I'm not sure I understand the train of thought that leads to the assumption, could you elaborate?Also a question I want everybody to answer is do you believe people who claim should most likely get lynched? yes or no and why
In theory it would depend on the quality of the scumhunting that led to them feeling a necessity to claim in the first place. If they were being heavily pressured and failing to adequately defend themselves pre-claim then most likely yes they should be lynched. If they claim with no pressure at all to direct scum hunting then probably don't lynch them but try and verify information and/or sheep them if they can sufficiently justify their solve.







