• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

NFE Pokemon in UU

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think we should focus on completing the teir list we have right not (what are the NU pokes again?) before we dabble in adding the rest of the 498

people are working on the OU list already, the teirs are quite settled. but there are 200+ pokemon that do not even have a teir, it would not be that hard to give them one.

edit: here is the first set:

Bulbasaur NU
Ivysaur UU

Charmander NU
Charmeleon UU

Squirtle NU
Wartortle UU

Caterpie NU/IU*
Metapod NU/IU*

Weedle NU/IU*
Kakuna NU/IU*

Pidgey NU
Pidgeotto NU

Rattata NU

Spearow NU

Ekans NU

Sandshrew NU

Nidoran-F NU
Nidorina NU

Nidoran-M NU
Nidorino NU (maybe UU? ok stats + good movepool)

Clefairy NU (maybe UU? magic guard, however the stats are just too low)

Vulpix UU

Jigglypuff NU (maybe UU? base 115 HP, but the defences are 20 and 25)

Zubat NU
Golbat UU

Oddish NU
Gloom NU (maybe UU? 85 base sp. attack + Chlorophyl maybe too good a sunnybeamer for NU, but speed is base 40)

Paras NU

Venonat NU

Diglett NU (maybe UU? 95 speed and 55 base attack + arena trap, but lol at the 10 HP and 25/45 defences)

Meowth NU

Psyduck NU

Mankey NU

Growlithe NU (maybe UU? decent all round stats and a okayish movepool)

what do you think?
i know some of you may not agree that all these pokes need teiring, but just as far as will any of these pokemon overpower the teir i put them in, and could they be moved down?

* IU stands for Impossible to Use, a fake teir.

Also sorry if this is hasty, i dont want this topic to stagnate and thought this would promote discution.
 
I think we should focus on completing the teir list we have right not (what are the NU pokes again?) before we dabble in adding the rest of the 498
Arguably we should hash out the UU tiering for NFEs (if any) first, because no one plays NU, whereas some people actually play UU.
 
Nidorino NU (maybe UU? ok stats + good movepool)

Nidorino's one "ok" stat is Atk (72) which is only 2 points higher than Beautifly ... it's movepoll might be good but its stats are too poor to do much with it. Add to that the fact that Arbok and Seviper, who in IMH are both superior to Nidorino, struggle to see much use, you wouldn't be doing it many favours by placing it in UU ...


Clefairy NU (maybe UU? magic guard, however the stats are just too low)
Jigglypuff NU (maybe UU? base 115 HP, but the defences are 20 and 25)

You've answered your own question with this one ...

Vulpix UU

Why? Ninetales is already UU ... and there is nothing significantly different about Vulpix to warrant its inclusion in the same tier.

Gloom NU (maybe UU? 85 base sp. attack + Chlorophyl maybe too good a sunnybeamer for NU, but speed is base 40)

See above only substituting Vulpix for Gloom, and Ninetales for Vileplume.

Growlithe NU (maybe UU? decent all round stats and a okayish movepool)

Base 70 is more "average" than "decent" ... so really you have a pokemon with average stats and an average movepool, who if moved to UU would competing with Ninetales, Torkoal, Rapidash, Camerupt and Flareon in the Fire type department.
 
This just seems like a big, useless waste of effort. The tiers exist to help competitive players define roughly how powerful any given pokemon is - those who want to use their favourites will probably continue to do so regardless of the tier system. My boyfriend for example really likes Pidgeotto and Nidorino - both NFE version of UU Pokemon. He uses them because he likes them, not because there's any chance in hell that they'll be better than Nidoking and Pidgeot at any given time, and so when he uses them in battles he's not really giving a shit about the tier system - his enjoyment comes not from battling with the most competitive pokemon, but from playing with his favourites, which is not what this site is about.

In my opinion, attention should be devoted to those pokemon that can actually compete in environments such as UU, which is a pretty dead tier as it is. This would involve limiting the tiering process to NFE pokemon whose fully evolved forms live in OU, examining their stats and movepools to see those that might stand a chance in UU, and going from there - as well as the NFEs that are significantly different from their fully evolved form (as in, they possess moves, abilities, types or stats that it's fully evolved form cannot share). The pokemon that fit the criteria described above would be examined, compared to the tiered pokemon, and tiered from there.

Designating 60% of all pokemon as NU is lovely and all, but when it comes to battling the only people it's going to be relevant for are going to be the same people for whom it's just not going to matter. Mind you, this being the internet, someone's bound to get around to doing it sooner or later. :p
 
This just seems like a big, useless waste of effort.
its realy not that hard, those pokemon only took me 30 mins or so, and i am happy do do more if it helps.

The tiers exist to help competitive players define roughly how powerful any given pokemon is
not exactly, they exist to give each pokemon a place in witch it can be used.

those who want to use their favourites will probably continue to do so regardless of the tier system. My boyfriend for example really likes Pidgeotto and Nidorino - both NFE version of UU Pokemon. He uses them because he likes them, not because there's any chance in hell that they'll be better than Nidoking and Pidgeot at any given time, and so when he uses them in battles he's not really giving a shit about the tier system - his enjoyment comes not from battling with the most competitive pokemon, but from playing with his favourites, which is not what this site is about.

but what if he wanted to use the pokemon in an enviroment that they stood a chance? in a place that they would be "competive".

In my opinion, attention should be devoted to those pokemon that can actually compete in environments such as UU, which is a pretty dead tier as it is. This would involve limiting the tiering process to NFE pokemon whose fully evolved forms live in OU, examining their stats and movepools to see those that might stand a chance in UU, and going from there - as well as the NFEs that are significantly different from their fully evolved form (as in, they possess moves, abilities, types or stats that it's fully evolved form cannot share). The pokemon that fit the criteria described above would be examined, compared to the tiered pokemon, and tiered from there.
well why not tier the rest as we go? its not hard and those that have evos in the same tier will simply not be used, the tiering is just so we know where everything goes.

Designating 60% of all pokemon as NU is lovely and all, but when it comes to battling the only people it's going to be relevant for are going to be the same people for whom it's just not going to matter. Mind you, this being the internet, someone's bound to get around to doing it sooner or later. :p

well i was kinda thinking of adding an extra tier below NU, but i dont know if it will catch on.


Shiny Oddish said:
Nidorino's one "ok" stat is Atk (72) which is only 2 points higher than Beautifly ... it's movepoll might be good but its stats are too poor to do much with it. Add to that the fact that Arbok and Seviper, who in IMH are both superior to Nidorino, struggle to see much use, you wouldn't be doing it many favours by placing it in UU ...

well i did put NU as trhe first option, and have little experience of NU. i was wondering if it would be too powerful for NU but i see your point.... NU then.

Shiny Oddish said:
eric the espeon said:
Clefairy NU (maybe UU? magic guard, however the stats are just too low)
Jigglypuff NU (maybe UU? base 115 HP, but the defences are 20 and 25)
You've answered your own question with this one ...

i was highlighting the ones that i was not 100% sure about.

Shiny Oddish said:
Why? Ninetales is already UU ... and there is nothing significantly different about Vulpix to warrant its inclusion in the same tier.

why not? i am trying to tier each pokemon, even if they stay in the same tier as there evo.

Shiny Oddish said:
Base 70 is more "average" than "decent" ... so really you have a pokemon with average stats and an average movepool, who if moved to UU would competing with Ninetales, Torkoal, Rapidash, Camerupt and Flareon in the Fire type department.
the question is not would it work in UU but would it overpower NU? i dont think so, but anyway.
 
I am currently working on a tiering system that classifies all NFE's. I am a bit busy at the moment and so do not have much time to finish it.

However, that is no reason why we cannot begin the tiering of NFE's. Because of the hazy vagueness of the lower boundary between UU and NU at the moment, I believe it would be folly to actually begin the tiering of NFE's by focusing attention into NU. In addition, it is certain that the almost overwhelming majority of initial forms will end up in NU. Thus, the side-effect of tiering NFE's into NU will be definition of the NU game. This makes tiering NFE's into NU slightly dangerous if careful thought is not given to the process.

My intent in beginning the tiering process of NFE pokemon was to determine which of these were unsuitable for use in UU. While it is indeed important and probably inevitable that someone, even if it isn't me, will tier all NFE's in a way that becomes accepted, it is not the most important question that this process attempts to answer.

Therefore, I begin by proposing a prototypical BL tier of NFE's. Every NFE not on this list will be available for use in UU and the lower tier metagames:


Chansey (This is a sop thrown to the Blissey haters. If someone wants to argue for Chansey inclusion, by all means do so. Everyone will despise you.)
Dusclops (It wasn’t even UU last generation and now has Will-O-Wisp.)
Haunter (Gengar 0.5, it lacks Focus Punch. However, it is still almost as diverse as its evolution.)
Hippopotas (auto-weather)
Snover (auto-weather)
Kadabra (Diverse movepool and high power)

Questionable Metagame Influence – It is harder to determine whether the following would break the UU metagame. The question of whether to send the following to Borderline or allow them in UU may be debated:

Magneton (Magnet Pull and Magnet Rise may slay Aggron and possibly other steels.)
Sneasel (Sneasel has a paltry base attack but it possesses the movepool of its evolution. With Swords Dance it still might break UU)
Rhydon (It has a higher ATK and sp def tier than Aggron but lower on the def tier. Both have glaring 4x weaknesses. The high Attack may see it banned.)
Gligar (Gligar has improved substantially since last generation, gaining a good recovery move and stuff like Stone Edgeand Night Slash. However, it lacks the elemental fangs of its evolution. If included, it would counter Pinsir handily though.)


Notice that I have NOT divided the pokemon up by similarity to their evolutionary forms; rather, I have simply tried to classify them based on their possible impact on the UU metagame.
Furthermore, I see the banning of any NFE's as something like the banning of Deoxys-E on Shoddy: they may be tested at some later date to have their brokenness empirically determined.

As I have stated earlier, all other pokemon would be allowed in UU. Tiering of NFE pokemon into NU will take place at some later date unscheduled.



To Kestrel: Like your boyfriend, I too enjoy playing with my favorites. Being a competitive battler, I also enjoy coming up with original new strategies and battling against the metagame, while others with closed minds and a lack of appreciation for the elements available to imaginative players may have derided as pointless and not worth thinking about from the competitive angle.
It is for that purpose, of playing with my favorites, that I desire to tier NFE's. Others without that vision use "significant difference" as a way to limit the scope of the UU metagame and thus attempt to ban pokemon like Pidgeotto and Nidorino from even being allowed in the metagame.

Significant difference should be irrelevent to tiering of NFE's. Primarily it is artificial and ultimately it is arbitrary. Honestly, it is rather blind to say that a Magikarp is in any way similar to Gyarados, and furthermore that approach brushes over subtle differences that make the difference between artifical metagames and ones that more closely approach the perfect.

I am not trying to build a different foundation than Eric. Rather, I am first creating a stopgap tier list of NFE's that all battlers can begin to operate upon. After that is completed, more comprehensive work can continue.

Edit: Also, I don't think a tier below NU is necessary. It will be developed only when people actually playing that metagame find there should be one.
 
dark: so you think we should alow all NFEs into UU bar a few first and hold back on the NFE's to NU for now... ok makes sence. i mostly agree with your list but i think snover and hippotas should be tested at the same time as gligar. and all the "Questionable Metagame Influence" should be banned to start with.

i thin that if we do let NFE's into NU we will need a extra metagame, OU has 49 pokemon more if you add in BL, but with NFE's NU will have >200 pokemon, far too much. a extra tier will make the metagame more aprochable to new players. i beleve the reason so few people play UU is that it is too large, i think spliting each tier up till each has between 50 and 100 pokemon each would help the game. but a <NU tier is a good start.
 
i mostly agree with your list but i think snover and hippotas should be tested at the same time as gligar. and all the "Questionable Metagame Influence" should be banned to start with.

Given that both snover and hippotas will have far more of an impact on the UU metagame than the "questionables", why do you want them tested, but the questionables banned?
 
dark: so you think we should alow all NFEs into UU bar a few first and hold back on the NFE's to NU for now... ok makes sence. i mostly agree with your list but i think snover and hippotas should be tested at the same time as gligar. and all the "Questionable Metagame Influence" should be banned to start with.

i thin that if we do let NFE's into NU we will need a extra metagame, OU has 49 pokemon more if you add in BL, but with NFE's NU will have >200 pokemon, far too much. a extra tier will make the metagame more aprochable to new players. i beleve the reason so few people play UU is that it is too large, i think spliting each tier up till each has between 50 and 100 pokemon each would help the game. but a <NU tier is a good start.

Actually, assuming that my divisions of NFE's are accepted, I would then proceed by progressively unbanning pokemon in the QMI category to test them.

The general feeling of the people in the BL/UU thread seemed to be, when the the banning of Snover and Hippopotas was decided, that auto-weather was something as game-breaking as allowing something like Crobat; i.e. that it broke the metagame in an obvious way. Thus, it is low on the scale for testing.
 
Having read this thread for the last hour or so, I think what I'd ultimately support are all NFEs included in UU, with the exception of Chansey, Dusclops, Haunter, Hippopotas, and Snover. I honestly think those Pokemon would have too large of an impact and would affect the UU environment in more negative aspects than positive.

I do have a question, though. Would people continue to use Grumpig, Hypno and/or Noctowl if Chansey were included? I honestly think that including Chansey would be very unfair to special attackers, as they just wouldn't be able to power through it. Could most UU teams handle combinations of both Chansey and Duskclops? There aren't as many fighters with Guts, I think, and I don't think they have ways to hit Ghosts SE.
 
I do have a question, though. Would people continue to use Grumpig, Hypno and/or Noctowl if Chansey were included?

Of the three the mention, the only one that I use with any regularity is Noctowl, and yes I would continue to use it because unlike Chansey it can phaze as well as wall ...

Could most UU teams handle combinations of both Chansey and Duskclops?

Possibly ... but you would probably have to dedicate the majority of your team to doing it ...
 
I would still use my Hypno because of that immunity to sleep and the fact that he resists Fighting moves, something that my team desperately needs.
 
Given that both snover and hippotas will have far more of an impact on the UU metagame than the "questionables", why do you want them tested, but the questionables banned?

i want both groups baned to start with, then both groups tested. however you have MUCH more experience at UU than me and if you beleve that auto weather would be totaly broken they can be tested later.
 
All I'll say at this juncture is that, IMHO, the inclusion of auto-weather would impede diversity rather than encouraging it, which I believe is your goal as regards NFE's ...
 
How would auto-weather break the UU game? Would it create too much synergy for UU pokes to dominate others?

Man, they really need to make a "remove all weather" move/ability for the next gen.
 
How would auto-weather break the UU game? Would it create too much synergy for UU pokes to dominate others?

There is already concern regarding Glaceon's power in UU (base 130 SpAtk) without giving it 100% accurate Blizzards and a possible evasion boost with Snow Cloak. Constant hail would of course be a huge boon to Froslass, and then there would also be Stallrein to contend with.

Constant sand would make Cradily a monster, aswell as Gligar (if allowed)

Being immune to passive damage Clefable useage would rise further (and I'm completely against anything that promotes that), and there is a risk of entire metagame becoming more stall based ...
 
There is already concern regarding Glaceon's power in UU (base 130 SpAtk) without giving it 100% accurate Blizzards and a possible evasion boost with Snow Cloak. Constant hail would of course be a huge boon to Froslass, and then there would also be Stallrein to contend with.

Constant sand would make Cradily a monster, aswell as Gligar (if allowed)

Being immune to passive damage Clefable useage would rise further (and I'm completely against anything that promotes that), and there is a risk of entire metagame becoming more stall based ...
I feel that allowing auto-weather Pokemon would make pretty much all those Pokemon you listed that benefit from it BL material, as well as be the final straw as far as Clefable's UU status is concerned (I mean, come on, it would be everywhere and everyone would be sick to death of it).

I am of the strong opinion that auto-weather has no place in UU for the purpose of diversity as Shiny Oddish has already mentioned. The three main tiers of the D/P metagame currently have their own unique environment, namely:

Ubers - Rain/Sun

OU - Sand/Hail

UU - No automatic weather. If you want to benefit from a certain weather effect you must create it yourself with a moveslot. This allows a greater amount of viable Pokemon without any dominating strategy

and I believe it should remain that way.

In all honesty I never had that big a problem with NFEs in UU, in fact I look forward to finally being able to try out the likes of Magneton, Togetic and Piloswine there, but the day that Hippopotas and Snover are allowed in will probably be the day I give up on UU for good.
 
I'd consider playing UU if I could use a Charmeleon, since Charizard is so underpowered in OU. He'd still be worse than Ninetales, but he would be usable.
 
Shiney Oddish, the solution to that whole conundrum is that Glaceon, Froslass and Wallrein get bumped up to BL. Problem solved. That's what BL is anyways. It's the pokes that are too effective for UU and not popular enough for OU.

If the point of this whole discussion is to allow players to use their favorite NFEs, then bumping other pokes up probably makes more more sense than effectively banning certain characters by putting them in the same tier as their evolved form.

I think the problem is that people are looking to add 200+ pokemon to the UU/NU environment and expect the current metagame to remain the same. It won't. In fact, Snover is just one example of how UU/NU could suddenly become a much deeper experience for competitive battlers. Adding these pokemon will significantly change the environment so why not let the environment change instead of trying to shoe-horn the old system in so people don't have to change their teams?
 
Shiney Oddish, the solution to that whole conundrum is that Glaceon, Froslass and Wallrein get bumped up to BL. Problem solved. That's what BL is anyways. It's the pokes that are too effective for UU and not popular enough for OU.
Of course that's a 3:1 trade, "I want to use snover so I'm going to eliminate these other pokemon from UU". From a sheer numbers standpoint it makes more sense to eliminate the 1, rather than 3 from the useable pool.
 
Plus, the removal of Walrein would severely mess with its usability in OU. UU's the only place it has for non-Stallreinness.
 
I think you have forgotten about Togetic.

It doesn't learn Aura Sphere or Air Slash which are probably Togekiss' most common attacks. It's also very slow. So it would play very differently from its evolved form. It doesn't do anything better than Togekiss, however.
 
Shiney Oddish, the solution to that whole conondrum is that Glaceon, Froslass and Wallrein get bumped up to BL. Problem solved. That's what BL is anyways. It's the pokes that are too effective for UU and not popular enough for OU.

If the point of this whole discussion is to allow players to use their favorite NFEs, then bumping other pokes up probably makes more more sense than effectively banning certain characters by putting them in the same tier as their evolved form.

Accept the problem isn't really solved ...

You are proposing we lose six currently acceptable and usable pokemon to make room for two NFE's who will contribute little more than their trait. Whilst I'm sure there are those that would be delighted to see Snover and Hippopotas available, there are those that would resent this being at the expense of their favourites ...

Adding these pokemon will significantly change the environment so why not let the environment change instead of trying to shoe-horn the old system in so people don't have to change their teams?

It's not necessarily a case of people not wanting to change their teams ... there are players, myself included, who play UU simply because it is distinct from the OU environment. The inclusion of auto-weather would eliminate this distinction and run the very real risk of simply recreating a similar OUish environment albeit with weaker pokemon.

Not to mention that a number of strategies more common to UU Flail/Reversal, Sunny day, suddenly become a lot less viable ... all for the sake of 2 NFE's.

This proposed "unbanning" of all NFE pokemon is not popular with all UU players, and there has to be a degree of compromise on both sides if this expanded UU is ever going to work.

*Edit*

I really need to type quicker ... >_>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top