Sorry, but your first piece of logic is awful. Everyone must have different reasons as to why someone is lynched? So if I said here "by the way guys I'm mafia. My role is w, my partners are x and y and this is confirmed because z inspected me last night -- he was just shy about revealing it!" you wouldn't want people to lynch me because I just claimed mafia, you want to analyze posts and make sure everyone has good, unique reasons as to why? This is Day 1, there will be overlap in the votes, deal with it.If Celever built a case / had a reason to lynch DLL that was different from the one stated by B_T, then there would be no problem. I wasn't suggesting that he bandwagon, I was saying that he should have established a case different from B_T. He also wasn't condemned for explaining things, he was rebuked for explaining things and basically reiterating things already expressed by B_T's post. I'm attacking him so he doesn't take pressure votes and turn them into "serious" lynches for no reason, something you clearly missed.
"The last person I played mafia with who was this intentionally antagonistic and abrasive was Metal Sonic, and you know what? He was mafia. My conclusion? While not exactly a defensive post, it certainly was a scummy one." -- This is using a meta case but applying it universally, when a meta case is only useful on a person by person basis. It is the definition of if a is b and b's are c's then all a's must be c's. That's not scum hunting logic, that's bad logic.
You're comparing two different situations.Sorry, but your first piece of logic is awful. Everyone must have different reasons as to why someone is lynched? So if I said here "by the way guys I'm mafia. My role is w, my partners are x and y and this is confirmed because z inspected me last night -- he was just shy about revealing it!" you wouldn't want people to lynch me because I just claimed mafia, you want to analyze posts and make sure everyone has good, unique reasons as to why? This is Day 1, there will be overlap in the votes, deal with it.
Something you have said multiple times now is "take pressure votes and turn them into "serious" lynches for no reason". Um... so you're still dead set on me not having explained my reasoning? Or is this that B_T didn't explain his? I don't know, any way that I look at that statement it doesn't make sense to me by looking back and seeing clear and obvious facts, so please explain to me what you mean by this..?
That second paragraph is interesting. You see, I did exactly the same thing with the infamous "defensive" post. With Obbmud and myself being comparable for not understanding RVS and then getting under fire and all that in two separate games? Why do you feel the need to point such a thing out now, with Walrein, rather than earlier with me? To me, this shows that you are being defensive in an offensive way. You're being defensive and trying to deter suspicion away from you by pushing it on someone else. First it was with me, and it still is, and now you're beginning to move on to Walrein. While I admit that this is a large part of mafia (I've been putting suspicion on you for a while now, but the only suspicion coming my way since I've started targeting you was from yourself lol) so you could say that this is "bad logic" it is also good logic in the way that you are acting defensively and abrasively all the while trying to give off an aggressive facade, presumably to look like LightWolf, who we consider village because of this. All of your posts are chock full of scum tells and that is why I really feel like we should lynch you today.
Then please, once again, explain what you mean. Completely off-topic reference would be like someone saying "Ahh the earth is shaking, get under the tables!" on a magnitude 1, and someone saying "Ahh the earth is shaking, get under the tables!" on a magnitude 10. It doesn't matter to what extremes an example is taken, at the core of the statements there was an earthquake and people dove under the tables. At the core of this statement, you don't like the fact that I voted for B_T without different logic. At the core of the statement I had in my previous post, everyone voted for the same person with the same logic. Would you have been mad if they did so? If not, then you have no reason to be mad now.You're comparing two different situations.
No, the fact that you interpreted a pressure vote as a "serious" lynch and tried to explain it as such.
I didn't point yours out because all you did was look back at the same situation you were in that Obbmud is in now and consider him town. Stuff like that get thrown around a lot but are abandoned because they are completely meaningless. If you are saying it's wrong then there is your opinion rather than solidly backing it up. I don't care whether you think of me as town or mafia, I'm focused on hunting scum. The biggest thing that stuck out to you was the way I play, because it's the thing you care the most about. Congratulations on making a big post yet saying absolutely nothing of consequence.
I might as well claim at this point; I'm a Deputy.
Why the heck did I interpret that as a serious lynch? My bad, it's clearly a rand vote.B_T said:My vote wasn't a rand vote,
I claimed that because it's my role lolOh yeah, and I forgot to add how convenient it is that you claimed Deputy - a role which means you have to survive for a while, and also one which means you can't do anything right now.
"Are you just going to sit here and watch them kill each other?" Trillian demanded, outraged.Dear Felony, you are a Deputy. You want to become a cop, but you’re still in training right now. However, if a Watcher, Tracker, Cop, FBI Agent, or Talent Scout dies, you will assume their role and gain their night action. You win if the town eliminates all anti-town factions and players.
Day 2, Vote Count 1Dear Blue_Tornado, you are a Town Cop. At night, you may choose to perform an investigation on a player. You will be told whether they are Town or Not Town. You win when the town eliminates all anti-town factions and players.
Why do you think that there is definitely a BG itg? This is RNG mafia, we might not even have an BG! >_>We know that the mafia are not targeting Memoric or Cancerous, because they would have either killed them or a bodyguard would have died. This tells me that the mafia members decided to kill him based off of who he suspected, or they had a grudge against him, and decided to randomly kill him. I'll research the former.