metal claw is a shit, counter or bust (and hyper beam or bust)Can confirm, Ursaring is bae. Be careful around water-heavy gyms if base move is Metal Claw, though.
fat pink blob, fat pink blob, fat pink blobOverall, gen2 doesn't give much relevant mon. That bear is frail despite strong, like Gengar. Even the local pseudo legendary is easily less relevant thanks to Fighting buffs and simply existence of little Vapie....
Defending is now impossible with low CP threshold, unless it's named Chansey. Training gyms though, a lot of new options such as Umbreon and Lanturn due to their great survivability.
I almost forgot that. Well, for attacking rival gyms, that fat pink blob can still be doable with things around it CP, thankfully. I got Vapies to clean them up while waiting for Fighters. But it nearly broke the gym until the quick move reversion.fat pink blob, fat pink blob, fat pink blob
this fatboi redefined gym meta, forcing me to use machamp/ursaring in almost every lineup. Also the things like steelix, forretress, umbreon defend quite nicely despite low-ish cp caps
but yeah you're mostly right, gen 2 has introduced more memes than actual mons
That will depend on the metagame as not everywhere is hell like SF (I saw few posts about it and holy sweet Arceus....) Solely basing it on CP is not right either as while they can do their weight, they still have flaws. Godzilla is wrecked by Fightings that had dealt with Blissey and also by Vaporeon who can deal a lot of things as generalist.Defender viability lists should just be sorted by CP, let's be real here. No matter how good a defender truly is, it won't matter in the long run when it gets shaved by the Top 7. We all understand Blissey's dominance in both offense and defense but that doesn't change the fact that the best defender won't matter when you can slot a shit Dragonite on top.
I'm not talking about SF. The endgame realistically consists of the top 7, slowly getting shaved off until we get to the 10 Tyranitar gyms. I hold gyms here with a 2700 Golem and 2500 Exeggutor sitting in them for months, but it doesn't change the fact that those get removed by your own team and then the ball gets rolling.That will depend on the metagame as not everywhere is hell like SF (I saw few posts about it and holy sweet Arceus....) Solely basing it on CP is not right either as while they can do their weight, they still have flaws. Godzilla is wrecked by Fightings that had dealt with Blissey and also by Vaporeon who can deal a lot of things as generalist.
Here, few gyms got stagnant (mostly thanks to these demonwalls, while others are mostly outskirt areas), but there are a lot which change hands very regularly, and some that manages to reach 3 or 4-tier gym before broken down.
Heck, Blissey is a huge deterrent for many people to even try attacking it (or training prestige for that matter), even worse than Snorlax in Gen1 era (I at least could take them out with my Vapie division, one for one)
I can't help but agree with Gamepress that Blissey needs its own tier, followed below by Snorlax and maybe dragons and other CP high things. I don't agree much with GP throwing Vapies below them as many people agree Vapies are also actually capable defender with great annoyance; I have maxed several outstanding ones and faced few myself and they're definitely harder than dons and tars (at least dragons are now legit defender with annoyingly powerful DTail, but I laugh at fake-zillas.)
I know you're not talking about it, but you mean it will be the endgame, everywhere to be hellishly similar to SF. That viability would only depend on defending oneself from own teammate (sad, I know indeed), but remember that there are also people who play and would solo a tall gym or playing in groups, so depending on the local metagame activity, even those all-pseudolegend gyms won't stand for long. When I have time, I for one takes those gyms as fun challenges. With the cycle of building-stagnate-destroyed going on (and some places even skipping the stagnate part), I believe other mons are still certainly relevant. Do remember rival teams do exist.I'm not talking about SF. The endgame realistically consists of the top 7, slowly getting shaved off until we get to the 10 Tyranitar gyms. I hold gyms here with a 2700 Golem and 2500 Exeggutor sitting in them for months, but it doesn't change the fact that those get removed by your own team and then the ball gets rolling.
Perhaps it's a cynical view but with shaving being the problem it is (both for sustaining gyms and when it's done to you), I can't see defenders being anything more than CP sorted atm.
I would argue against placing Vaporeon lower than A, although maybe that's because I'm dedicated enough to her as my faved. I'd say at least A-, penalised by her CP that is just lower than Blissey (I even checked every Pokemon's CP and until Alola, her CP is still right below Blissey). It is that those who can sit above Blissey instantly get extra protection.I go as far as saying that the big 7 are the only Pokemon that really matter for defending. Most of the gyms I see are level 10 gyms with many higher CP Pokemon which are victims of shaving. Anything with CP lower than Vaporeon rarely manages to find a spot in these gyms, and even Vaporeon is an uncommon site in these gyms since, whilst common in recently formed gyms, gradually gets pushed aside by shaving. Unfortunately for Vaporeon, Rhydon are very common and many shavers have multiple Pokemon. Often I find many gyms just have Rhydon, Snorlax, Dnite and Ttar since Rhydon seems to be the benchmark for shaving in areas. 3000 CP seems to be the mark to beat so Pokemon like Vaporeon and Blissey can still get in though if high enough (especially Blissey since its strength at least partially discourages shaving).
The gyms I see that don't only have the big 7 usually get taken down quickly aka not surviving in the metagame.
In all honesty, if I were to make a tier list, I would copy GamePress except I would move Lapras down.
Saying that, Blissey is unquestionably the most effective defender due to raw strength. it does sometimes fall to shaving, but it's raw efficiency makes it harder for potential shavers to take down, and it's so good it deserves it's own ranking. S+ rank
Snorlax is the next best defender due to effectiveness, and its CP beats Mr Shaver Rhydon. S rank
Rhydon, Gyarados, Dnite and Ttar are next since they can place above Blissey and are easier to keep in gyms in the shaving metagame. These are the A rank Pokemon. Dragonite stands a bit above these a A+ as it has the combination of having rare strong counters (Lapras is the only strong counter but that's very difficult to get), great moves both quick and charge, and very high CP (only bested by Ttar who has more counters that are easier to get and weaker moves)
Vaporeon is next. He's a good defender and has a CP very close to that of Blissey. But I do find a lot of high level gyms with 3000+ CP Pokemon, and Vaporeon finds it hard to get a place in the shaving metagame since his CP cannot compete with the above Pokemon. Especially when he places lower than Blissey. He is B rank.
As I said before the big 7 is what matters most, so I feel anything else should be no higher than C rank. C rank would compromise of other good defenders who are limited by their CP in the shaving metagame. Either they're CP is
Would rank as:
- Notably lower than Vaporeon's but very effective at defending: Lapras, Steelix, Slowbro and Slowking.
- Close to Vaporeon's CP but said Pokemon is not as a good as defending as Vaporeon but is still otherwise an effective defender. Exeggutor, Espeon, Donphan. You could potentially use them in the shaving metagame, but given how common both Rhydon and Vaporeon are, everyone will have one of those to deposit instead
- Something inbetween these groups: Ampharos and Machamp
C+: Lapras - I rank Lapras here alone because it's very effective at defending, more so than the other C rank Pokemon
C: Steelix, Slowbro, Slowking, Espeon, Donphan, Exeggutor
C-: Ampharos and Machamp. Maybe Heracross too.
I don't really care about anything lower than those. They're either outclassed e.g. Alakazam to Espeon, Golem to Rhydon, Ursaring to Snorlax or have some key flaws which makes them negligible in the metagame e.g. Scizor being beaten too easily by Fire-types. Even the C rank Pokemon could be collectively grouped since it's only the big 7 that shape the defending metagame.
S+: Blissey
S: Snorlax
A+: Dragonite
A: Tyranitar, Rhydon, Gyarados
B: Vaporeon
C+: Lapras
C: Steelix, Slowbro, Slowking, Espeon, Donphan, Exeggutor
C-: Ampharos, Machamp ?Heracross
My main thought process was that only the big 7 was worth of being at least B rank, for the small variation in defence meta as you said. Vaporeon's lower CP I feel was enough to make it lower than the rest of the big 7. The way I saw it, B rank or higher is the standard meta and everything else below is, though not bad, struggles to find use in this metagame dominated when the highest levelled trainers dominate the metagame and shaving and high CP are big components. I agree with you that Vaporeon pulls its weight very well, but I felt that wasn't enough to compensate for its CP in this metagame.I would argue against placing Vaporeon lower than A, although maybe that's because I'm dedicated enough to her as my faved. I'd say at least A-, penalised by her CP that is just lower than Blissey (I even checked every Pokemon's CP and until Alola, her CP is still right below Blissey). It is that those who can sit above Blissey instantly get extra protection.
That said, Vaporeon can sit higher than many Blisseys when leveled high enough, and I manage to enjoy this fact by putting some of them above these walls. And then yes, she can pull her weight very well, with HPump being instantly shot (though somewhat predictable with every 1-bar) and ATail being water equivalent of dreaded BSlam or DClaw spam and massive health to make mild frustration.
Although maybe B rank could work due to way too small variation in defense meta. We can't really skip one rank or have B as lowest rank here, still, and sadly grasses like Venusaur? destroys her easily although ATail spam can still problem them....
At least here, we got dedicated players who takes these high gyms as challenges. I find myself soloing high gyms sometimes. CP creep definitely factors in, but it has to be balanced with actual performance too. How much is that, I'm not sure, as each place has different levels of activity, I suppose.
I should have been more clear - I meant hard counters when talking about Lapras and Dnite. But yeah I agree with you. I'd count Cloyster as a hard counter too, Dewgong too. Clefable/Wigglytuff are counters for non-Steel Wing variants, and Ttar too, but not hard counters.Oh, and dragon doesn't always have to be murdered by Lappies. Cloyster? does arguably better than it since the nerf, people say, and DTail sets (and DBreath from fools like myself once) can now be countered by fairies. Clefable and Wigglytuff? does pretty great against Dragon quick move sets. And Rock weakness can also be exploited by attacking Tyranitar?. A+ is still right for the hard-hitting moves indeed, though.
Oh, and on the C rank, Slowbro should be nearer to Lapras as he's also decent defender while Lapras share same weakness to Blissey and knowledgeable player would have good anti-Blissey on hand. Lapras had the luxury of rare counters because of Fighting moves being total scrap, but now no longer. Slowbro is... well, annoyingly tough.
I meant both her and Blissey is weak to Fighting, but then it's almost irrelevant by now, I suppose.I should have been more clear - I meant hard counters when talking about Lapras and Dnite. But yeah I agree with you. I'd count Cloyster as a hard counter too, Dewgong too. Clefable/Wigglytuff are counters for non-Steel Wing variants, and Ttar too, but not hard counters.
Not sure what you mean by Lapras sharing same weakness to Blissey - every defender is weak to Blissey.
My main reason for ranking Lapras higher than Slowbro/Slowking was that it takes longer to take down due to Lapras' Stamina. This would make Lapras fair better than Slowbro against, say Jolteon, who typing-wise has the same advantage against both Lapras and Slowbro. Counters wise I think you over-exaggerate Slowbro's lack of counters. Lapras does have Machamp and Ttar, but Slowbro has Exeggutor and Ttar (despite Water-type attacks for both, Slowbro suffers against Bite/Crunch Ttar and Lapras against Stone Edge variants). Exeggutor is the important Pokemon here. A good Exeggutor is more common than a good Machamp since only the new moveset Machamps are good whilst Exeggutors both old and new movesets are good. Plus Exeggutor needs less candy to evolve than Machamp and has a 2/3 chance of a Grass-type special move, whilst Machamp only has 50% to get Counter. In fact I expect practically every high-levelled player to have a good Exeggutor, but not a good Machamp. For comparison, I have many high IVed Exeggutor with Grass-type special attacks, but zero Counter Machamp - (the only 3 Machops I evolved straight to Machamp, since the new movesets came out, all got Bullet Punch). The only other good Fighting-type is Heracross, who is region-limited. Poliwrath works too but needs both Rock Smash and Dynamic Punch (1/6 chance + 125 candy). Other fighting-types are too weak for the job. I still think getting a good Exeggutor is better than a good Fighting-type.
Slowbro/Slowking are probably the next best defenders after Lapras though.