As optimistic as I am about teamtours getting people to look at other gens/formats, this is the cold hard truth of it. Let's say that some major ban, like Pinsir, would happen before ZUPL. I hate to rephrase what you've already said so well, but I feel it's worth doing anyway: despite being the most prestigious teamtour for ZU, less overall development would happen in the RBY ZU meta compared to the rapid surge of development we saw in RBYPL with RBY UU post PT ban. Because there's only a small handful of RBYers actually in the tour, and the odds of managers having an understanding of the meta is(unfortunately) slimmer. In RBYPL, even if you weren't playing RBY UU in the actual game slot you likely had at least two or three hands behind the scenes discussing, testing and pushing the meta forward overall.The thing about ZUOL and ZUCL is that these are cross-gen teamtours. The appeal of tours like RBYPL, RBYWC, and RBYOMPL are that the team is compromised almost entirely of rbyers. In cross-gen teamtours, the RBY slot is often on their own and has nobody to help them prep unless they bring some of their friends as support. In an RBY-focused teamtour, there are plenty of teammates to help you with prep. This also leads to overall faster meta development, since you have multiple talented RBYers working together to push the tier forward. Ubers, and UU-PU have RBYPL for this, and ZU deserves a tier as well. Especially since current ZU is still in its infancy, this is the perfect opportunity for the metagame to develop. An RBY forum teamtour is a much better opportunity to advance the metagame than any individual or crossgen teamtour ever will be.
(This is not a reason to prevent banning a pokemon before a big tour btw. I'm more using this in service of explaining your greater point that RBY exclusive tours > cross gen in terms of servicing RBY tiers)
I'll even up the ante a bit: If people are hating the current stage of ZU, that's all the more reason to put it here in some capacity so that we can get toward making it a better tier in the eyes of the playerbase.
I would be very OK with this considering ZUCL is going on right now and to my knowledge it's featuring the Pinsir meta. This would give us two different tournaments(in which people will be playing to try and win serious games) in which to compare the Pinsir and Pinsirless metas.If it were up to me, I'd run OMPL as a Pinsirless suspect to see how it feels compared to the ongoing ZUPL with all mons legal. Pinsir, while having a lot of possible checks, forces a ton of the tier to run an 85% accurate move to deal with it, and if even one of them misses, Pinsir threatens to run away with the game after a single well-timed SD. Could be rushing to conclusions on my part, and I'm happy to recant that if developments in ZUCL make things less coinflippy overall, but it could be something to consider.
Last edited:




