i mean i cant speak for others, but me personally, i try to avoid the special set as much as possible because your main offensive stab being focus blast sucks :/ some mons like meloetta use it as useful coverage, but its not the same because giga and coverage for virizon are far weaker and you can't really avoid focus blast a lot of the time. i get sometimes this cant be avoided and mons can still be good with a low acc main stab (tornt in ou comes to mind especially), but virizon has a perfectly good physical set as well that doesnt rely on any low accuracy moves besides an occasional stone edge.![]()
Much like Delphox, Virizion appreciates having one less thing to worry about revenge killing it. Virizion wasn't exactly bad or underrated during the Durant meta, but it certainly appreciates not having to deal with a powerful wallbreaker that also revenge kills it naturally. I'm surprised Calm Mind sets aren't as common with Pursuit being so useful right now, but maybe that'll change. (SD is still better)
Tyrantrum and Mega Sableye got suspected and not banned also the thing about Durant was that it could outspeed all of its checks if it wanted to with scarf. another thing that was so deadly. Durant had 1 true switch which was Rotom-Fan which isn't the best. Also the statement about the steels walling 75% of the tier is pretty innacurate as a lot of Pokemon could use Substitute on incoming status effects and Mega Steelix is weak to a plentiful amount of things like Fighting and Water-types.gee, another suspected mon ended up getting banned, how shocking. these suspect tests are just formalities at this point, has anything suspected actually avoided a ban? although some bans were probably deserving, this pseudo auto ban is kind of ridiculous IMO. how do we define what's even ban worth anymore? something like Durant, who had switchins, plenty of checks/revenge killers, no priority, and was extremely set dependent gets the near unanimous boot. meanwhile shit like hitmonlee, medicham, exploud decimate half the tier with resisted moves and remain "unsuspected". the council or w/e smogon calls it now has great ability to shape the metagame in the tier by cherrypicking suspected mons, not an inherent problem, but one that can become a problem if the hivemind just keeps banning everything. lets keep banning every half competent offensive mon because "es too stonk" and see what happens. meanwhile the tier has good regen mons up the ass, and shit like mega Lix, mega Dino, bronzong and Reginazi which effortlessly walls like 3/4 of the tier. none of which will likely get suspected. stall is the future, and if you enjoy playing stall, then hell, lets keep banning everything. but if you shudder at the thought of elongated 6v6 drudging fuckfests, perhaps it is time to break from the status quo of suspecting = instantaneous banning.
gee, another suspected mon ended up getting banned, how shocking. these suspect tests are just formalities at this point, has anything suspected actually avoided a ban? although some bans were probably deserving, this pseudo auto ban is kind of ridiculous IMO. how do we define what's even ban worth anymore? something like Durant, who had switchins, plenty of checks/revenge killers, no priority, and was extremely set dependent gets the near unanimous boot. meanwhile shit like hitmonlee, medicham, exploud decimate half the tier with resisted moves and remain "unsuspected". the council or w/e smogon calls it now has great ability to shape the metagame in the tier by cherrypicking suspected mons, not an inherent problem, but one that can become a problem if the hivemind just keeps banning everything. lets keep banning every half competent offensive mon because "es too stonk" and see what happens. meanwhile the tier has good regen mons up the ass, and shit like mega Lix, mega Dino, bronzong and Reginazi which effortlessly walls like 3/4 of the tier. none of which will likely get suspected. stall is the future, and if you enjoy playing stall, then hell, lets keep banning everything. but if you shudder at the thought of elongated 6v6 drudging fuckfests, perhaps it is time to break from the status quo of suspecting = instantaneous banning.
hey hitman
i'm a stall player and stall is garbage in this tier right now. call me back when the hoopa exploud sigilyph emboar jellicent quintuple suspect test is going on and i might concede you have a point though
anyhow hate to break it to you but you are totally wrong, to the point where everyone is treating your post as a meme. by the way this post is also a call for people to stop doing that because it was fun for like an hour but.
Durant was one of the tier's most potent wallbreakers and it could revenge kill shit like virizion lol
Also the fact that it got banned out of a 80% majority doesn't mean that "smogon is ban happy" it just meant that 80% of voters, who are competent enough to get reqs within the games limit thought durant to be broken, the fact that most suspects get banned is probably a sign that we have a lot of potentially broken stuff in the metagame, which very much used to be the case. Everyone likes their free wins, i get it, that's why tyrantrum wasn't banned, but come on now.
Also not having to run hp fire on special glalie sounds amazing tbh, scarf dino is probably the best its ever been as well
As much as I hate missing, Special Virizion is really cool right now because it really pressures Lix much harder than Lum SD (and LO SD gets burned 100% of the time, that's just a fact), sets up easily on Diancie/Mola cores, does a lot better versus Sigilyph+Venusaur cores attempts at walling Virizion since you just need a little chip damage on sigilyph.i mean i cant speak for others, but me personally, i try to avoid the special set as much as possible because your main offensive stab being focus blast sucks :/ some mons like meloetta use it as useful coverage, but its not the same because giga and coverage for virizon are far weaker and you can't really avoid focus blast a lot of the time. i get sometimes this cant be avoided and mons can still be good with a low acc main stab (tornt in ou comes to mind especially), but virizon has a perfectly good physical set as well that doesnt rely on any low accuracy moves besides an occasional stone edge.
Not sure if you actually think this is why people voted no ban on Tyrantrum but its a little ridiculous and a lot insulting to the 48 (49 if you count the fact scythe. was gonna vote no ban but missed the vote) people who didn't vote ban on Tyrantrum. This thought wouldn't even make logical sense because even if Tyrantrum were giving "free wins" (come on, lol), your opponent is equally capable of using it thus giving you "free losses". 49 and I were talking about Tyrantrum like 3 weeks ago, and he was able to much more succinctly sum up my thoughts on why I didn't end up voting ban on Tyrantrum, and without digging through 3 weeks of skype logs it essentially boils down to, that while Tyrantrum is a very powerful Pokemon, and good in the RU metagame, it doesn't exactly generate or capitalize on free turns to an unhealthy degree, and many facets of the meta game mean that you'll often be preparing for Tyrantrum without trying to. This isn't a super great explanation, 49 definitely said it better. Aside from this, lets assume that "people love free wins" wasn't a logically flawed premise because anyone can use that mon, meaning it would hypothetically also cause "free losses". It actually appears that people really don't love "free wins" and that "free wins" are hardly representative of whats happening based on the fact that Tyrantrum had 11 uses in 48 games in SPL (11.5% usage) and went 6-5. I'm not gonna pretend that 48 games is a highly accurate representation of the RU meta game, but in the 1630 stats apparently only 14.1% of people actually like their "free wins". Before you respond "usage stats don't mean anything about whether or not a pokemon is broken," I agree, but if you agree with that you are fundamentally disagreeing with your own statement that Tyrantrum was banned because people want "free wins". So yeah, lets cut that kind of shit in these kind of threads moving forward, as it is at best a misguided view on opposing beliefs about tiering (which is at the end of the day subjective), and at worst a malicious attempt to label anyone who disagrees with your opinion as "seeking free wins" or "cheap". You would never catch me saying people who voted ban need to "get good" and stop losing to Tyrantrum, because I don't think people that voted ban on Tyrantrum did so because they are unable to beat it, and I'm not about to imply that.Everyone likes their free wins, i get it, that's why tyrantrum wasn't banned, but come on now.