1 (Water). What types can make effective use of defensively-oriented moves that coordinate with eligible abilities?
I'd like to bring more attention to the idea of Water/Dragon for Cap25w, as I believe that it offers a unique, unexplored defensive typing with two very useful 4x resistances, effectively nullifying a certain kraken. While most water types aren't known for their diverse reliable recovery moves or the ability to paralyze opponents many dragons have vast movepools that tend to include a greater variety of reliable recovery(mostly roost, although between latias and cyclohm, dragons have the option to use slack off as well) and/or utility moves such as thunder wave and glare. Dragons also tend to have a natural affinity for dragon tail, offering an interesting phasing option, but we would have to be careful to not encroach on arghonaut's circle throw spikes phasing strategy. Dragon types tend to show a diverse ability pool as well, including defensive abilities such as multiscale and marvel scale(also including rough skin and natural cure only to show the diversity of abilities, not arguing for them, as they are banned)
4. Given our BST limitations, how can we intelligently use typing in order to prevent our starter trio from being outclassed by similar Grass, Fire, and Water Pokemon, even if they should share a somewhat similar role? Read: how can we use typing to carve out a new role in the CAP metagame?
I believe that with the role as a bulky water type, this CAP will face stiff competition from Toxapex and Arghonaut as a bulky water type. I think that this CAP can set itself apart as a bulky water with recovery and a beneficial defensive ability by using a diverse movepool to provide a passable offensive presence. While Arghonaut does have a diverse movepool, I hardly see it running many offensive moves bar earthquake and circle throw. This CAP can use a diverse movepool of many elemental moves indicitave of a dragon type to forego pure stalling capabilities by denting the opposing team.
I hope I kept to the framework and concept there, I'm more than happy to clear up any confusion my ramblings may have caused.
I'd like to bring more attention to the idea of Water/Dragon for Cap25w, as I believe that it offers a unique, unexplored defensive typing with two very useful 4x resistances, effectively nullifying a certain kraken. While most water types aren't known for their diverse reliable recovery moves or the ability to paralyze opponents many dragons have vast movepools that tend to include a greater variety of reliable recovery(mostly roost, although between latias and cyclohm, dragons have the option to use slack off as well) and/or utility moves such as thunder wave and glare. Dragons also tend to have a natural affinity for dragon tail, offering an interesting phasing option, but we would have to be careful to not encroach on arghonaut's circle throw spikes phasing strategy. Dragon types tend to show a diverse ability pool as well, including defensive abilities such as multiscale and marvel scale(also including rough skin and natural cure only to show the diversity of abilities, not arguing for them, as they are banned)
4. Given our BST limitations, how can we intelligently use typing in order to prevent our starter trio from being outclassed by similar Grass, Fire, and Water Pokemon, even if they should share a somewhat similar role? Read: how can we use typing to carve out a new role in the CAP metagame?
I believe that with the role as a bulky water type, this CAP will face stiff competition from Toxapex and Arghonaut as a bulky water type. I think that this CAP can set itself apart as a bulky water with recovery and a beneficial defensive ability by using a diverse movepool to provide a passable offensive presence. While Arghonaut does have a diverse movepool, I hardly see it running many offensive moves bar earthquake and circle throw. This CAP can use a diverse movepool of many elemental moves indicitave of a dragon type to forego pure stalling capabilities by denting the opposing team.
I hope I kept to the framework and concept there, I'm more than happy to clear up any confusion my ramblings may have caused.