My answer to this is Yes and No. While I do agree that the poll may have been corrupted by people "accidentally" selecting more than what was required, I also think that doing a re-poll would probably encounter the same problem this poll had. Standard poll are usually plagued by "drive-by" voting from "invisible" voters. Most of those voters probably don't even read the poll question let alone the OP. Doing a re-poll may prove to be a waste of time in the end.GT, if people are successfully voting for more than 2 names surely this poll is fecked and needs repolling?
are we doing a re poll with the top 2-3?My answer to this is Yes and No. While I do agree that the poll may have been corrupted by people "accidentally" selecting more than what was required, I also think that doing a re-poll would probably encounter the same problem this poll had. Standard poll are usually plagued by "drive-by" voting from "invisible" voters. Most of those voters probably don't even read the poll question let alone the OP. Doing a re-poll may prove to be a waste of time in the end.
Doh. :-( People are silly. Its a shame we haven't got the polling software to restrict the amount of multiple choice votes people place.My answer to this is Yes and No. While I do agree that the poll may have been corrupted by people "accidentally" selecting more than what was required, I also think that doing a re-poll would probably encounter the same problem this poll had. Standard poll are usually plagued by "drive-by" voting from "invisible" voters. Most of those voters probably don't even read the poll question let alone the OP. Doing a re-poll may prove to be a waste of time in the end.
It does make a difference if people are voting more than the prescribed amount of names.Well, why not allow people to vote for whatever number of names they want? It doesn't make a difference if you think about it. Why not let the people express exactly their preference?
Well since it's too late to do anything about it, I guess it's allow now =/. It's a shame that the people who actually followed the rules got "shafted" in their rights.Well, why not allow people to vote for whatever number of names they want? It doesn't make a difference if you think about it. Why not let the people express exactly their preference?
If you're referring to doing a another poll with the top 2-4 popular for a final showdown, then yes.are we doing a re poll with the top 2-3?
When I said they won't be any re-poll, I meant no re-polling from scratch/the beginning.GT's already said there won't be a repoll.
Yes I do believe that was the original motivation behind the name...I vote Timburn, for a single (and very funny) reason:
I can go "TIIIIIIMBUUUUUUURRRRRRN!!!!!!" when I finish off a foe.