To preface this, I’d like to state that this is simply criticism of how things are being run right now. You know me, I’m not trying to demean or offend anyone, just simply state how I feel. Also, please feel free to correct me if anything I've said is inaccurate.
In light of Nalei’s recent resignation, the 1v1 Council has 4 members: Rosa, Alakazam, dogknees, and Waylaid. While others may like to argue their engagement with the current SS metagame, I feel that 4 members is way too low for a metagame of 1v1’s status. I also want to mention that the activity of such council members with regards to actively discussing the metagame was questionable, even before recent events. While I do not have access to channels such as #council, I have heard many accounts from prior and current members of the 1v1 council that activity has essentially dissipated since the Victini Suspect. Also, as of my writing this, there has not been a single message in #council-minutes since 12/12/2020 - almost an entire two months. While I do understand that the metagame isn’t necessarily in a state in which council action is necessitated, if my knowledge of tiering policy is correct, members of councils are expected to uphold consistent discussion on the metagame.
What I’d like to propose to add more council members. Most current members have other significant responsibilities: Rosa and TDA are both TLs, Forum Moderators, Tournament directors, VR Council members, Room Staff, and maintainers of various threads. dogknees is a Room Owner and 1v1 C&C head. Considering the number of commitments most of them have, I think it would be beneficial for everyone if there were more council members to take off the load that they all have.
Currently, tiering councils of official metagames hold anywhere from 8-13 members. I don’t see why we cannot follow this precedent. We certainly have enough knowledgeable people in the community to do it. We can take an approach similar to how OU handled its QC situation, in which they sent out a form in efforts to find knowledgeable people interested.
I’d like to emphasize the importance of having an active council, especially during tournaments such as PL, WC, and LT. Discussion of tours can help with overall metagame development. Large tours, especially team tours with many players working together, lead to many meta shifts in innovations which can be difficult to keep up with for many. There have also been situations with Pokemon such as Mimikyu, Cinderace, Togekiss, and Jirachi that were allowed in the metagame for way too long after some degree of agreement was reached that they were problematic because of a disconnect from the community and the council.
Well, that's all from me. As always, thank you for reading, and have a nice day.
In light of Nalei’s recent resignation, the 1v1 Council has 4 members: Rosa, Alakazam, dogknees, and Waylaid. While others may like to argue their engagement with the current SS metagame, I feel that 4 members is way too low for a metagame of 1v1’s status. I also want to mention that the activity of such council members with regards to actively discussing the metagame was questionable, even before recent events. While I do not have access to channels such as #council, I have heard many accounts from prior and current members of the 1v1 council that activity has essentially dissipated since the Victini Suspect. Also, as of my writing this, there has not been a single message in #council-minutes since 12/12/2020 - almost an entire two months. While I do understand that the metagame isn’t necessarily in a state in which council action is necessitated, if my knowledge of tiering policy is correct, members of councils are expected to uphold consistent discussion on the metagame.
What I’d like to propose to add more council members. Most current members have other significant responsibilities: Rosa and TDA are both TLs, Forum Moderators, Tournament directors, VR Council members, Room Staff, and maintainers of various threads. dogknees is a Room Owner and 1v1 C&C head. Considering the number of commitments most of them have, I think it would be beneficial for everyone if there were more council members to take off the load that they all have.
Currently, tiering councils of official metagames hold anywhere from 8-13 members. I don’t see why we cannot follow this precedent. We certainly have enough knowledgeable people in the community to do it. We can take an approach similar to how OU handled its QC situation, in which they sent out a form in efforts to find knowledgeable people interested.
I’d like to emphasize the importance of having an active council, especially during tournaments such as PL, WC, and LT. Discussion of tours can help with overall metagame development. Large tours, especially team tours with many players working together, lead to many meta shifts in innovations which can be difficult to keep up with for many. There have also been situations with Pokemon such as Mimikyu, Cinderace, Togekiss, and Jirachi that were allowed in the metagame for way too long after some degree of agreement was reached that they were problematic because of a disconnect from the community and the council.
Well, that's all from me. As always, thank you for reading, and have a nice day.
Last edited: