• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

UUBD Format Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Howdy,

With regards to SS UU, I believe that very few people actually like this tier as is and for the rest it's simply tolerable with it's own fair issues. There's a few current meta defenders with valid arguments, but to not take this opportunity to try something new in a rather solved and stale meta would be a shame to pass up. Even if an official decision is not made on behalf of a tested mon at the end of the tour, there is no harm in experimenting with the tier for the duration of the tour. In addition to potentially freeing something(s) for this tour, I would like to propose a secondary option in being able to ban something(s) that is currently within the tier for the duration of the tour as a means to see what the tier is like without the presence/influence in question. This is something that could be applicable to the other UU tiers as well as something to consider. I'm not really in a position to discuss GSC UU in depth, but imagine a no Granbull/Scyther/Nidoqueen/etc. meta, a no Kangaskhan in ADV UU etc., no Primarima/Cobalion/etc. lol, legit any other tier could apply this if that's of interest to the masses.

Anyways, as far as SS tiering goes, I believe there's I think there's two routes that could be taken that revolve around Primarina. This mon is one of the more centralizing things in the tier, with fair arguments on both sides for and against this mon in the tier. That being said, I feel like things that could be freed from UUBL vary a ton depending on whether this mon exists or not within the tier. When SS was current generation, the bans of Mienshao/Kommo-o/Moltres-galar/Aegislash really put the final nail in the coffin leading to Prima's dominance within the tier. Not to say that Prima wasn't good into these mons, but these were all mons that could threaten it in some way that could be argued to have been healthy interactions on the basis of Prima's influence alone. I believe that in the current meta Prima just has way too much freedom in that very few things can actually pressure it, on top of just having the set versatility to bypass every one of its checks (even just Scald burns making bulky grasses set up fodder or losing regardless to Calm Mind if they lack physical coverage to hit it) outside of very niche mons that aren't UU by usage in Articuno and Mantine. Ideally, any mons up for consideration to be freed from UUBL should be to counteract this dynamic in some way if we're looking at taking the route to preserve Primarina in the tier. The alternative route would be to ban Primarina to make team building easier and going from there as to what should be freed from UUBL. A third option would be to see the tier with the end-of-gen would-be shifts without the tier lock so the uu tier without Rotom-wash/Excadrill/Crawdaunt/Gastrodon/Blaziken. I'm curious as to what others think about these routes, but as far as UUBL drops within the current tier goes I think it's tough to imagine freeing any one mon by itself, but it would be the safest thing to do test wise if changing the tier is agreed upon at some point. My quick thoughts on the UUBLs:

:aegislash:
Aegislash: I was a fan of Aegislash's centralization in the tier but the sentiment against it is understandable, although I do believe the addition of this mon could allow for additional things to be freed without as much worry, but this is a pretty drastic change that isn't too far away from what current gen ss players may have experienced so perhaps it would be better to consider things that were banned at an earlier time.

:alakazam:
Alakazam: Absolutely not lol this mon just shreds everything and I recall that it could very easily EV for most priority hits as well without missing out on too much power so I can't see this being a healthy addition.

:arctozolt:
Arctozolt: This is the mon that I believe has a real basis for a retest out of all the BLs. This mon was deemed too much at a time when Alolan-Ninetales was in the tier and Ninetales undeniably offered a lot for the hail playstyle in combination with Arctozolt, but since Ninetales currently resides in OU I think it could be worth giving this mon another chance. The hail playstyle in the current tier would rely on Vanilluxe/Aurorus/Abomasnow, so it is a weird nerf in a way to not have Ninetales but could still very well have potential to be a legit playstyle. Arctozolt only really needed its stabs to function, so it has some solid options for the last two move slots that could be of some concern on top of being able to set its own hail without a dedicated setter as well.

:blaziken:
Blaziken: This mon was interesting in the time it was allowed in UU in that there was counterplay options to it, but would definitely still be borderline. The appeal to freeing this would be that it is something that would play into the Prima dynamic, but I remember one of the arguments for banning this mon was that it could essentially pick its checks, so I feel like it would kinda do a lot of what Prima already does so if this mon ever got freed it would likely need to be freed with something alongside it like Latias maybe.

:dracozolt:
Dracozolt: This mon required very specific answers and resists most of the tiers priority methods outside of Zydog as well, so probably not a good presence.

:gengar:
Gengar: Could be interesting to test, but seems borderline just based on the wicked movepool and offensive stats it has on paper. However, this mon is on the more frail side and 110 speed is good, but falls within the awkward range for SS speedtier standards so maybe in practice it's fine?

:hawlucha:
Hawlucha: This mon would boost terrain playstyles, but definitely has the means to exist independently. I think this is another case of a mon that probably can't be freed alone or just depends too much on what else is freed.

:kommo-o:
Kommo-o: I actually was very fond of this mon while it was in the tier, but it undeniably has great set versatility. I'd be fond of giving this mon another chance since it did have legit means of counterplay, just scouting it was the difficult aspect about it, but I know this is a minority opinion so I can't see this being freed unless maybe Aegislash and perhaps something else existed alongside it.

:latios:
Latios: Nah bro, the tier could barely handle Latias, we dont need an even stronger version of it around.

:latias:
Latias: This was an interesting mon during its time in UU. I think in an alternate reality this mon could have stayed in the tier and been fine maybe, but I am a lot more skeptical of it without Aegislash and Goltres around. I remember scouting its set was somewhat challenging since its set versatility was very good, but could be adapted to perhaps. I'd be inclined to give this a chance ultimately.

:mienshao:
Mienshao: This mon was just way too good at what it did in outlasting its checks to where it's probably still unhealthy. This mon did have some neat set options in Scarf and even Assault Vest though, but I think the negatives outweigh the positives here.

:moltres-galar:
Moltres-galar: This was the coinflip mon as some like to call it based on whether it could flinch or not, but did occasionally have difficulty setting up. How quickly this mon can boost is not to be underestimated though considering Berserk, and it also had no issue pulling off mono coverage + rest sets as well with its decent bulk. This is a mon that could play into the Prima dynamic, but it's probably better to stay gone unless Aegislash is ever freed again.

:terrakion:
Terrakion: Another negatives outweighing the positives situation and just has a lot going for it.

:thundurus:
Thundy-I: Originally, I was an advocate in pushing for its ban in cg SS and am still very much skeptical about a faster Thundy-t being in the tier, like Thundy-t is already kinda the unwallable and is very good at generating momentum, Thundy-I having the speed tier bonus is still very much a scary thought. It was very good at punishing slower structures with how unblockable Knock Off on it was and could outlast its checks. The pivot set utilized Defiant often and could easily rack up significant chip into Salamence/Krookodile structures and Defogs, and I remember pivot and Nasty Plot sets had very different checks from each other. This mon would be interesting to see in the modern meta though, but I'm inclined to believe it might still be too much, but seems like a worthy test candidate overall.

:zapdos-galar:
Zapdos-galar: Decently strong with epic stabs, Choiced sets seem like the most optimal things on it so the speed tier may be one thing to hold it back and it could be argued that locking into a stab move could be punishable on top of wearing itself down with Brave Bird if it wants to do any real damage and Rocky Helmet is common enough to where thru priority it could end up being okayish in practice. This mon isn't exactly frail though. Maybe could be worth looking at in the future at some point or if Aegislash is ever freed, might be a worthy test candidate overall.

In my eyes to address the Prima dynamic if the goal was to preserve it, the ideal UUBL drops would be Aegislash + one of the fighting types, but well Aegislash kinda would open the door to more options that may or may not be welcome, so to ever free this mon again we would have to be accepting of drastic changes in the tier and follow it thru, which could be its own discussion at some point. Realistically, Arctozolt seems like the most plausible thing without too many potential consequences, but above all this form of testing just revolves around how much were looking to explore in the tier at this time.

Again, anything that is selected to be freed doesn't have to be final at the end of the tour, so if we can explore something at this time we very much should imo. I think in general this sort of medium to explore options of the sort should exist in some way. I encourage players of the non-mentioned UU tiers to also consider taking this opportunity for this kind of experimenting even just for science.

Thanks for reading and would love to hear yalls thoughts on this! :]
 
I don't usually take part on format discussions but i felt like i should be saying something

I really really really believe adv shouldn't consider any other unban or test in the near future, it was already a ballsy move to take what felt like years to test all the potential uubls that would fit nicely into uu and i think the tier just achieved that to good success, nothing else would add any positive to the tier without looking stupid imo. Kadabra had been tested before and even though I did not play the test it just seems to hurt the tier more often than help, the speed tier shouldn't be a reason to have a motivation to push for the mons test this tour since its offensive profile is honestly toxic, Kanga checks it but not that well and everything else is p much weak to Psychic on top of forcing mons that you wouldnt like to fit on teams often. This had been the sentiment of most of the players during its test and idk why it would change now. UUFPL already did a great job at showcasing the tier with bls and i think that is enough. Also as BFM said even though it is a less serious tour than UUPL it is still an official one so tests should be agreed upon longer discussions and giving the vanilla tier the playtime intended is essential.

Also let the UUbers guys have fun since they dont have UUPL for that
 
its ok for tiers to be boring for some people. I was at one point a major ss hater but i think after watching uupl I realized that it has its good and bad sides like any metagame, and to call it stale is not even that true.
I dont think any ss unbans add much besides maybe a gengar trick being a healthy dynamic in the face of bulkier stuff, but who knows if choiced would even be the good set. regardless, i dont think there is much reason to unban things in ss uu.

I would also like to echo what other people have said about not changing adv. i helped test and build adv this uufpl a fair bit, and it was fun, but I dont think any of the mons would make actual adv uu better.

As for the last slot, I support a 4th SV. I understand arguments that it might be lower quality or that signups won't be super high for this, but consider that this tour will come on the heels of uufpl where many new players showed their stuff, and I would like to think that this would be a fun way for people who succeeded there to try on a bigger stage.
 
final thoughts from me:

Re: SS Drops
I really don't understand the push for a Thundurus-I test here, and after talking about it on Discord it seems nobody is actually seriously considering a vote anyways? If that's the case, then I think it's just a waste of time to drop it for UUBD, and I don't even think it's going to positively influence anything. The fact that you would be releasing a Thundy-T that now outspeeds most of its previous "checks" just seems silly to me to argue that this is going to move the tier in a positive direction. Most of the positives that Thundy-I brings are already in the tier with Thundy-T, with the exception that Thundy-T is easier to check (which is a good thing!). I am totally against a stand-alone drop of Thundy-I. I do believe it could be dropped in tandem with some other mons, and I think an SS UU tier with Thundy-I + Latias + Aegislash + Terrakion freed could potentailly create a new dynamic for the tier that is possibly better than the current dynamic, but just adding Thundy-I alone doesn't make any sense.

The only SS UUBL stand-alone drop that makes sense is Arctozolt. This isn't because it's "good" for the tier, but rather because Ninetales-A rose to OU at the end of SS so there are actual legitimate changed circumstances since the Arctozolt ban and it seems fair to give it a test. Doesn't mean we have to unban it afterwards, but there is solid reasoning to justify a retest in the tier as a standalone mon. Can you just use Vanilluxe instead of A-Tales and still do the same thing? Well, maybe, but maybe it at least deserves a chance to see if it still has the same kind of effect since we never actually saw that dynamic before and when it was banned it was always used alongside A-Tales. All of the other ideas of dropping other UUBLs are just rooted in experimental logic re: how to "positively" change the tier which, to me, is fine if you want to go run an unofficial Thundy-I + Latias SS UU side tour. But let's not do that for UUBD, especially if we're not considering voting anyways.

So in summary: if we test anything, :Arctozolt: Arctozolt is the only thing that makes sense to officially test given the changed circumstances. If anyone wants other changes to try to see how it affects the tier, run some test games with it or petition for/host a side tour with it and see how it goes.


Re: GSC
Let's not do anything with GSC right now please. We just dropped Aero and Muk and the meta is, in my opinion, developing in an extremely positive direction following those drops. It needs more time to develop before we should consider any other changes. Don't drop anything else, and don't ban Scyther or BP - just keep it all the same and see how it continues to develop positively. That doesn't mean we can't change stuff later - I disagree with the notion that there was some sort of agreement to not drop anything else ever - but for right now it's pretty clear that we shouldn't be touching it and should just let it continue to play out as it's only really had one tour to do so since the unbans.
 
For last slot I think uubers is a cool shout and could probably try a slot here, it's not UUPL and this tour already has more formats with rby + possible inclusion of another one that isn't in PL, so even if it's just a test run and it's still on the chopping block afterwards I think it's not a bad idea to try it for inclusivity. The playerbase is new but really active and enjoys their tier a lot, and in uufpl tour players were starting in the slot and doing fine as well. If it's not getting in I think the bo3 hate in uu is insane, it's the hype slot of any tour let it in. 3 SV is plenty I think 4 just makes the pools more diluted and is too many SV UU games. uubers > bo3 >> SV 4.
 
Hello UU, the UU tournament planning team thanks you all so much for the many well written posts in this thread. After some important discussion, we have reached a conclusion on what to allow this coming UUBD. In terms of UUBLs, there will be no retests at all for any tier in UUBD, meaning each tier will be kept as is coming into the tour. We have been informed that the overwhelming majority of the playerbase of these tiers would prefer to keep the tiers the same and let the metagames develop on their own before exploring other avenues if they later decide to. In terms of the final tier, we have decided to select SV4 as the last option. Bo3 was unanimously shut down as a whole, and while UUbers certainly has promise, we felt it would be too early to include it in a more mainstream tour with it just starting to develop a connection to mainstream UU. Quality games still can come out of SV4 and it gives several players the chance to start in a higher stakes tour environment that they wouldn't have gotten otherwise. Still, there's a very possible future that UUbers can be featured down the line in next year's blind draft (should this one prove to be successful), so not all is lost. This thread will now be locked. We hope to see you very soon for manager and player signups on June 17th!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top