Why is everyone saying Gen V is broken!?

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is my first ever post so don't complain..
Anyways I just wanted to say WHY does everybody think all the new pokemon, moves and abilities are 'broken'??

Most common examples:

Zoroark with Illusion ability.
571.png

Shandeera with Shadow Tag ability.
609.png

Urgamoth with Butterfly Dance move and his statspread.
637.png

Randorosu with Micheavious Heart ability.
645.png

Ononokusu 147 base attack!
612.png


Politoed and Ninetales with Drizzle and Drought abilities.
038.png
186.png

Other classic examples of apparently 'broken' pokemon!

553.png
534.png
530.png

Warubiru --- Roopushin ----------- Doryuuzu
Encourage -His movepool/abilities --Sand Throw


People only say things like these are broken because they are not used to these new toys yet!! Apparently smogon will ban dream world abilities (FAIL!!) also so if this is true then i guess nobody is ready for change!!

WHO AGREES WITH ME?
And if you don't agree with me then it is simply because your not smart enough to deal with change, new toys or find a counter.
 
Cool story bro.

"WHO AGREES WITH ME?
And if you don't agree with me then it is simply because your not smart enough to deal with change, new toys or find a counter."

Can't argue with that logic, can we?

Who said Warubiaru and Roopushin were broken? The former has overconfidence and Warubiru is the first stage evo btw, and the latter is just LOL. Doryuuzu is pretty strong though and his ability does make him seem potentially reaallllyyy powerful.
And where'd you hear that Smogon will ban dream world abilities? And on a more important note, who even uses the world "fail" anymore?
 
This thread is fairly ill-informed (especially re. Dream World abilities) and furthermore it's just going to engender discussion over whether things are broken or not, since... that's what it's about. Please see the rules. I feel that the OP has been too hasty in drawing conclusions when it's very early on and has gotten unnecessarily personal about intelligence -- how is that even meant to foster intelligent discussion? As such, I am going to lock this, with a note to those who replied mockingly to post more constructively.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top