Been ultimately satisfied with most of the discussion so far so I believe we should be good to go with the following limits:
Speed Cap: 110 < x < 142
*: These penalties are cumulative, meaning that should you submit a spread that has all of these 5 options as defining moves, you will induce a -60 BSR Penalty!
I saw the higher speed penalty arguments but I ultimately believe its best to leave them as they are, the TLT will work tiredlessly to prevent BSR abuse and potentially broken spread regardless, so I think its just smarter to go with this rather than apply additional speed penalties at every stage for the sake of trying to fix the formula. Penalties on the likes of Apple Acid, Wisp and stronger Fire Coverage have been altered to reflect what the community wants for them. There's been push for a lower T-Value but I feel we are very deep into the stage and thus its not advisable to change it, especially since a consensus was never reached as to a clear lower value. I have also decided to keep base limits as they are.
Your turn, Spammernoob.
T = 2.25 | Base Limits | Flamethrower / Fire Blast | Mystical Fire | Will'o'Wisp | Apple Acid | Speed > 124 | Speed > 130 | Speed > 138 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PS | 100 | | | |||||
SS | 170 | |||||||
PT | 140 | |||||||
ST | 130 | |||||||
BSR | 660 | -10* | -5* | -5* | -20* | -5* | -5* | -10* |
*: These penalties are cumulative, meaning that should you submit a spread that has all of these 5 options as defining moves, you will induce a -60 BSR Penalty!
I saw the higher speed penalty arguments but I ultimately believe its best to leave them as they are, the TLT will work tiredlessly to prevent BSR abuse and potentially broken spread regardless, so I think its just smarter to go with this rather than apply additional speed penalties at every stage for the sake of trying to fix the formula. Penalties on the likes of Apple Acid, Wisp and stronger Fire Coverage have been altered to reflect what the community wants for them. There's been push for a lower T-Value but I feel we are very deep into the stage and thus its not advisable to change it, especially since a consensus was never reached as to a clear lower value. I have also decided to keep base limits as they are.
Your turn, Spammernoob.
