I have a job and school fyi.. you just don't get to complain about inactivity while laying cover for yourself to be inactive. I didn't say you're leading the village, I said 'pseudo' quite clearly so I'd really rather you didn't misrepresent my thought, i.e. that it represents doing something useful and supportive to the town that it isn't. That being said I've seen this happen to you repeatedly and I'd rather it not drag your game down over and over so I will take your word for it you are keeping notes and hope you post those observations. It would be better if you could post observations as they happen where you do not feel there is a good reason to keep them down, because observations like 'that post seemed scummy' are important for thread direction and introduce pressure.
Where are you getting off at? I'm wasn't complaining about inactivity 20 minutes after the game was created. I'm also not laying cover for myself to be inactive. I'm quite active and will remain active. A 7 hour absence doesn't constitute as being inactive in my book. If I'm away for 24 hours, call me inactive. If I'm missing deadlines or actions, call me inactive. Between my post at 1:16 and when I went to work at 4:00, there was nothing meaningful in the thread. There are no intentions to psuedo lead the village. It's not me doing something at the beginning and then fading into obscurity for the rest of the cycle. You're reaching for straws when there are no straws to be reached for.
Please clarify this "happen to me repeatedly" thing? And how are you "dragging my game down over and over" when again, you're throwing out ridiculous accusations hours into a game that's yet to really begin? What are you even getting at? What is this "activity argument I get into every time"? Don't hide behind trying to be a nice guy. If you're calling me out on something that you find to be important to the game, follow up on it. The goal is to win the game, not to be a sweetheart.
My notes are my thoughts. I'll share them when they become important. But hey, they're not important right now because it's day one. If something seems fishy, I'm going to sit on and try to expand on it. If someone does something that's a little off, I'm not going to test them by telling them what they're doing is a little off. That makes them self conscious and changes their behavior. Gets me nowhere. If king sat back on the Blazeade + DLE + Ullar thing, maybe he builds a case on more evidence. Now it's just an unsubstantiated guess to the rest of us unless he has night actions to back that up. I'll answer people when they ask me questions. I'll give reads when I feel somethings going on and I'm prodding people. But for the limited hunches and notes I did write down, I'll share them when they actually do something in the game or when other people bring them up.
---
If you want a read, how about a quick read on you. You're comically aggressive. You've went after me for doing nothing and then "disappearing" when the only thing you did was make a joke response in the direction of Jalmont, call me out for "pseudo leading without follow up", and then left without doing anything. It seems to me that for someone so stuck on pressing for people to "do something" that you would actually do more. And what have you done really?
You've bandwagoned on Jalmont and Blazeade without adding anything to their argument or by explaining why you think they're correct. No reason. Are they correct on everything? Are you in support of what of their thoughts? Why do you support them? Your posts are hollow and your reads are busywork. They're nothing. You do them to look like you're doing something when you're not... you just want to point to something to say you did something when someone asks.
You say that mafia is afraid to piss people off early game, but you back off from something you deem relevant about my gameplay because you want me to have "a nice game." Did you scum slip with this and just tell us all your reasoning on accident? Because it seems to me that you just said a mafia would do something and proceeded to do it.
You also did the same thing to Dullagamur. Called him out for asking for info and then becoming "inactive", but in a sweet way by apologizing if you were somehow mistaken. Are you afraid to actively drive a lynch and are you afraid of pissing him off? Because it seems that you are.
You call DLE town, but you ignore answering his questions which he asked to generate discussion. Again, not doing anything of note or merit. You're hiding behind being aggressive when you're sitting on your ass.
You entertain Kings_ weird tangent, then call him out for it being a bit arbitrary. When you just, on the same page, asked me to share arbitrary thoughts to help the town. Do you just want my thoughts? Or, again, are you trying just to pretend to do something by critiquing someone else who is a bit off base? And then call him out for it?
You've made what? Seven posts in this thread already? And your game is already a jumbled enigma that makes no sense? Calling for "activity" and content when supplying none in return. Asking for me to give reads on little feelings, then criticizing King for doing what you asked? Appearing to look busy and contribute to discussion when you've only weighed in on the posts that happened when you were away by saying in a round about way that you just agree with Jalmont and Blazeade? And ignoring actual game questions from DLE who you say is a town read, but dont say why he is town.
You've went on the offensive to avoid the defensive, but you've broken each conviction you've supposedly trying to uphold.
Defend yourself and your opinions. Stop hiding behind empty content. And do what you've asked of other people. To this point you haven't, and you're by far the biggest scum read for these reasons in what little you've done.
/vote jumpluff