Since pulsar "allegedly" has a roleclaim that can be proved, ##vote dead by daylight
^Right here.
unless celever just didn't update my DMs, i still have the "forgot" message, i don't know what you want me to tell youSince pulsar "allegedly" has a roleclaim that can be proved, ##vote dead by daylight
So we have basically a 50/50 (or higher) on Tommy/Bliz and a role cop that refuses to role cop, and DBD is your vote? Good thing you're conf town lmaoSince pulsar "allegedly" has a roleclaim that can be proved, ##vote dead by daylight
AirC can you please engage with this post:So we have basically a 50/50 (or higher) on Tommy/Bliz and a role cop that refuses to role cop, and DBD is your vote? Good thing you're conf town lmao
I don't really want to refute this because there's a decent chance Tommy gets lynched today and flips scum, but like in the interest of logic (and eventual self preservation if Tommy is town) let me lay this out
0. Suppose Tommy and I are both town
1. Tommy and I get linked and scum know this is still true overnight
2. Scum kill Peum (no more threat of one of them getting love red)
3. Today scum push the Tommy Bliz 1v1 theory -- "one of them must be scum"
4. We lynch me or Tommy. Whoops, it's a town flip!
5. Tomorrow, we lynch the other one. Oh no, it's town again and now mafia win!
I think mafia could have made this plan so I'm not 100% that Tommy is scum
I mean I kinda agree with you but it's hard to prove you're right. We kinda need to consider that maf could also be afraid of potential protection if they exist as town. But unless more claims come forward it's hard to actually confirm what you said and especially since it's the biggest lead we got right nowAirC can you please engage with this post:
I'd like to keep the convo going but I'm completely fried and it's 2am and I'm not thinking well enough, I'll reread that tomorrowI don't really understand what you're saying; we will never be able to confirm what mafia was thinking when they chose a specific night kill, that's an inherent part of the game and why night kill analysis often leads to these kinds of scenarios where we're forced to consider "did scum do this thing because it's optimal for them, or did they do it because it's suboptimal, so that they could later claim in thread that it must have been optimal?"
Quoted for grammarI don't really understand what you're saying. We will never be able to confirm what mafia was thinking when they chose a specific night kill, that's an inherent part of the game. This is why night kill analysis often leads to these kinds of scenarios where we're forced to consider, "did scum do this thing because it's optimal for them? Or did they do it because it's suboptimal, so that they could later claim in thread that it must have been optimal?"
in a few hours*guys if i come into thread claiming to be mafia that is NOT me that is evil psy who has had a few glasses of vodka
man i was reading through half-sentient and then went "wait who brought up the crackpot double town lovers theory they're for sure town" but it's just someone in the lovers tie trying to self-pres damnI don't really want to refute this because there's a decent chance Tommy gets lynched today and flips scum, but like in the interest of logic (and eventual self preservation if Tommy is town) let me lay this out
0. Suppose Tommy and I are both town
1. Tommy and I get linked and scum know this is still true overnight
2. Scum kill Peum (no more threat of one of them getting love red)
3. Today scum push the Tommy Bliz 1v1 theory -- "one of them must be scum"
4. We lynch me or Tommy. Whoops, it's a town flip!
5. Tomorrow, we lynch the other one. Oh no, it's town again and now mafia win!
I think mafia could have made this plan so I'm not 100% that Tommy is scum
drop what youd like to say and i will get back to it!psy would love to chat w/ you when we both have functioning minds