http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-dp/attract.shtml
Attract -- Support attack.
15 PP. 100% accuracy.
Makes opponent less likely to attack.
Pokemon who can learn it:
Just about every pokemon with a gender can learn this attack. TM45, Attract, is avaliable at the battle tower for 32 BP and at FR/LG Celedon City Department store for some cheap price.
===========
Attract seems to have been discarded into the "Never Used" moveset catagory. And Any battler worth his salt can see why attract is unpopular. Attract is unreliable: it only works on the average 50% of the time, not counting the many pokemon who are immune to it (Most of the Ubers, Porygon, etc. etc.). Furthermore, with very few exceptions, trainers cannot predict nor control the gender of the opponent's pokemon. So there will be entire battles where attract can never be used! But I think attract is unique enough that it deserves at least a discussion.
1. Most uber pokemon are immune to it, with exception of Latios/Latias. Okay, so thats a bad thing about attract. However, most people play OU around here, so that should make attract more ... attractive. :-p </bad pun>
2. Nearly every pokemon can learn it. It appears that every pokemon with a gender can actually learn attract... along with one genderless pokemon named Mew. Again, look at the list here: http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-dp/attract.shtml
3. Attract has 100% accuracy. According to a post in this thread: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23404 Attract even goes through substitutes.
4. If I remember correctly, Attract prevents 50% of the opponent's attacks from hitting. I just spent 30 minutes searching google and other sources but no one seems to care about this attack... no information is on it :-/ Correct me if I'm wrong however. And if you do find a reliable source, please post it up :-p Yes, I did check the analysis sub-forum and even over there Obi didn't know attract's specifics. He does however list 50% as attracts rate, so I'll assume that.
http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21870
5. Totally not used. We can almost always expect the opponent to not be ready for attract. Meaning they are either going to switch out or stick it through with piss-poor effects.
----------
With that said, there should be at least some sense why Attract is never used: Pokemon who are classified as "annoyers" have better things to do. Attract in a competitive environment will serve two purposes:
* Force the opponent to switch -- Useful, especially when coupled with spikes and friends. I'm not talking about whirlwind/roar here. I'm talking that the opponent is forced to waste a turn switching pokemon out. Generally attacks that are better than attract in this situation are Yawn and Toxic.
* Give protection to your own pokemon -- Obvious. If the opponent cannot attack, you have protected your own pokemon. Confuse Ray, Thunder-Wave, and flinch-hax seems the more popular route for these sort of things.
So basically, if attract ever is used successfully, the opponent is trapped between a rock and a hard place. Furthermore, it sets up a good environment for you to set something up. Anything from Dragon Dance to Belly Drum may be waiting here.
I admit. This begs the question: Why not just use Yawn, Confuse Ray, and so forth? Why even consider attract at all? They hit almost all pokemon equally (Ignore own tempo and insomnia pokemon for now...) and already get the job done.
One answer stands out above all, there are very few pokemon who can learn Yawn and/or Confuse Ray. If you can, most likely it would be a much better choice to just use the standard attacks.
So what potential is there? Well, the #1 potential I see is a Female-Wall counter. Both Blissey and Cresselia are 100% female, meaning any male special sweeper can effectively demolish their walling capabilities. If you're attracted, you cannot softboil or moonlight 50% of the time.
Okay, well, discuss :-p
Attract -- Support attack.
15 PP. 100% accuracy.
Makes opponent less likely to attack.
Pokemon who can learn it:
Just about every pokemon with a gender can learn this attack. TM45, Attract, is avaliable at the battle tower for 32 BP and at FR/LG Celedon City Department store for some cheap price.
===========
Attract seems to have been discarded into the "Never Used" moveset catagory. And Any battler worth his salt can see why attract is unpopular. Attract is unreliable: it only works on the average 50% of the time, not counting the many pokemon who are immune to it (Most of the Ubers, Porygon, etc. etc.). Furthermore, with very few exceptions, trainers cannot predict nor control the gender of the opponent's pokemon. So there will be entire battles where attract can never be used! But I think attract is unique enough that it deserves at least a discussion.
1. Most uber pokemon are immune to it, with exception of Latios/Latias. Okay, so thats a bad thing about attract. However, most people play OU around here, so that should make attract more ... attractive. :-p </bad pun>
2. Nearly every pokemon can learn it. It appears that every pokemon with a gender can actually learn attract... along with one genderless pokemon named Mew. Again, look at the list here: http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-dp/attract.shtml
3. Attract has 100% accuracy. According to a post in this thread: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23404 Attract even goes through substitutes.
4. If I remember correctly, Attract prevents 50% of the opponent's attacks from hitting. I just spent 30 minutes searching google and other sources but no one seems to care about this attack... no information is on it :-/ Correct me if I'm wrong however. And if you do find a reliable source, please post it up :-p Yes, I did check the analysis sub-forum and even over there Obi didn't know attract's specifics. He does however list 50% as attracts rate, so I'll assume that.
http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21870
5. Totally not used. We can almost always expect the opponent to not be ready for attract. Meaning they are either going to switch out or stick it through with piss-poor effects.
----------
With that said, there should be at least some sense why Attract is never used: Pokemon who are classified as "annoyers" have better things to do. Attract in a competitive environment will serve two purposes:
* Force the opponent to switch -- Useful, especially when coupled with spikes and friends. I'm not talking about whirlwind/roar here. I'm talking that the opponent is forced to waste a turn switching pokemon out. Generally attacks that are better than attract in this situation are Yawn and Toxic.
* Give protection to your own pokemon -- Obvious. If the opponent cannot attack, you have protected your own pokemon. Confuse Ray, Thunder-Wave, and flinch-hax seems the more popular route for these sort of things.
So basically, if attract ever is used successfully, the opponent is trapped between a rock and a hard place. Furthermore, it sets up a good environment for you to set something up. Anything from Dragon Dance to Belly Drum may be waiting here.
I admit. This begs the question: Why not just use Yawn, Confuse Ray, and so forth? Why even consider attract at all? They hit almost all pokemon equally (Ignore own tempo and insomnia pokemon for now...) and already get the job done.
One answer stands out above all, there are very few pokemon who can learn Yawn and/or Confuse Ray. If you can, most likely it would be a much better choice to just use the standard attacks.
So what potential is there? Well, the #1 potential I see is a Female-Wall counter. Both Blissey and Cresselia are 100% female, meaning any male special sweeper can effectively demolish their walling capabilities. If you're attracted, you cannot softboil or moonlight 50% of the time.
Okay, well, discuss :-p