I wasn't gonna respond to this stuff earlier because I figured it just wasn't worth and what we said in uucord was enough discussion from our team, but posts like this feel disingenuous and imply a lot of negative things about our team. To call us out for "taking spots" from uu players both implies that our players didn't deserve to get in, and that things would be inherently better with said uu players getting in. I think this is completely untrue, and if someone were to be able to make such a big impact on a team one of the other 7 teams would have also sought out for them, instead of the blame just falling on us for people who didn't get drafted anywhere to stay undrafted. We picked people we have full faith can win for our cheaper buys, and weren't even the only ones with as many 3k's as we had, with other teams matching our number, so other teams coulda bought other people left out as well. I've teamed with almost everyone on our roster before and fully believe in them to put up wins.I feel like some people are missing the original point. They didn’t just get unlucky that other people were chosen, they got unlucky cause a managing team prioritized their group of non-mains and made the ENTIRE TEAM out of it, practically wasting slots of what is supposed to be a UU-centered tour. Now if they go on and win, okay I’ll eat my hat who cares, they’re good players. But there is something to be said about something like this happening and what it means for the spirit of the tier if the tier’s active playerbase is overlooked for an ENTIRE TEAM OF UBERS PLAYERS! This should be happening in tiers with smaller active player bases like CAP, not UU.
We started the draft dropping almost 70k between myself, pdt, and garay, so it's natural we didn't have much money to go around by the end of it. I'm no stranger to drafting tour players / clickers in pl's, I even have a reputation of doing so in my own tiers pl's like ubers and ag. I don't see these subforum tours as something mainers have "priority" or anything over which is why even in my own sections I'm willing to buy a lot of tour players and non mainers, this is a competition and we are looking to win the tournament. I trust myself, fragments, and our big buys to be able to work very effectively alongside our cheaper picks to produce wins and prep well, and I see nothing wrong with this drafting strategy. Jerk teams exist everywhere in almost every PL as do "nepo buys" on other teams, and we felt buying people we're good friends with who are proven to be very strong overall players across multiple high level tournaments was the strategy to go for with how we can support and work together.
To call this wasting slots is an insult to our team and not even beneficial to uu as a whole. We made a genuine draft we think can win this tournament with our slots we picked, and we're bringing in players who were genuinely enthusiastic about playing this tournament from other sections, who may be interested in uu more in the future to grow the section. And again, 7 other teams had full opportunities to buy the players mentioned that went undrafted yet didn't, so I don't see how one team focusing harder on tour players given that we spent so much on flexible gen players who can support well is any issue.
The strikers will be giving our all this season. We didn't sign up just to mess around in a random tier, we signed up to win. I can ensure that at the very least our full effort will be put through in this tournament, and we will look to do even better than how close we came last year with a win this year.
Last edited: