From the position its in, it looks more like a Rock pokemons face. Like a mix of Onix and Geodude's faces. But smaller. Maybe its the position. Reshiram looks nothing like a dragon and more like a Winged Fox.
She isn't voicing Zekrom, she is voicing a character in the Zoroark movie that is a Magnemite fangirl and loves electric types.I'm starting to think that Shoko is actually mistaken. I mean, Zekrom is a scary, mighty god of destruction, why it would be voiced by a waoman? It would make a LOT more sense if Reshi was Dragon/Electric and if Shoko was voicing him o-o.
Which would be kind of the point--it's not a role that she'd be likely to get, but one that she'd love to do because it's a legendary Electric-type, hence her wishing that she could somehow get it. Either way though, ti doesn't really matter, as whether the bit about it being an Electric-type is true or not has nothing to do with the gender (if any) it would be portrayed as being.I'm starting to think that Shoko is actually mistaken. I mean, Zekrom is a scary, mighty god of destruction, why it would be voiced by a waoman? It would make a LOT more sense if Reshi was Dragon/Electric and if Shoko was voicing him o-o.
Yeah, the only thing voicing the legendarys are trash compacters and recycled godzilla clips (palkia) or meta ridley (dialga).She isn't voicing Zekrom, she is voicing a character in the Zoroark movie that is a Magnemite fangirl and loves electric types.
I agree, the gender differences thus far are just incredibly lazy. The vast majority of Pokemon don't have ANY difference, and the ones that do are so subtle, you'll probably miss them anyway! Ex: Scyther/Scizor's abdomen is about 3 pixels longer in female form... wow!!!on a side note, i wish the pokemons had more differences on sprite depending on the gender, stuff like blaziken only get a small little fur difference, i want a somewhat bigger change, something that give the impression its really male/female, or at least bigger fur differences, and some pokemons like lucario dont even get any change in sprite, wtf?
I agree the differences are pointless. I think they just wanted to add it in for the mascot pokes such as pikachu and then made small differences to all the others because they had to.if animals are the same then what is the damn point of changing the sprites at all? they added small, pathetic little changes and expect everyone to notice, or they keep all the sprites the same thing or make changes that are significant enough.
Obviously, you haven't seen Primal's art thread. If the mere thought made you "roflmao"... well, I want to see your reaction to this!Roflmao at the thought a a female machamp.
I also thought Normal and Dark along with their Dragon Type when I took a closer look.In my mind, I'm going to say that Zekrom is Dragon/Dark and Reshiram is Dragon/Normal.
Just my thoughts. I'm going with colors, haha. Hey, they're two new type combinations, why not?
It serves the purpose of aesthetic touch, not some elaborate feature that the game revolves around. In general, animal species do have subtle appearance differences between genders such as color, size, and ornamentation. And what do you know? Those are the gender differences in Pokemon!if animals are the same then what is the damn point of changing the sprites at all? they added small, pathetic little changes and expect everyone to notice, or they keep all the sprites the same thing or make changes that are significant enough.
It sure looks like they did, doesn't it? Still, I'm going to remain hopeful. Maybe they added an option to turn the following Pokemon thing off manually (although I can't imagine why, since everyone loved it) or maybe they're just hiding the sprites in the beta footage so we can't see what any of the new Pokemon look like.I just realized that there wasn't a single Pokemon following the trainer in that footage. Did they remove the best feature of HGSS?!
Good point. I'd like to think the reason they'd hide the starters on purpose is because they have some awesome new effect they don't want us to know about. Maybe the Pokemon don't follow straight behind you, but spread out like in the Ranger games and take their own paths. I'd personally like that. Always having your Pokemon right behind you in HGSS got a little claustrophobic sometimes. It was fine for the smaller models, but when you bring out to the big guys like Tar or Gyarados, their sprites fade into the back of your head when you stand still. Not a big deal, it looks a little bit awkward.one reason to make it optional could be because you can let any Pokemon in your party follow you, regardless of position. that would probably necessitate the option to choose that no Pokemon follow you. However, they could easily just use one of the starters of they wanted to show partner Pokemon, so I'm a little worried. :(
one reason to make it optional could be because you can let any Pokemon in your party follow you, regardless of position. that would probably necessitate the option to choose that no Pokemon follow you. However, they could easily just use one of the starters of they wanted to show partner Pokemon, so I'm a little worried. :(It sure looks like they did, doesn't it? Still, I'm going to remain hopeful. Maybe they added an option to turn the following Pokemon thing off manually (although I can't imagine why, since everyone loved it) or maybe they're just hiding the sprites in the beta footage so we can't see what any of the new Pokemon look like.
that's true. now that I think about it, HG/SS was a remake, meaning the game was pretty much already "made". they just needed to redo the graphics, music, add a bunch of new stuff, etc; it's a lot less work then making a new game from scratch. they probably put partners in because they had time/wanted to add as much new stuff as they could. having to make updated sprites for old and new Pokemon may be too much work to consider, since honestly, not having partner Pokemon doesn't ruin the game in any way.Or they could even have shown something like Pikachu. Really, there's no reason they couldn't have shown the Pokemon following you unless it's either not in the game or they somehow haven't gotten around to putting it in the game. I have a feeling that it's not going to be in BW and I'm not basically thinking that so if it does appear, I'll be happy.
Or they could even have shown something like Pikachu. Really, there's no reason they couldn't have shown the Pokemon following you unless it's either not in the game or they somehow haven't gotten around to putting it in the game. I have a feeling that it's not going to be in BW and I'm not basically thinking that so if it does appear, I'll be happy.one reason to make it optional could be because you can let any Pokemon in your party follow you, regardless of position. that would probably necessitate the option to choose that no Pokemon follow you. However, they could easily just use one of the starters of they wanted to show partner Pokemon, so I'm a little worried. :(
In real life some animals don't show any sexual dimorphisism. Some show moderate amounts of sexual dimorphism, and some show a large amount.if animals are the same then what is the damn point of changing the sprites at all? they added small, pathetic little changes and expect everyone to notice, or they keep all the sprites the same thing or make changes that are significant enough.
Actually, that's a solid idea, and something else just occured to me. We've seen gameplay in which the main character is walking through the city, but has no Pokemon in tow; so the natural assumption is that the feature won't appear in B/W. But this might be due to the fact that Huin City is that "Pallet Town" of B/W, the beginning town where you start out. This would explain why they have no Pokemon, because they've yet to leave town and therefore haven't met Prof.Oak / don't need a Pokemon with them for protection yet.Also remember that what we've seen the most of is Hiun City. The rotating 3D view and bustling crowds could necessitate putting one's Pokemon away while you're there.