“Begging” is a pretty uncharitable way to describe this discussion, especially when I’ve mentioned several times across this thread that the goal of tweaking policy would not be to block rises or changes entirely. My own proposal even aims to keep rises. The whole point of having this PR thread now rather than the end of the Generation is so that we don’t have to have a last-minute fix policy that freezes rises altogether like in SS.
You’re right that it is very dismissive to enter a discussion of possible tiering modification and say “well if you don’t like it, play another tier”. It’s just as tone-deaf as entering a ban discussion or suspect thread and saying “well if you don’t like this element, play a different tier”. I actually have and still do play Ubers, non-lower tiers formats, and old gens that dont have tiering updates anymore, and they’re fun. I and many others tune into current gen tiering partly BECAUSE the metagames stay fresh with updates. That doesn’t mean these updates have to be majorly disruptive, which is the point of reform.
I already explained in my last post that just because rises can remove problematic Pokemon - a job that’s actually the responsibility of tiering councils - doesn’t mean they’re above reform, especially when they’re creating problems more than solving them. I recommend more closely reading other posts in this thread, especially ishtar’s.