Resource USM OU Checks Compendium

Status
Not open for further replies.
op adapted from rus / nus version
approved by the mod team


OU Checks Compendium
The main goal of this thread is to provide a visual tool to assist teambuilding by giving players a quick way to pick checks and counters for the metagame's top threats. Basically, a "check" as defined here is anything that reliably beats a threat, and they're separated in this list by whether or not they can switch in. The Pokemon will be listed by sprites rather than their names for the sake of easy and quick reference, and they will be organized in descending order of viability ranking. The community is encouraged to get involved and make suggestions as this project will have updates often to become as accurate as possible.

Here are a few guidelines that explain how this compendium will be organized (subject to change):
  • Only Pokemon ranked on the OU Viability Rankings between S and B- will be included to begin with, this is because most Pokemon under B- are too uncommon or require less specific preparation to deal with in comparison to higher ranked threats. This may change in the future, however.
  • Anything that drops down from B- will be kept on the compendium in case it rises up again, unless if it suffers a massive drop in viability it will be removed.
  • Checks are separated by guaranteed switch-ins (GSI), situational switch-ins (SSI), and non-switch-ins (NSI), in alphabetical order.
  • Only official Smogon Analysis sets are being considered here.
  • This was a very long process so we're subject to have made mistakes here and there, please feel free to make informed suggestions within reason.
  • Don't argue if something you've suggested is rejected.

Guaranteed Switch-Ins (GSI): These Pokemon can switch into basically anything a threat can throw at them and win the matchup, within reason. They may only be able to switch in safely one or two times, or they may only be able to switch in with certain sets, so that'll be up to the player's discretion. When evaluating which moves a check must be able to switch into, I'll only consider moves that (A) are included as main set slashes on a Pokemon's analysis page, or (B) are at least common enough to show up on a Pokemon's 1825 moveset statistics entry. Anything else will be considered niche or uncommon enough that a check won't have to worry about it too often.

Situational Switch-Ins (SSI): These Pokemon can switch in safely under certain circumstances, but not always. Pokemon in this category can either switch safely into some variants of a threat but struggle against others, or they struggle with common coverage moves but can at least switch into a threat's STABs and other moves commonly used on switches (such as boosting moves and Knock Off) and win the matchup. This is somewhat of a "gray area" category, so there's a bit of flexibility here.

Non-Switch-Ins (NSI): These Pokemon cannot switch safely into a certain threat, generally because they are beaten by one of the threat's STABs, lose if they switch in on a boosting move, etc. Pokemon in this category can, however, defeat a threat in a 1-on-1 matchup. This includes faster revenge killers, as well as Pokemon that can take a single hit and KO back.


There might be exceptions to the above rules, so these will be handled on a case-by-case basis. This compendium should give you a wide range of checks to choose from so that you can build until you feel you can cover what you need to between team synergy and in-game decision making. Don't get too caught up having a GSI for everything, because that's basically impossible. As long as you've got a good mixture of Pokemon that can allow you to play against anything somewhat well, you'll be fine, just use this resource as a guideline to push you in the right direction when building.

Remember to read the entire OP before posting!
 
S rank

GSI:

SSI:
(♂)
(♀)

NSI:


S- rank


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:

A+ rank


GSI:

SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:

A rank


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI


GSI:
SSI:
NSI

A- rank


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:


GSI:
SSI:
NSI:
 
Last edited:
don't do it via text---orda-y built an entire web interface for checks compendiums that lets you categorize by sets, which fixes a fundamental flaw of checks compendiums based on pokemon alone. for example, in a compendium with no specification of sets, greninja would be NSI for volcarona because of scarf rock slide, but simply listing greninja is misleading, since the only set that fits is scarf rock slide.

orda's site is here. i suggest talking to him to learn more about how it works but making a compendium is pretty simple (it's all generated from text). i already did a significant portion of the work a year ago, it just needs updating.

without specifying for sets in a compendium, they're functionally worthless. use orda's tool.
 
don't do it via text---orda-y built an entire web interface for checks compendiums that lets you categorize by sets, which fixes a fundamental flaw of checks compendiums based on pokemon alone. for example, in a compendium with no specification of sets, greninja would be NSI for volcarona because of scarf rock slide, but simply listing greninja is misleading, since the only set that fits is scarf rock slide.

orda's site is here. i suggest talking to him to learn more about how it works but making a compendium is pretty simple (it's all generated from text). i already did a significant portion of the work a year ago, it just needs updating.

without specifying for sets in a compendium, they're functionally worthless. use orda's tool.
isnt this like really outdated
 
did you read my post at all? i said the compendium itself (the text plugged into the site to generate the stuff you see) is outdated, but the site is literally built for this. you can make a checks compendium for any metagame you want, plug it into the data tab, rebuild the compendium, and you have a new one.

to further illustrate my point: what lando set are you even talking about? tapu bulu dies to SSSS, which can be ran on more defensively inclined landos or on fully offensive ones. its an inconsistent way to check all landorus---instead of just awkwardly sticking it in ssi because of SSSS or its lack of consistent recovery, just specify the set, so people that use the compendium can figure out what sets they're weak to.
 
did you read my post at all? i said the compendium itself (the text plugged into the site to generate the stuff you see) is outdated, but the site is literally built for this. you can make a checks compendium for any metagame you want, plug it into the data tab, rebuild the compendium, and you have a new one.

to further illustrate my point: what lando set are you even talking about? tapu bulu dies to SSSS, which can be ran on more defensively inclined landos or on fully offensive ones. its an inconsistent way to check all landorus---instead of just awkwardly sticking it in ssi because of SSSS or its lack of consistent recovery, just specify the set, so people that use the compendium can figure out what sets they're weak to.
Ye thx for suggestion contacted Orda-Y.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 0)

Top