undisputed king of TR, it also plays well as a lead and on Protect/Stall teams. I also think Metagross is slightly overrated by a lot of people. It gets walled by Skarm/Zong and usually loses to Heatran(?). I think its probably best in the lead position. Its always funny to me when people take a turn to setup agility when their Gross is already faster than my whole team.
A- tier: Ya Scizor is good. CB is good. Ive lost to SD Scizor a lot when its the last mon and Skarm can no longer phase it. Scary. Rest of the mons here I think are all quite good in their own right. Azelf in the back with Nasty Plot is a terrifying sweeper and Im glad people don't run it very often. I think people are in general warming up to Togekiss being a flinch machine. I run 0-speed Nasty Plot with 3-attacks which is actually fire and regularly goes 2 for 1. I think Empoleon is slightly underrated. Excellent defensive typing. It requires some specific partners to cover its weaknesses. Tour players have used the Sub/Agi sweep to good effect. I think bulky is also a pretty good Empoleon set. One of the best Latias walls. Zapdos is perennial.
B+ tier: For me this is the above-average tier, but things which are otherwise flawed. I may be doing D-nite a disservice with this rating, but the weakness to Rocks and getting 1-shot by anything ice and having a base 80 speed is kind of cringe. But it can pull off some sweeps with a +1 DD if you let it. Celebi is interesting defensively but still mostly outclassed by Latias. Gets rocks I guess. Infernape is the poster boy for Timmy's big HO team. Good but can get worn down by good defensive switches. Gliscor is a huge pain form me and I kind of hate it. The taunt set ruins my Rotom/Skarm tag team. Otherwise, Glisc doesnt do much though. Rhyperior is I think gaining some recognition recently. I build it bulky and I survive non-STAB water/grass moves in sand and I OHKO Latias's with CB Crunch. Access to Rock Polish / Swords Dance and crazy good coverage options.
B tier: Ive never been a fan of Gengar because its paper thin. It doesnt even outspeed Scarf-tar (right?). I think Rotom is just better, but Gengar can be good. Lucario so low is probably an unpopular opinion. I have seen Lucario's sweep but its another paper-thin pokemon which I think fits awkwardly on most teams. Swampert feels like an ADV carry over to me that people over value. Its decent, I dont think its awful. But its kind of passive and it gets clapped by the surprise HP:Grass which you always have to assume they have. Whenever I see a Swampert I think "Good, my opponent will let Slowbro Grass Knot this for FREE!", and they always do let me do it.
B- tier: Some amount of chaff here. Mons with good stats but other problems that prevent them from being better. I do think all of these can fit on a team that is built around them though.
C+ tier: I know common wisdom is that Slowbro is useless now that Machamp is gone. However, Slowbro is the 2nd best Trick Room setter in the tier after king Zong, so I can't give it the lowest rating. Also Slowbro gets Grass Knot, Flamethrower, Focus Blast. So if you want to get creative, it can absolutely be a coverage menace.
C tier: Aerodactyl is a joke and some day people will realize that it should never be ran. Miss me with the comments about your Aero/Gyara/Dragonite/Ape HO teams. ITS BAD. Weavile was correctly moved to (OU) recently. Hopefully Aero will join it sooner than later. (Or not, I enjoy the free wins against Aero players).