That would maybe be viable if we were still at 1 Fascist, but now we kinda in a hurry now, so if one of them is fascist I'm completely okay with removing them from the pool. The main reason to check is to prove our perception of the game correct. If this goes through with a liberal, we have some fascist in liberal places.
I agree! And for the time being, I'm not 100% sure if trusting anyone that has passed a fascist policy is a smart idea at this point.
I'm more concerned about floaters masquerading as hitler. I also wanted to get lightwolf to commit to shit earlier under the gun of trustworthy people cause the zorbees investigation has always been crap but now we've missed that chance.
I am fine sitting out for a while considering the 50-50 but Whydon admitted to being at fault in the second time I was up so idk what you're trying to imply here.
I haven't done a count yet but does someone have the numbers on whether consecutive triple fascist cards could feasibly have been pulled?
Yeah that was definitely feasible. Assuming everyone before that spoke the truth, we only had 1 lib and 7 fas remaining in deck before the consecutive triple fascist. Pulling 3 fascist out of that twice is not unlikely at all
it may be non indicative, but that doesn't change that we reached the end of the testing stage.
Also Blazade why say "I am fine sitting out for a while". There is no while here, you are the only group where the pair contradicted each other. Neither you nor zorbees is getting another turn. You ain't setting up any chances to get elected in the future on my watch.