cool website that lets you review anything with a wikipedia page
https://compend.org/
share reviews you make or reviews you find
https://compend.org/
share reviews you make or reviews you find
-
Follow our Instagram!
-
Curious about what we're currently doing about bots? Check out the latest updates from staff in this thread.
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
compend.org
- Thread starter internet
- Start date
Went to this website and the first thing I saw was premarital sex.
5 stars i presume
finally, it's come true
This is fun! I randomly* chose articles and reviewed them with modified* haiku.
The third line creates disconnect from the prior two, inviting you to bridge the gap, paralleling the 切れ字 kireji without recreating it entirely.
If you're like me, you're sometimes not sure how to engage with poetry. If you feel that way, I encourage you to do whatever you feel like or find fun or valuable.
The third line creates disconnect from the prior two, inviting you to bridge the gap, paralleling the 切れ字 kireji without recreating it entirely.
If you're like me, you're sometimes not sure how to engage with poetry. If you feel that way, I encourage you to do whatever you feel like or find fun or valuable.
As people who have used random on Wikipedia may know, it tends to return very obscure articles. I took a random article, used the first word in the text I actually understood well enough to review, and took that article (or its closest match) as my review.
To my understanding, there is not one authoritative way to pursue the haiku form in English. I took form elements I liked, including some flexibility. Here is the form I use, where S represents a strong syllable and w represents a weak one.
S w S /
S w S w S OR w S w S OR S w S w /
free, but fewer syllables than line 2, and neighboring syllables do not share emphasis level
I use / because, on the website, not all text formatting of reviews shows my line breaks.
To my understanding, there is not one authoritative way to pursue the haiku form in English. I took form elements I liked, including some flexibility. Here is the form I use, where S represents a strong syllable and w represents a weak one.
S w S /
S w S w S OR w S w S OR S w S w /
free, but fewer syllables than line 2, and neighboring syllables do not share emphasis level
I use / because, on the website, not all text formatting of reviews shows my line breaks.
Last edited:
I just finished my 50th review!
Overall, I'm a generous rater. 3 is neutral for me.
Here are my top 5 subjects I've reviewed.
Here are the other subjects I gave five stars.
Last, and certainly least, here are all the subjects I've reviewed negatively.
I've had a lot of fun with the site and plan to keep reviewing. If you want more of this unusual thing I do, you can see my past and future reviews here: https://compend.org/u/ado.
Overall, I'm a generous rater. 3 is neutral for me.
Here are my top 5 subjects I've reviewed.
Here are the other subjects I gave five stars.
- Building
- Castle
- Contemporary art
- Feminism
- Midfielder
- Museum
- Rock (geology)
- Trade union
Last, and certainly least, here are all the subjects I've reviewed negatively.
I've had a lot of fun with the site and plan to keep reviewing. If you want more of this unusual thing I do, you can see my past and future reviews here: https://compend.org/u/ado.
Last edited:
I'm going to assume all of these reviews are haikus and the only reason they don't follow the syllable structure is due to being translated from Japanese to English.
Yep! I talk some more about my structure in my first post in the thread. 5-7-5 in English syllables is a bit bulky and long for my personal preference, so I run lower, and I build some flexibility in just cause I like it.
i'm a stickler for
the five-seven five structure
but these posts are good
where is your cutting word. where is your reference to a season.