• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

Smogon Tour 20 Standings

Just to clarify: if you get a bye, you have to win the next round to get the points even if it's after r1 (thats why Decision Makers got 7pts in ORAS instead of 9 for example). With that being said, i want to thank Soldier, RedMaxx and Zokuru for helping me with counting the pts. You guys rule *-* (Soldier still suck tho)
 
Cicada said:
Just to clarify: if you get a bye, you have to win the next round to get the points even if it's after r1 (thats why Decision Makers got 7pts in ORAS instead of 9 for example). With that being said, i want to thank Soldier, RedMaxx and Zokuru for helping me with counting the pts. You guys rule *-* (Soldier still suck tho)
Click to expand...
From what I understand, if you get a bye r1 and lose r2 you get 0 points, however, by winning r2 you get 2 points (and return to the normal point value). So if decision maker won r6 he should get 9 points even if he had a first round bye. I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure that's how it works (that's how slams being run I think), might want to ask a TD.
 
atomicllamas said:
From what I understand, if you get a bye r1 and lose r2 you get 0 points, however, by winning r2 you get 2 points (and return to the normal point value). So if decision maker won r6 he should get 9 points even if he had a first round bye. I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure that's how it works (that's how slams being run I think), might want to ask a TD.
Click to expand...
That's how it works yea
 
Yes. What Cicada meant is different tho.
Decision Makers got a bye in R6 because his opponent was found to be an alt, and lost in R7. Instead of getting 9 pts as if he had won his R6, he only got 7 since he lost in the round after (and didn't beat anyone in R6 since it was a bye).

llamas -.-'
 
blame Soldier ;_;

By the way, i've made a sheet on the spread for those who have a chance to be in playoffs containing Rankings, Win % (which will serve as a tiebreaker for the 1~15 seeds) and the current cutoff. It can also serve as a graphic interface to see who are out (their name are stricken out).
 
Last edited:
Cicada said:
blame Soldier ;_;

By the way, i've made a sheet on the spread for those who have a chance to be in playoffs containing Rankings, Win % (which will serve as a tiebreaker for the 1~15 seeds) and the current cutoff. It can also serve as a graphic interface to see who are out (their name are stricken out).
Click to expand...
It'd be sick if the playoff sheet had a list of the amount of points gained this week next to the amount of joined tours oo
 
Yea some guys asked me to do it, ill put em when im back home

EDIT: done
 
Last edited:
Sweepage said:
My place in the standings is incorrect.
I have a lower ratio than TDK therefore he is the better seed
Click to expand...

I tried to sort ppl with the same rankings by win %, but that actually messed up the other sheets. Maybe i'll see more in depth how i can do it later
 
Does winning any games today give me a chance to go above TDK in terms of win %

Or is my top performance on the week taken into account only
 
Sweepage said:
Does winning any games today give me a chance to go above TDK in terms of win %

Or is my top performance on the week taken into account only
Click to expand...

Both of the tours you played are taken in account, you have to get at least 5 wins if i calced correctly to go above TDK (i.e you need to win your r5)
 
Cicada said:
Both of the tours you played are taken in account, you have to get at least 5 wins if i calced correctly to go above TDK (i.e you need to win your r5)
Click to expand...
breh i don't think you get it. I don't want to go above him. I want to stay in 4th seed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top