• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

[Standard]--Console Wars Mafia Game Over! Go Microsoft for wining (not winning)

Whoopee, sensitive information I know nothing about...

In all honesty I have no way to counter that so my hand is pretty much forced, however I'd rather not post my Role PM in the thread for all to see, especially not on the whim of someone who is intent on lynching me without telling me the reasons!

I can tell you now that I'm a member of Team Sony, since I'd rather have my faction exposed than be dead...
 
Hmm, ok.

I'd liek to officially annoucne that IF Slim Guldo is Sony, then the even ratio theory is all wrong.

For the moment, I shall retact my vote. I recommend you guys all claim, so that Veedrock and I can try to negotiate a lynch target.
 
Posting to mention I will need to leave until Sunday afternoon at the earliest, and I will not be able to vote. Also calling for a deadline extension, as there seems to be no good target at the moment.
 
Yeah I'd like to second the request for a deadline extension. I have a good target I think (whos not Slim), but I would like to talk with people regarding my suspicions. So far I have: 3 claims, 1 reject to claim, 1 suspect, and on good terms with Sony. My role is with 1 other person whom I trust at this point, so if push comes to shove, I can have him vouch for me. Those are the numbers I've collected so far fro Nintendo.

I will talk to DW on how we want to work out things. I am going to ask everyone to choose between me and DW as leader for Nintendo. Basically I know I'm clean and I would be easier to clean. The problem with DW putting his role in the thread is that any mafia who wants to mole the village can claim "inspector" and have cleaned DW. That's my only hesitation for people to think about when choosing which of us you want. I don't know anything as to whether DW is clean, and his role isn't really provable, so yeah. I personally don't trust DW at this point, and I don't think you should either. Yesterday, I talked to him and he said he was hesitant to share his role PM with me although he was going to post in the thread. That doesnt make much sense to me ?_?

Also, to add to why I think I would make a better leader is that DW's is a really bad leading role. Why would he want to lead rather than support Nintendo with that role? He's putting a huge target on his back for the Mafia, and if he were to remain hidden in the shadows, he could come in as some surprise help late game. Maybe I'm missing something.
 
undisputed said:
The problem with DW putting his role in the thread is that any mafia who wants to mole the village can claim "inspector" and have cleaned DW.
Click to expand...
That consists of 4 people, including myself. Recall his location on the roof last night? Unless you propose the inspector check him tonight, in which case it doesn't really do much.
 
Until a deadline extension is issued I am going to avoid any attempts at timed stealth lynches.

No Lynch

I am only planting it in case we cant get an extension. I will retract it later if need be but do not role me cause I vote No Lynch. I dont mind a lynch but not stealth
 
Lynch Theangryscientist
Stop bandwagoning. It makes you look bad and makes us think you are microsoft.

I am claiming to undisputed now. My role is pretty useless anyways, so I dont think it matters to who I claim.I dont trust destiny warrior as much because he said he was going to try and mole sony last night, and now he is stepping up for claims.
 
Veedrock® said:
I will roll the hell out of the first person to No Lynch. Fuck that.
Click to expand...

A roll doesn't work without mindless followings, get with the program.

And please, there's 5 Microsoft tops, pointing fingers for every little action isn't going to add up well.
 
Vote theangryscientist

Hey guys Im back.
I told you I would unvote the moment I got back. I SAID I DIDNT WANT TO NO LYNCH BUT AVOID STEALTH LYNCHS WHILE AWAY, APARRENTLY LIKE THAT.

Veedrock's vote was expected. theangryscientists wasnt.

Bandwagoning is bad.
 
Veedrock said:
A roll doesn't work without mindless followings, get with the program.

And please, there's 5 Microsoft tops, pointing fingers for every little action isn't going to add up well.
Click to expand...
Well, it could be 9:9:5:1:1 or 9:9:5:2 with some neutrals who infiltrated beforehand.

Lynch Insomniac. to make him talk. (I see only one post total by him in this thread.)
EDIT: retracted
 
Unless someone has a better lead, TAS is acting scummy and it seems to be a good idea to get rid of him. Also, AG, unless a person is going to get lynched, they wont talk. One vote makes no difference really, though TAS can save himself by voting with you.
 
What do you wan't me to say? DW is making his assumptions on super secret sensitive information IE, wanting us to follow him blindly, and everyone else is trying to roll someone that blinks too fast. Please note that I'm in the basement, so I can't claim to anyone.
 
Hey guys. :)

If someone could tell me who is leading both of the villager factions so I can claim to someone, that would be nice.

Now on to business.

Originally Posted by Fat jigglypuffers42
Dear Destiny Warrior,
You are Animal Crossing.

You go around working for Tom Nook, fishing, and shopping. Don't we need a good boy(or, rather, animal) like that in a mansion?

If anybody allied with Nintendo dies by Night 3, you can PM Jigglypuffers42 with "Night 3- Absorb <User>". You will absorb <User> into your virtual world, allowing you to use his powers for the rest of the game, if any. If nobody allied with Nintendo has died by Night 3, you will be given the choice to use this power every subsequent odd night. This power is one-use only.

You know that there may be more Animal Crossings in this game. However, if they are present, they will not know of this.

You are allied with Team Nintendo. You win if Team Nintendo defeats all opposing factions.
Click to expand...

Please tell me someone else thinks this is a fake. Especially the part that I bolded. Two Animal Crossings? I'm having trouble believing that. HFB could have just stuck it in there just in case there really was a real Animal Crossing allied with Nintendo and he would have an excuse if counter claimed (though no one counter claiming as of now may cancel this theory). I'd suggest not claiming to him. I do agree that the other leaders (Veed and undisputed) should provide a role PM before expecting any claims as well.

As for today's lynch, theangryscientist's bandwagon sticks out as suspicious, but not enough to risk a team member for now.

Just thoughts that I had. :D
 
Yeah, why would there be more than one of the same game? There are multiple AC games; however, the character description is so generic it could apply to any of those games.

Furthermore:
If anybody allied with Nintendo dies by Night 3, you can PM Jigglypuffers42 with "Night 3- Absorb <User>". You will absorb <User> into your virtual world, allowing you to use his powers for the rest of the game, if any. If nobody allied with Nintendo has died by Night 3, you will be given the choice to use this power every subsequent odd night. This power is one-use only.
Click to expand...
Why is this restriction mentioned twice when only the first mention is needed?

My theory: Destiny is a Microsoft inspector who inspected the actual Animal Crossing. He modified the role of the original role PM and stuck in this part:
You know that there may be more Animal Crossings in this game. However, if they are present, they will not know of this.
Click to expand...
to justify multiple roles (come on, "they will not know of this" but you do?)

So, in conclusion, I propose lynching the potential Microsoft, Destiny Warrior, unless he has something to say in his defense.

EDIT: Forgot to vote. Lynch Destiny Warrior
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top