SS Random Battle Dynamax Suspect - Voter Identification Thread (READ THE OP!)

[Pais]

 

[TrueNora]

 

[Anty]

apologies to all who I flamed

 

[Slimmer]

Hide

 

[Zirpeise]

this is important to me

reqs

 

[RaJ.Shoot]

A productive use of my day. Confirming as RBDS RA

 

[Alpha]

Confirming as RBDS alpha.

Hide

 

[pbapali]

If you don't get it at exactly 60 games, don't give up! Playing high-ladder players to earn this was worth it in the end.

 

[Raidriar]

RBDS Raidriar

No more 100 turn games (no to ban)

 

[m.leonardi]

Is this ok? will my vote count if i post it here?
Anyway I vote against dynamax, as it takes all the ability needed to win a game away. One can set up SD/DD and with max airstream or knuckle the game is over. No fun at all

 

[SnowyTheGlaceon]

Dynamax is more broken than Gen 1 mechanics.

 

[Josh]

 

[LoSconosciuto]

 

[platinumCheesecake]

it is me, the rbds plat

 

[Machattack]

I've warmed to some of the arguments made against banning, but overall it still definitely needs to go. The bottom line is that rands is a lot less fun with dynamax.

Ban.

 

[Altthiel]

Ladies and gentlemen, we got them reqs :D ! s/o to the arcade room ~

 

[l0300891]

Dynamax is a ban for me, no preview and the inherent variability in rands makes it unsuitable imo.

 

[RBDS Dwayne60]

I'm voting DO NOT BAN

 

[Komeko]

 

[Shookington]

RBDS Shook (don't question why 61 games were needed)

 

[Panty&Stockings]

 

[i want a lamp]

took me SIX fuckin alts because i got haxed every single time
#SaveDynamax

 

[papiloco]

i wanted 1800, sad coming from a mainly doubles player this laddering was fun

 

[Gray]

 

[garchompkid445]

For RBDS Garchomp