what else would it be. it would be foolish for schia to claim anyone is redchecked as vanilla town
-
Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
NOC eli loves matrices game thread [Game Over, Town Win!]
- Thread starter Nuxl
- Start date
maybe schia is doing some weird play where they claim red on ls because they're just so confident ls scum but it's too reckless because they would know if they happen to be wrong then they certainly get killed in response
so I dont see any reason to not go through with ls > schia unless you have information that contradicts their claim aura
town is still in a good place even if me schia and two others in nk dies (unless schia is maf doing this lol) math works out to be 5 town 1 mafia. seems like they’re going for a babe ruth called shot, esp given the academy joke post. up to y’all if you want to whittle down numbers to that
(math is I get voted here, someone gets nk’d, schia is voted tomorrow ostensibly, someone gets nk’d, then day 5 starts post-schia/ls mess)
I consider logic and a careful reading of the wording of schia's posts to be evidence that schia has not actually claimed. Or at best only soft-claimed.
well sheeping realiti hasn't steered me wrong so I'm just gonna do that
I totally disagree ftr and that's why schia if you're not serious and doing some gambit walk it back cause you're putting us at a huge risk. after you and schia die were probably left with like me/om/celever/laurel/+1 which is not a group I feel confident will solve the game
I consider that it would be silly to do this as either alignment if its fake
There's an interpretation I have that redchecked referred not to LS, but to Vizh as an if-Vizh-then-also-LS argument that I missed.
I just dont think it would make sense to say what schia said if that's the point they're trying to get across
especially since in no way was it established that vizh and ls were like lock 0artners
im not going to fight schia fwiw given that I’m on borrowed time already from d2 where it was only bc I made the Vizh wagon happen that saved my neck and my behavior is default scumread by others. AG has been very kind to not simply fall in line behind schia but it isn’t going to be me pushing schia to visit this discussion point again. I’m obviously town in my eyes (source: role pm) and if town feels the best way to find maf isto confirm I’m not and put lasers on schia tomorrow, then I’m going to go along with it
see I agree but vizhs reaction did kinda give "last minute stabbed by scum teammate"
like if anyone in wikimafia @ celever schia om hydro remembers when I last minute tried to vote m2h it temindedme of that
like if anyone in wikimafia @ celever schia om hydro remembers when I last minute tried to vote m2h it temindedme of that
Could also be referring to M24 or you, or possibly realiti. Probably not HH though. I still very much want a reply from Schia about if that was a claim or a conclusion based on Vizh's reaction.
well it cant be referring to m24 because m24 is dead but yes
why probably not hydro specifically
Gut feeling, based on posters around that time. m24 (disproven) and realiti for being early voters. You for being one of the nails in the coffin aside LS.
I think my interactions with vizh are pretty clearing but a redcheck on ls is even more clearing so we'll see what schia says
like ftr I was the first person to give vizh any attention, I actively fought against townread on him and tried to build momentum on his wagon d1, I have no reason to vote him over ls if we're partners, and somehow vizhs course of action is to hard defend me every time my name comes up in a very pocket way because he feared the psyclone and wanted to reduce the heat I was giving him
I still miss om